User login
Bringing you the latest news, research and reviews, exclusive interviews, podcasts, quizzes, and more.
England green-lights coverage of one CAR T-cell therapy
The National Health Service (NHS) of England has announced that tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, will soon be available for certain leukemia patients.
, and patients could potentially begin receiving the treatment within weeks.
NHS England struck a deal with Novartis to lower the price of tisagenlecleucel, which costs around £282,000 per patient at its full list price. The discount offered to the NHS is confidential.
Tisagenlecleucel was recently approved by the European Commission (EC) to treat patients up to 25 years of age who have B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
The EC also approved tisagenlecleucel to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
However, tisagenlecleucel will be available only for ALL patients in England, at least initially. A decision has not been made regarding funding for tisagenlecleucel in DLBCL, and Novartis previously decided to launch tisagenlecleucel in ALL first.
“It’s fantastic news for children and young people with this form of leukemia that CAR T-cell therapy will be made available on the NHS, making them the first in Europe to have routine access to this exciting new type of immunotherapy,” said Charles Swanton, Cancer Research UK’s chief clinician.
The first three NHS hospitals to go through the international accreditation process for the provision of tisagenlecleucel are in London, Manchester, and Newcastle. Subject to passing accreditation requirements, the first treatments could begin in a matter of weeks.
Another CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), has not fared as well as in England. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recently issued draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel in England.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel was approved by the EC to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy. However, NICE said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy. NICE also said the price of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources, and the therapy does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund.
The National Health Service (NHS) of England has announced that tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, will soon be available for certain leukemia patients.
, and patients could potentially begin receiving the treatment within weeks.
NHS England struck a deal with Novartis to lower the price of tisagenlecleucel, which costs around £282,000 per patient at its full list price. The discount offered to the NHS is confidential.
Tisagenlecleucel was recently approved by the European Commission (EC) to treat patients up to 25 years of age who have B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
The EC also approved tisagenlecleucel to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
However, tisagenlecleucel will be available only for ALL patients in England, at least initially. A decision has not been made regarding funding for tisagenlecleucel in DLBCL, and Novartis previously decided to launch tisagenlecleucel in ALL first.
“It’s fantastic news for children and young people with this form of leukemia that CAR T-cell therapy will be made available on the NHS, making them the first in Europe to have routine access to this exciting new type of immunotherapy,” said Charles Swanton, Cancer Research UK’s chief clinician.
The first three NHS hospitals to go through the international accreditation process for the provision of tisagenlecleucel are in London, Manchester, and Newcastle. Subject to passing accreditation requirements, the first treatments could begin in a matter of weeks.
Another CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), has not fared as well as in England. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recently issued draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel in England.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel was approved by the EC to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy. However, NICE said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy. NICE also said the price of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources, and the therapy does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund.
The National Health Service (NHS) of England has announced that tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, will soon be available for certain leukemia patients.
, and patients could potentially begin receiving the treatment within weeks.
NHS England struck a deal with Novartis to lower the price of tisagenlecleucel, which costs around £282,000 per patient at its full list price. The discount offered to the NHS is confidential.
Tisagenlecleucel was recently approved by the European Commission (EC) to treat patients up to 25 years of age who have B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
The EC also approved tisagenlecleucel to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
However, tisagenlecleucel will be available only for ALL patients in England, at least initially. A decision has not been made regarding funding for tisagenlecleucel in DLBCL, and Novartis previously decided to launch tisagenlecleucel in ALL first.
“It’s fantastic news for children and young people with this form of leukemia that CAR T-cell therapy will be made available on the NHS, making them the first in Europe to have routine access to this exciting new type of immunotherapy,” said Charles Swanton, Cancer Research UK’s chief clinician.
The first three NHS hospitals to go through the international accreditation process for the provision of tisagenlecleucel are in London, Manchester, and Newcastle. Subject to passing accreditation requirements, the first treatments could begin in a matter of weeks.
Another CAR T-cell therapy, axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), has not fared as well as in England. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recently issued draft guidance recommending against the use of axicabtagene ciloleucel in England.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel was approved by the EC to treat patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL or primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy. However, NICE said it isn’t clear how much of a benefit axicabtagene ciloleucel may provide over salvage chemotherapy. NICE also said the price of axicabtagene ciloleucel is too high for the therapy to be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources, and the therapy does not meet the criteria for inclusion in the Cancer Drugs Fund.
Researchers find drug target in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma
Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).
Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”
The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in human ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset, and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.
Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.
The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.
“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said in a statement.
He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2 – either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors – induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.
In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P less than .0001).
Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.
They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”
Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.
“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available,” said study coauthor Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna. “[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”
The researchers received grant funding from various organizations but reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Prutsch N et al. Leukemia. 2018 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0239-1.
Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).
Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”
The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in human ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset, and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.
Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.
The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.
“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said in a statement.
He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2 – either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors – induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.
In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P less than .0001).
Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.
They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”
Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.
“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available,” said study coauthor Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna. “[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”
The researchers received grant funding from various organizations but reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Prutsch N et al. Leukemia. 2018 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0239-1.
Preclinical research indicates that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective in treating anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL).
Researchers found evidence to suggest that TYK2 “is highly expressed in all cases of human ALCL.”
The team also discovered that TYK2 inhibition induces apoptosis in human ALCL cells, and it delays tumor onset, and prolongs survival in a mouse model of ALCL.
Olaf Merkel, PhD, of the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, and his colleagues detailed these findings in Leukemia.
The researchers said their analyses suggest TYK2 is expressed in all types of ALCL, regardless of ALK status, and TYK2 mediates the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.
“Therefore, we could consider TYK2 signaling as the Achilles’ heel of ALCL, as, in all patients we have analyzed, the tumor cells relied on this activity to support the essential survival signal,” Dr. Merkel said in a statement.
He and his colleagues found that disrupting TYK2 – either via gene knockdown or with small-molecule TYK2 inhibitors – induced apoptosis in human ALCL cells in vitro.
In a mouse model of NPM-ALK-induced lymphoma, Tyk2 deletion slowed the rate of tumor growth and significantly prolonged survival. The median survival was 53.3 weeks in mice with Tyk2 deletion and 16.0 weeks in control mice (P less than .0001).
Additional experiments in human ALCL cell lines showed that “TYK2 is activated by autocrine production of IL-10 and IL-22 and by interaction with specific receptors expressed by the cells,” the researchers said.
They also found that “activated TYK2 leads to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, activated expression of MCL1, and aberrant ALCL cell survival.”
Taking these findings together, the researchers concluded that TYK2 inhibitors could be effective for treating ALCL.
“We are looking forward to TYK2 inhibitors becoming available,” said study coauthor Lukas Kenner, MD, of the Medical University of Vienna. “[I]n the more rare lymphomas, we urgently need better therapies.”
The researchers received grant funding from various organizations but reported having no conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Prutsch N et al. Leukemia. 2018 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0239-1.
FROM LEUKEMIA
Key clinical point:
Major finding: TYK2 was expressed in all types of ALCL studied and mediated the same anti-apoptotic response across ALCLs.
Study details: A preclinical study of mouse and human ALCL cell lines.
Disclosures: The researchers received grant funding from various organizations but reported having no conflicts of interest.
Source: Prutsch N et al. Leukemia. 2018 Aug 21. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0239-1.
Rituximab/lenalidomide similar to rituximab/chemotherapy for follicular lymphoma
Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.
RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.
This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.
After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).
In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.
Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.
“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.
The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.
Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.
RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.
This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.
After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).
In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.
Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.
“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.
The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.
Rituximab plus lenalidomide had efficacy similar to that of rituximab plus chemotherapy in treatment of follicular lymphoma, according to results from a phase 3 trial.
RELEVANCE (NCT01476787) was a multicenter, international, randomized, open-label trial designed to determine the superiority of rituximab/lenalidomide over rituximab/chemotherapy.
This trial randomized 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma to receive either rituximab plus lenalidomide (n = 513) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (n = 517) for 18 cycles; both groups then went on to receive rituximab maintenance therapy for 12 cycles. The total duration of treatment was 120 weeks. The median age of the combined groups was 59 years. The study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
One of the coprimary endpoints was complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) by the end of the treatment period; the other was progression-free survival, which was planned to be assessed through three analyses, including two interim analyses, the first of which was reported in this study.
After a median follow-up of 37.9 months, the rates of coprimary endpoints were similar between the two groups. Complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) was seen in 48% of the rituximab/lenalidomide group (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-53) and in 53% of the rituximab/chemotherapy group (95% CI, 49-57; P = .13). The hazard ratio for progression or death from any cause was 1.10 (95% CI, 0.85-1.43; P = .48).
In the subgroup analyses, the efficacy of rituximab plus chemotherapy was greater in low-risk patients (based on Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores) and in patients whose follicular lymphoma was Ann Arbor stage I or II, whereas efficacy of rituximab/lenalidomide was independent of prognostic factors.
Safety was the biggest area of difference, with some events being more common in one group than in the other. For example, cutaneous reactions, diarrhea, rash, and myalgia were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide treatment, whereas anemia, fatigue, nausea, and febrile neutropenia were more common with rituximab/chemotherapy treatment. Among grade 3 or 4 events, cutaneous reactions were more common with rituximab/lenalidomide, and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with rituximab/chemotherapy.
“Overall, both treatment groups showed good outcomes, and a median has not yet been reached for either progression-free survival or overall survival,” the study authors wrote.
The RELEVANCE trial was sponsored by Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organisation. The study authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.
SOURCE: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.
FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Complete responses were seen in 48% of rituximab/lenalidomide patients versus 53% in the rituximab/chemotherapy patients (P = .13).
Study details: A phase 3 superiority trial of 1,030 patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma.
Disclosures: Celgene and the Lymphoma Academic Research Organization funded the study. The authors reported various disclosures, including financial ties to Celgene.
Source: Morschhauser F et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934-47.
Adverse events outweigh promise of SGN-CD70A against NHL
An investigational antibody-drug conjugate labeled SGN-CD70A showed signs of efficacy against relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas in a phase 1 trial, but its future is clouded by a high incidence of treatment-associated thrombocytopenia, investigators reported.
Among 20 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, and other histologies, SGN-CD70A was associated with one complete remission (CR) and three partial remissions (PR), two of which were ongoing at nearly 43 weeks of follow-up.
However, 15 of the 20 patients (75%) had treatment-related thrombocytopenias, and 13 of these adverse events (AEs) were grade 3 or greater in severity, reported Tycel Phillips, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and his colleagues.
Notwithstanding the antibody-drug conjugate’s apparent efficacy in this early trial, “the applicability of SGN-CD70A is limited by the frequency and severity of thrombocytopenia, despite the long-term of response with limited drug exposure. Given that we are currently unable to mitigate this AE, the rationale for further investigation of SGN-CD70A remains limited and is, therefore, not planned,” they wrote in the journal Investigational New Drugs.
SGN-CD70A consists of an antibody directed against the plasma membrane protein CD70, a protease-cleavable linker, and a DNA-crosslinking pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer drug. Its mechanism of action is via double-strand DNA breaks in CD70-positive cells that eventually cause programmed cell death.
Dr. Phillips and his colleagues reported on the high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort in the phase 1 trial. The cohort included nine patients with DLBCL, five with mantle cell lymphoma, two with transformed DLBCL, one with T- cell/histocyte–rich large B cell lymphoma, and three with unspecified NHL histologies.
The patients had undergone a median of 3.5 prior lines of systemic therapy, and all had relatively good performance status, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0 or 1.
Patients were started on intravenous SGN-CD70A at a dose of 8 mcg/kg on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, with a planned dose escalation to 200 mcg/kg, The protocol was amended to dosing every 6 weeks, however, after the investigators observed prolonged thrombocytopenias in some patients. A total of 12 patients were treated every 3 weeks, and 8 were treated every 6 weeks.
The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenias, which occurred in three-quarters of all patients, and were largely grade 3 or greater in severity. Other treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or greater occurring in more than one patient include neutropenia in six patients; anemia in five patients; and congestive heart failure, Clostridium difficile infections, dyspnea, and decreased forced expiratory volume in two patients each.
Other common AEs were nausea and fatigue.
The investigators noted that the cause of the deep and durable thrombocytopenias could not be determined, despite assessment of known biomarkers for this complication.
The duration of the thrombocytopenia and the fact that some of the few responses that did occur were also durable after the end of treatment suggest that the dimer drug, the cytotoxic “payload” of the antibody-drug conjugate, was responsible for the effects they observed, the authors said.
