News

Bevacizumab-enhanced chemo ‘new standard’ in metastatic cervical cancer


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM ICACT 2015

References

PARIS – Although survival remains relatively poor, the options for the management of metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer have increased in recent years, with bevacizumab-enhanced, platinum-based, combination chemotherapy becoming the “new standard” for many women according to medical oncologist Isabelle Ray-Coquard.

Speaking at a recent international conference on anticancer treatment, Dr. Ray-Coquard of Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon, France, noted that there are several questions that the medical oncologists must address before prescribing treatment. These are: Would the patient benefit from chemotherapy and if so, should a single-agent or a combination be used? Is the patient a candidate for a new or novel agent? Or would palliative care be the best option? How can patients best be selected for treatment?

Dr. Isabelle Ray-Coquard

Dr. Isabelle Ray-Coquard

“We have some strong data to support the use of cisplatin first line,” she observed. “Cisplatin is probably the first actor in the management of cervix cancer.” Response rates using single-agent cisplatin have ranged from 18% to 25% in women with recurrent and advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

“The question is what is the best partner for cisplatin?” Dr. Ray-Coquard asked. She highlighted several studies showing the activity of other cytotoxic chemotherapies as single agents, with the highest responses seen with paclitaxel (Taxol, at 19% of patients), followed by vinorelbine (Navelbine, 18%), irinotecan (Campto, 17%), topotecan (Hycamtin, 16%), docetaxel (Taxotere, 13%), and the lowest with gemcitabine (Gemzar, 8%).

Both paclitaxel and topotecan have been studied in combination with cisplatin vs. cisplatin alone and been shown to confer survival benefits. In the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 169 study (J. Clin. Oncol. 2004;22:3113-9), for example, paclitaxel plus cisplatin was associated with a significant (P < .001) increase in progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.8 vs. 2.8 months, although overall survival (OS) was not statistically different (9.7 vs. 8.8 months). Dr. Ray-Coquard noted, however, that paclitaxel had been given to women randomized to cisplatin at relapse, which might have clouded the OS benefit.

Similar benefits were seen when topotecan and cisplatin were combined and compared against single agent cisplatin in the GOG 179 study (J. Clin. Oncol. 2005;23:4626-33), with median PFS of 4.6 vs 2.9 months (P = .014) and median OS of 9.4 and 6.5 months (P = .017).

Pages

Recommended Reading

Bisphosphonates may protect against endometrial cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA approves PARP-inhibitor for ovarian cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Patients cured of gestational trophoblastic tumors rarely develop subsequent malignancy
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Panel: HPV test can be primary screen for cervical cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Metabolic syndrome linked to increased risk for most endometrial cancer subtypes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
A generalist approach to fertility preservation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Everolimus/letrozole combo provides clinical benefit in recurrent endometrial cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Treating VTE in patients with gynecologic malignancies
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Short-term hormone replacement therapy upped ovarian cancer risk
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Aggressive surgery doesn’t necessarily improve survival from advanced ovarian cancer
MDedge Hematology and Oncology