FDA/CDC

FDA Issues Complete Response Letter for Myeloma Drug


 

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has declined to approve linvoseltamab (Regeneron), a bispecific antibody being evaluated to treat relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after progression on at least three previous therapies.

On August 20, Regeneron announced that it had received a complete response letter from the FDA regarding its Biologics License Application for linvoseltamab, citing issues at a third-party manufacturer.

More specifically, Regeneron said in a company press release that the FDA issued the complete response letter based on findings from “a preapproval inspection at a third-party fill/finish manufacturer for another company’s product candidate.”

The third-party manufacturer told Regeneron it believes that the issues have been resolved, Regeneron said, and that facility is now awaiting a follow-up FDA inspection in the “coming months.”

Regeneron noted that this “anticipated outcome” from the FDA preapproval inspection had been disclosed previously during a company earnings call on August 1.

On that call, Regeneron had discussed the FDA’s concerns about the third-party manufacturer and anticipated that “any potential FDA approval for linvoseltamab is likely to be delayed beyond the August 22 PDUFA date.”

Regeneron had initially filed a Biologics License Application for its bispecific antibody in 2023, based on findings from the phase 1/2 single arm LINKER-MM1 trial.

In the latest published trial findings, investigators reported that, at a median follow-up of about 14 months, 71% of the 117 patients receiving 200 mg of linvoseltamab achieved an overall response, with 50% achieving a complete response. The probability of survival at 12 months was 75.3%.

This would have been the first approval for linvoseltamab, which would have joined two agents already on the US market for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: teclistamab (Tecvayli, Janssen) and elranatamab (Elrexfio, Pfizer).

Pricing information for linvoseltamab is not yet available, but its competitors teclistamab and elranatamab are reported to cost around $40,000 per month.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Time Warp: Fax Machines Still Common in Oncology Practice. Why?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Urticaria Linked to Higher Cancer Risk, Study Finds
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Weight Loss Drugs Cut Cancer Risk in Diabetes Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Should Cancer Trial Eligibility Become More Inclusive?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Greater Transparency of Oncologists’ Pharma Relationships Needed
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Expands Darzalex Faspro Indication in Myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Ancient Viruses in Our DNA Hold Clues to Cancer Treatment
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Expands Darzalex Faspro Indication in Myeloma
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Immunotherapy May Be Overused in Dying Patients With Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Approves Axatilimab for Chronic GVHD
MDedge Hematology and Oncology