The study was funded by Seattle Genetics. Dr. Phillips reported advisory board membership with the company, and four of the coauthors are employees of the company with equity interests.
SOURCE: Phillips T et al. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0655-0.
An investigational antibody-drug conjugate labeled SGN-CD70A showed signs of efficacy against relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas in a phase 1 trial, but its future is clouded by a high incidence of treatment-associated thrombocytopenia, investigators reported.
Among 20 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, and other histologies, SGN-CD70A was associated with one complete remission (CR) and three partial remissions (PR), two of which were ongoing at nearly 43 weeks of follow-up.
However, 15 of the 20 patients (75%) had treatment-related thrombocytopenias, and 13 of these adverse events (AEs) were grade 3 or greater in severity, reported Tycel Phillips, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and his colleagues.
Notwithstanding the antibody-drug conjugate’s apparent efficacy in this early trial, “the applicability of SGN-CD70A is limited by the frequency and severity of thrombocytopenia, despite the long-term of response with limited drug exposure. Given that we are currently unable to mitigate this AE, the rationale for further investigation of SGN-CD70A remains limited and is, therefore, not planned,” they wrote in the journal Investigational New Drugs.
SGN-CD70A consists of an antibody directed against the plasma membrane protein CD70, a protease-cleavable linker, and a DNA-crosslinking pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer drug. Its mechanism of action is via double-strand DNA breaks in CD70-positive cells that eventually cause programmed cell death.
Dr. Phillips and his colleagues reported on the high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort in the phase 1 trial. The cohort included nine patients with DLBCL, five with mantle cell lymphoma, two with transformed DLBCL, one with T- cell/histocyte–rich large B cell lymphoma, and three with unspecified NHL histologies.
The patients had undergone a median of 3.5 prior lines of systemic therapy, and all had relatively good performance status, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0 or 1.
Patients were started on intravenous SGN-CD70A at a dose of 8 mcg/kg on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, with a planned dose escalation to 200 mcg/kg, The protocol was amended to dosing every 6 weeks, however, after the investigators observed prolonged thrombocytopenias in some patients. A total of 12 patients were treated every 3 weeks, and 8 were treated every 6 weeks.
The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenias, which occurred in three-quarters of all patients, and were largely grade 3 or greater in severity. Other treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or greater occurring in more than one patient include neutropenia in six patients; anemia in five patients; and congestive heart failure, Clostridium difficile infections, dyspnea, and decreased forced expiratory volume in two patients each.
Other common AEs were nausea and fatigue.
The investigators noted that the cause of the deep and durable thrombocytopenias could not be determined, despite assessment of known biomarkers for this complication.
The duration of the thrombocytopenia and the fact that some of the few responses that did occur were also durable after the end of treatment suggest that the dimer drug, the cytotoxic “payload” of the antibody-drug conjugate, was responsible for the effects they observed, the authors said.
The study was funded by Seattle Genetics. Dr. Phillips reported advisory board membership with the company, and four of the coauthors are employees of the company with equity interests.
SOURCE: Phillips T et al. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0655-0.
An investigational antibody-drug conjugate labeled SGN-CD70A showed signs of efficacy against relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas in a phase 1 trial, but its future is clouded by a high incidence of treatment-associated thrombocytopenia, investigators reported.
Among 20 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma, and other histologies, SGN-CD70A was associated with one complete remission (CR) and three partial remissions (PR), two of which were ongoing at nearly 43 weeks of follow-up.
However, 15 of the 20 patients (75%) had treatment-related thrombocytopenias, and 13 of these adverse events (AEs) were grade 3 or greater in severity, reported Tycel Phillips, MD, of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and his colleagues.
Notwithstanding the antibody-drug conjugate’s apparent efficacy in this early trial, “the applicability of SGN-CD70A is limited by the frequency and severity of thrombocytopenia, despite the long-term of response with limited drug exposure. Given that we are currently unable to mitigate this AE, the rationale for further investigation of SGN-CD70A remains limited and is, therefore, not planned,” they wrote in the journal Investigational New Drugs.
SGN-CD70A consists of an antibody directed against the plasma membrane protein CD70, a protease-cleavable linker, and a DNA-crosslinking pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer drug. Its mechanism of action is via double-strand DNA breaks in CD70-positive cells that eventually cause programmed cell death.
