From the Journals

High Breast Cancer Risk With Menopausal Hormone Therapy & Strong Family History


 

TOPLINE:

The use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) increases breast cancer risk in women with a strong family history of breast cancer. These women have a striking cumulative risk of developing breast cancer (age, 50-80 years) of 22.4%, according to a new modelling study of UK women.

METHODOLOGY:

This was a modeling study integrating two data-sets of UK women: the BOADICEA dataset of age-specific breast cancer risk with family history and the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, which covers relative risk for breast cancer with different types and durations of MHT.

Four different breast cancer family history profiles were:

  • “Average” family history of breast cancer has unknown affected family members;
  • “Modest” family history comprises a single first-degree relative with breast cancer at the age of 60 years.
  • “Intermediate” family history comprises a single first-degree relative who developed breast cancer at the age of 40 years.
  • “Strong” family history comprises two first-degree relatives who developed breast cancer at the age of 50 years.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The lowest risk category: “Average” family history with no MHT use has a cumulative breast cancer risk (age, 50-80 years) of 9.8% and a risk of dying from breast cancer of 1.7%. These risks rise with 5 years’ exposure to MHT (age, 50-55 years) to 11.0% and 1.8%, respectively.
  • The highest risk category: “Strong” family history with no MHT use has a cumulative breast cancer risk (age, 50-80 years) of 19.6% and a risk of dying from breast cancer of 3.2%. These risks rise with 5 years’ exposure to MHT (age, 50-55 years) to 22.4% and 3.5%, respectively.

IN PRACTICE:

The authors concluded that, “These integrated data will enable more accurate estimates of absolute and attributable risk associated with MHT exposure for women with a family history of breast cancer, informing shared decision-making.”

SOURCE:

The lead author is Catherine Huntley of the Institute of Cancer Research, London, England. The study appeared in the British Journal of General Practice.

LIMITATIONS:

Limitations included modeling study that did not directly measure individuals with combined risks.

DISCLOSURES:

The study was funded by several sources including Cancer Research UK. The authors reported no conflicts of interest.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

BRCA Mutations in Men: Important but Often Overlooked
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Radiation Therapy Underused After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Breast Cancer Index Predicts Benefit of Ovarian Function Suppression in Premenopausal Women
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Few Severe Toxicities After SBRT in Oligometastatic Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Should All Patients With Early BC Receive Adjuvant Radiotherapy?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer Treatment 101: A Primer for Non-Oncologists
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer Cases, Deaths in Men Predicted to Surge by 2050
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Do Clonal Hematopoiesis and Mosaic Chromosomal Alterations Increase Solid Tumor Risk?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
False-Positive Mammography Results Linked to Reduced Rates of Future Screenings
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Breast Cancer Hormone Therapy May Protect Against Dementia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology