Original Report

Randomized trial of vitamin B6 for preventing hand-foot syndrome from capecitabine chemotherapy


 

Background Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is used to treat various malignancies. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting toxicity of capecitabine that can limit the use of this agent in some patients. Some investigators have observed that pyridoxine (vitamin B6) can ameliorate HFS that is caused by capecitabine. We designed a prospective trial to determine if pyridoxine can prevent HFS in patients who receive capecitabine.

Methods In our double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned eligible patients who were treated with capecitabine to receive either daily pyridoxine 100 mg or placebo along with their capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimen. Patients were observed during the first 4 cycles of capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint was the incidence and grade of HFS that occurred in both study arms.

Results Between 2008 and 2011, 77 patients were randomly assigned to receive either pyridoxine (n = 38) or placebo (n = 39). Dosages of capecitabine were equally matched between both arms of the study. HFS occurred after a median of 2 chemotherapy cycles in both groups. HFS developed in 10 of 38 (26%) patients in the pyridoxine group and in 8 of 39 (21%) patients in the placebo group (P = .547). Therefore, the risk of HFS was 5 percentage points higher in pyridoxine group (95% confdence interval [CI] for difference, –13 percentage points to +25 percentage points). Given our study results, a true beneft from pyridoxine can be excluded. No difference in HFS grades was observed.

Limitations Single-institution study.

Conclusion Prophylactic pyridoxine (vitamin B6), given concomitantly with capecitabine-containing chemotherapy, was not effective for the prevention of HFS.

*To read the full article, click on the PDF icon at the top of this introduction.

Recommended Reading

No overall benefit seen with bisphosphonate treatment in chemoresistant breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Survival no better after primary tumor removal in metastatic breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy promising for lymphedema
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Will 100% coverage spur more use of breast cancer chemopreventives?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
No benefit seen for investigational antiangiogenic agent in metastatic breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
New insights into aromatase inhibitor therapy nonpersistence
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Biennial mammography keeps women safe and saves billions of dollars
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Synthetic lethality: beating cancer at its own game
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Removing opposite breast cuts 20-year mortality 48% in BRCA mutation carriers
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Guidelines: No ink on tumor is adequate surgical margin for early-stage breast cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology

Related Articles

  • From the Editor

    Your voice on our pages

    As practicing oncologists, we know the importance of having a professional support system in place, platforms that allow us to dissect and discuss...