Dr. Phillips and his colleagues reported on the high-risk non-Hodgkin lymphoma cohort in the phase 1 trial. The cohort included nine patients with DLBCL, five with mantle cell lymphoma, two with transformed DLBCL, one with T- cell/histocyte–rich large B cell lymphoma, and three with unspecified NHL histologies.
The patients had undergone a median of 3.5 prior lines of systemic therapy, and all had relatively good performance status, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0 or 1.
Patients were started on intravenous SGN-CD70A at a dose of 8 mcg/kg on day 1 of each 3-week cycle, with a planned dose escalation to 200 mcg/kg, The protocol was amended to dosing every 6 weeks, however, after the investigators observed prolonged thrombocytopenias in some patients. A total of 12 patients were treated every 3 weeks, and 8 were treated every 6 weeks.
The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenias, which occurred in three-quarters of all patients, and were largely grade 3 or greater in severity. Other treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or greater occurring in more than one patient include neutropenia in six patients; anemia in five patients; and congestive heart failure, Clostridium difficile infections, dyspnea, and decreased forced expiratory volume in two patients each.
Other common AEs were nausea and fatigue.
The investigators noted that the cause of the deep and durable thrombocytopenias could not be determined, despite assessment of known biomarkers for this complication.
The duration of the thrombocytopenia and the fact that some of the few responses that did occur were also durable after the end of treatment suggest that the dimer drug, the cytotoxic “payload” of the antibody-drug conjugate, was responsible for the effects they observed, the authors said.
The study was funded by Seattle Genetics. Dr. Phillips reported advisory board membership with the company, and four of the coauthors are employees of the company with equity interests.
SOURCE: Phillips T et al. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0655-0.
FROM INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
Key clinical point: A high incidence of unexplained
Major finding: In total, 15 of 20 patients had treatment-related thrombocytopenias; 13 of these adverse events were grade 3 or greater in severity.
Study details: A 20-patient NHL cohort of a phase 1 dose-finding, pharmacologic, safety, and preliminary efficacy trial of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-CD70A.
Disclosures: The study was funded by Seattle Genetics. Dr. Phillips reported advisory board membership with the company, and four of the coauthors are employees of the company with equity interests.
Source: Phillips T et al. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0655-0.
New BTK inhibitor under review in China
for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently granted the drug fast track designation for the treatment of patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The application in China is supported by results from a phase 2, single-arm trial of 86 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who received 160 mg zanubrutinib orally twice daily. The overall response rate was 84%, which included 59% of patients with a complete response. At 8.3 months of follow-up, the median duration of response had not been reached, according to the drug’s sponsor BeiGene.
Zanubrutinib is being studied in several ongoing trials, including for the treatment of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma in combination with obinutuzumab, and comparing it to ibrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently granted the drug fast track designation for the treatment of patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The application in China is supported by results from a phase 2, single-arm trial of 86 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who received 160 mg zanubrutinib orally twice daily. The overall response rate was 84%, which included 59% of patients with a complete response. At 8.3 months of follow-up, the median duration of response had not been reached, according to the drug’s sponsor BeiGene.
Zanubrutinib is being studied in several ongoing trials, including for the treatment of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma in combination with obinutuzumab, and comparing it to ibrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
for the treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently granted the drug fast track designation for the treatment of patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia.
The application in China is supported by results from a phase 2, single-arm trial of 86 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL who received 160 mg zanubrutinib orally twice daily. The overall response rate was 84%, which included 59% of patients with a complete response. At 8.3 months of follow-up, the median duration of response had not been reached, according to the drug’s sponsor BeiGene.
Zanubrutinib is being studied in several ongoing trials, including for the treatment of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma in combination with obinutuzumab, and comparing it to ibrutinib in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia and CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma.
European Commission approves first CAR T-cell therapies
The , two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.
Tisagenlecleucel is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel is approved for adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy. The treatment is marketed by Kite, a Gilead company.
The axicabtagene ciloleucel approval is based on results from the single arm, ZUMA-1 trial. During the study of 101 patients who received a single infusion, 72% responded to therapy and 51% achieved a complete response. At 1 year, median overall survival had not been reached.
Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.
