Article

Everolimus overcomes hormonal resistance in ER-positive breast cancer

The addition of everolimus to exemestane more than doubled progression-free survival in women with advanced breast cancer who became resistant to hormonal therapy.


 

A preplanned interim analysis of the phase III BOLERO- 2 trial in women with advanced hormone-resistant, estrogen receptor– positive (ER+) breast cancer showed that everolimus (Afinitor) combined with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane increased progression-free survival (PFS), by local assessment, from a median of 2.8 months with exemestane alone to 6.9 months—a 57% risk reduction (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P = 1.4 × 10–15). The results were presented at the recent 2011 European Multidisciplinary Cancer Congress in Stockholm, Sweden.1

Based on central assessment, the everolimus-exemestane combination produced a 64% reduction in the risk of progression or death (10.6 months vs 4.1 months; HR = 0.36; P = 3.3 × 10–15), according to lead investigator José Baselga, MD, PhD, of the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center in Boston.

The researchers evaluated everolimus because the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is activated in hormone therapy–resistant advanced breast cancer. Phase II everolimus trials have suggested that the mTORC1 inhibitor could reverse resistance to endocrine therapy.2

The group enrolled 724 postmenopausal women (median age, 62 years) with advanced ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) breast cancer who were refractory to letrozole or anastrozole. Previous treatment also included chemotherapy for metastatic disease in roughly 68% of the patients, tamoxifen in 48%, and fulvestrant (Faslodex) in about 16%. The patients were randomized to treatment with everolimus 10 mg/d or placebo, with both arms receiving exemestane 25 mg/d. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was PFS, as assessed by the investigators; secondary endpoints included survival, response rate, and safety. The preplanned interim analysis was performed and reviewed by an independent data monitoring committee after observing 359 PFS events.

* For a PDF of the full article, click in the link to the left of this introduction.

Recommended Reading

Chemo Timing Does Not Affect Breast Cancer Recurrence
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Trastuzumab-Based T-DM1 Delays Breast Cancer Progression
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Everolimus Posts Big Win in ER-Positive Breast Cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Prone Position During Breast Irradiation Lessens Lung Cancer Risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
California Insurer Drops Bevacizumab Breast Cancer Coverage
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Multimodal DCIS Therapy, Tamoxifen Cuts Breast Cancer Deaths
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Mammography's Role in Saving Lives Deemed Exaggerated
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
The Antiangiogenic Quagmire
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Noncarriers in BRCA Families Dodge Breast Cancer Risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Meeting Highlights From the 2011 Breast Cancer Symposium
MDedge Hematology and Oncology