News

Skin Cancer Tops Malpractice Claims in Florida


 

FROM THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE FLORIDA SOCIETY OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGEONS

This and 19 other non-melanoma skin cancer malpractice claims were settled in favor of the plaintiff; 3 resulted in summary judgments for the defendant; 8 were settled out of court; and 15 suits were dropped by the plaintiff in favor of the physician defendant.

Melanoma diagnosis and/or treatment were cited in 17 malpractice cases. The second largest settlement to a plaintiff (out of the 180 cases reported) was $900,000 to a patient with malignant melanoma who had a biopsy but no pathology results or other follow-up. This and six other melanoma cases were settled in favor of the plaintiff. One case went to court and the plaintiff received $679,000 for severe scarring of his/her back related to malignant melanoma.

Another four melanoma cases were settled for an unknown amount and five claims were dropped by the plaintiff in favor of the defendant.

Mohs Surgery Claims

Mohs surgery comprised another major category with 29 malpractice claims. The largest settlement for a plaintiff was $875,000, stemming from Mohs surgery to remove a tumor from the arm. The patient lost the arm and claimed the dermatologic surgeon failed to diagnose malignant fibrous histiocytoma.

Two Mohs surgery claims were adjudicated as summary judgments for the defendant. Another ten cases were suits dropped by the plaintiff in favor of the defendant physician.

"This is the opposite of what I expected. I thought there would be more cases in the cosmetic derm area and less in derm surgery," Dr. Terry Cronin Jr., a private practice dermatologist in Melbourne, Fla., said during a Q and A session.

"I was surprised about this, too," Dr. Becker replied.

Overall, only 11 of the 180 closed claims actually went to court. Dr. Becker said, "The large majority [eight of these] were settled by the court with a summary judgment. This is the best news."

A meeting attendee asked if it is better to be direct with the patient or to call a lawyer if something does not go well. Dr. Becker replied: "Talking to your patient directly is a good idea and talking to your lawyer is also a good idea."

Dr. Becker said he had no relevant financial disclosures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

At-Home Care Put to the Test Under ACA
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
e-Prescribing Survey Pinpoints Connectivity, Processing Issues
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Cancer Death Rates Continue to Drop
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Federal Rules Aim to Standardize Electronic Payments
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Health Spending Continues Historic Decline in 2010
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survey: U.S., Older Docs More Skeptical of Health IT
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Vermont Named America's Healthiest State
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Inpatient Costs Rise Slower for Elderly Patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MedPAC to Congress: Replace SGR Now
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Sends User Fee Recommendations to Congress
MDedge Hematology and Oncology