The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.
Updated results from JULIET were presented at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018. The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so because of disease progression or clinical deterioration.
The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.
The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.
Updated results from ELIANA were published in New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:439-48).
The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n = 45) achieving a complete remission (CR) and 21% (n = 16) achieving a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.
The , two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.
Tisagenlecleucel is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel is approved for adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy. The treatment is marketed by Kite, a Gilead company.
The axicabtagene ciloleucel approval is based on results from the single arm, ZUMA-1 trial. During the study of 101 patients who received a single infusion, 72% responded to therapy and 51% achieved a complete response. At 1 year, median overall survival had not been reached.
Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.
The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.
Updated results from JULIET were presented at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018. The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so because of disease progression or clinical deterioration.
The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.
The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.
Updated results from ELIANA were published in New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:439-48).
The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n = 45) achieving a complete remission (CR) and 21% (n = 16) achieving a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.
The , two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.
Tisagenlecleucel is now approved for use in pediatric and young adult patients up to 25 years of age with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory, in relapse post transplant, or in second or later relapse.
Tisagenlecleucel is also approved to treat adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have received two or more lines of systemic therapy.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel is approved for adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) after two or more lines of systemic therapy. The treatment is marketed by Kite, a Gilead company.
The axicabtagene ciloleucel approval is based on results from the single arm, ZUMA-1 trial. During the study of 101 patients who received a single infusion, 72% responded to therapy and 51% achieved a complete response. At 1 year, median overall survival had not been reached.
Novartis expects to launch tisagenlecleucel initially for pediatric ALL. The company said timing for tisagenlecleucel availability in each country will depend on multiple factors, including the onboarding of qualified treatment centers for the appropriate indications, as well as the completion of national reimbursement procedures.
The EC’s approval of tisagenlecleucel is based on results from the phase 2 JULIET and ELIANA trials.
Updated results from JULIET were presented at the annual congress of the European Hematology Association in June 2018. The trial enrolled 165 adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and 111 of them received a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel. Most of the patients who discontinued before dosing did so because of disease progression or clinical deterioration.
The median time from infusion to data cutoff was 13.9 months.
The overall response rate was 52%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 40%. At the time of data cutoff, none of the responders had gone on to receive a stem cell transplant.
Updated results from ELIANA were published in New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:439-48).
The trial included 75 children and young adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. The overall remission rate was 81% (61/75), with 60% of patients (n = 45) achieving a complete remission (CR) and 21% (n = 16) achieving a CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).
All patients whose best response was CR/CRi were negative for minimal residual disease. The median duration of response was not met.
ctDNA predicts early outcomes in DLBCL
Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.
![Micrograph of a 'diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Lymph node FNA specimen. Field stain.(http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons](https://cdn.mdedge.com/files/s3fs-public/Image/June-2017/DLBCL_web.jpg)
Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.
Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.
“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.
In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.
On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).
Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).
In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.
The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.
The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.
Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.
“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.
Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.
Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.
SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.
Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.
Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.
Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.
“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.
In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.
On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).
Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).
In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.
The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.
The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.
Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.
“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.
Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.
Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.
SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.
Measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a new and useful tool for predicting survival outcomes and response to therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), according to authors of a recent prospective study.
Pretreatment ctDNA levels predicted 24-month event-free survival – an important disease milestone in DLBCL – as well as overall survival in the study, which included more than 200 patients at six institutions in North America and Europe.
Changes in ctDNA during treatment were prognostic for outcomes as early as 21 days into therapy, according to corresponding author Ash A. Alizadeh, MD, PhD, of Stanford (Calif.) University and his coinvestigators.
“Our data suggest that both pretreatment and dynamic assessments of ctDNA are feasible and can add to established risk factors,” Dr. Alizadeh and his coauthors reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.
ctDNA was detected in 98% of the 217 patients evaluated, which demonstrated the “potentially universal applicability” of this approach, they wrote in the report.
In an evaluation of pretreatment ctDNA levels, investigators found a 2.5 log haploid genome equivalents per milliliter (hGE/mL) threshold stratified patient outcomes. Event-free survival was significantly inferior at 24 months in patients with ctDNA above that threshold, with hazard ratios of 2.6 (P = .007) for frontline treatment and 2.9 (P = 0.01) for salvage.
On-treatment ctDNA levels were favorably prognostic for outcomes in patients receiving frontline therapy, according to investigators. An early molecular response (EMR), defined as a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one cycle of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no EMR (P = .0015).
Major molecular response (MMR), defined as a 2.5-log drop in ctDNA after two cycles of treatment, was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 82% versus 46% for no MMR in patients on frontline therapy (P less than .001).
In one cohort of patients receiving salvage therapy, EMR also predicted superior 24-month event-free survival, according to investigators.
The EMR measure was also favorably prognostic for overall survival in both the frontline and salvage settings.
The prognostic value of measuring ctDNA was independent of International Prognostic Index (IPI) and interim PET/CT studies, results of multivariable analysis showed.
Patients had “excellent outcomes” if they had both molecular response and favorable interim PET results, and conversely, patients were at “extremely high risk” for treatment failure if they had no molecular response and a positive PET scan.
“The identification of patients at exceptionally high risk (i.e., interim PET/CT positive and not achieving EMR/MMR) could provide an opportunity for early intervention with alternative treatments, including autologous bone marrow transplantation or chimeric antigen receptor T cells,” the researchers wrote.
Patients in the study were all treated with combination immunochemotherapy according to local standards.
Dr. Alizadeh reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, as well as patent filings on ctDNA detection assigned to Stanford University.
SOURCE: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.
FROM THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Early molecular response (a 2-log decrease in ctDNA levels after one treatment cycle) was associated with a 24-month event-free survival of 83% versus 50% for no early molecular response (P = .0015).
Study details: Prospective analysis of pretreatment and dynamic on-treatment ctDNA levels in patients with DLBCL who received standard immunochemotherapy.
Disclosures: Study authors reported disclosures related to CiberMed, Forty Seven, Janssen Oncology, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, and Gilead, among others.
Source: Kurtz DM et al. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246.
FDA approves ibrutinib with rituximab in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia
The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).
Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.
The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.
Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:2399-2410).
The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.20; P less than .0001).
The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.
Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and three in the rituximab arm.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).
Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.
The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.
Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:2399-2410).
The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.20; P less than .0001).
The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.
Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and three in the rituximab arm.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech.
The Food and Drug Administration has approved ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for use in combination with rituximab to treat adults with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM).
Ibrutinib was approved for use as a single agent in adults with WM in January 2015.
The latest approval was supported by the phase 3 iNNOVATE trial, in which researchers compared ibrutinib plus rituximab to rituximab alone in patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory WM.
Results from iNNOVATE were presented at the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine (2018;378:2399-2410).
The 30-month progression-free survival rates were 82% in the ibrutinib arm and 28% in the placebo arm. The median progression-free survival was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 20.3 months in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.20; P less than .0001).
The 30-month overall survival rates were 94% in the ibrutinib arm and 92% in the placebo arm.
Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of patients in the ibrutinib arm and 61% in the placebo arm. Serious AEs occurred in 43% and 33%, respectively. There were no fatal AEs in the ibrutinib arm and three in the rituximab arm.
Ibrutinib is jointly developed and commercialized by Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie company, and Janssen Biotech.
Combo treatment yields MRD-negative remissions in CLL
The combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia shows a high overall response rate and compares favorably with established therapies, according to a new report.
The ongoing, open-label, phase 2 study examined the outcomes of six induction cycles, followed by up to 24 months of maintenance treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax, in 66 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) had treatment-naive and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.
After an initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, followed by the obinutuzumab and venetoclax treatment, researchers observed an overall response rate of 95%. By the end of the induction phase, all the treatment-naive patients responded, as did 90% of the relapsed or refractory patients. Five patients had achieved complete remission and 55 patients had a partial response, the researchers reported in Lancet Oncology.
By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival was 100% among treatment-naive patients, while progression-free survival was 83% and overall survival was 90% among the relapsed or refractory patients at this point.
Researchers observed minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% of treatment-naive patients and 83% of relapsed or refractory patients.
The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab was chosen based on earlier trial data, which suggested a synergy between venetoclax and the less-potent anti-CD20 antibody rituximab.
Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her coauthors described the efficacy of the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination as “encouraging.”
“The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab yields fast responses with MRD-negative remissions in most patients,” they wrote. “Based on the experience with venetoclax combined with rituximab in another trial and with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in this and another study, these deep, MRD-negative remissions seem to last for a substantial time after treatment termination.”
Of the 677 adverse events, 427 (63%) were deemed to be related to the study treatment, and 69 of these were serious adverse events.
The most common of these were infections, experienced by four patients during the debulking with bendamustine, and 18 cases in 11 patients during the induction treatment. This included pneumonia, sepsis and cytomegalovirus infection, as well as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
Six patients also experienced infusion-related reactions, four had coronary artery disorder – one during debulking and three during induction – and there were three cases of neoplasms.
Five patients in the relapsed or refractory group died; three of sepsis related to study treatment, and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.
“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.
The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.
SOURCE: Cramer P et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30414-5.
The combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia shows a high overall response rate and compares favorably with established therapies, according to a new report.
The ongoing, open-label, phase 2 study examined the outcomes of six induction cycles, followed by up to 24 months of maintenance treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax, in 66 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) had treatment-naive and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.
After an initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, followed by the obinutuzumab and venetoclax treatment, researchers observed an overall response rate of 95%. By the end of the induction phase, all the treatment-naive patients responded, as did 90% of the relapsed or refractory patients. Five patients had achieved complete remission and 55 patients had a partial response, the researchers reported in Lancet Oncology.
By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival was 100% among treatment-naive patients, while progression-free survival was 83% and overall survival was 90% among the relapsed or refractory patients at this point.
Researchers observed minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% of treatment-naive patients and 83% of relapsed or refractory patients.
The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab was chosen based on earlier trial data, which suggested a synergy between venetoclax and the less-potent anti-CD20 antibody rituximab.
Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her coauthors described the efficacy of the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination as “encouraging.”
“The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab yields fast responses with MRD-negative remissions in most patients,” they wrote. “Based on the experience with venetoclax combined with rituximab in another trial and with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in this and another study, these deep, MRD-negative remissions seem to last for a substantial time after treatment termination.”
Of the 677 adverse events, 427 (63%) were deemed to be related to the study treatment, and 69 of these were serious adverse events.
The most common of these were infections, experienced by four patients during the debulking with bendamustine, and 18 cases in 11 patients during the induction treatment. This included pneumonia, sepsis and cytomegalovirus infection, as well as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
Six patients also experienced infusion-related reactions, four had coronary artery disorder – one during debulking and three during induction – and there were three cases of neoplasms.
Five patients in the relapsed or refractory group died; three of sepsis related to study treatment, and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.
“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.
The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.
SOURCE: Cramer P et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30414-5.
The combination of the anti-CD20 antibody obinutuzumab and venetoclax in chronic lymphocytic leukemia shows a high overall response rate and compares favorably with established therapies, according to a new report.
The ongoing, open-label, phase 2 study examined the outcomes of six induction cycles, followed by up to 24 months of maintenance treatment with obinutuzumab and venetoclax, in 66 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Of the 63 patients included in the efficacy analysis, 34 (54%) had treatment-naive and 29 (46%) had relapsed or refractory disease.
After an initial debulking with two cycles of bendamustine, followed by the obinutuzumab and venetoclax treatment, researchers observed an overall response rate of 95%. By the end of the induction phase, all the treatment-naive patients responded, as did 90% of the relapsed or refractory patients. Five patients had achieved complete remission and 55 patients had a partial response, the researchers reported in Lancet Oncology.
By 15 months, both progression-free and overall survival was 100% among treatment-naive patients, while progression-free survival was 83% and overall survival was 90% among the relapsed or refractory patients at this point.
Researchers observed minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the peripheral blood of 91% of treatment-naive patients and 83% of relapsed or refractory patients.
The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab was chosen based on earlier trial data, which suggested a synergy between venetoclax and the less-potent anti-CD20 antibody rituximab.
Paula Cramer, MD, from the German CLL Study Group at University Hospital, Cologne, and her coauthors described the efficacy of the venetoclax and obinutuzumab combination as “encouraging.”
“The combination of venetoclax and obinutuzumab yields fast responses with MRD-negative remissions in most patients,” they wrote. “Based on the experience with venetoclax combined with rituximab in another trial and with venetoclax and obinutuzumab in this and another study, these deep, MRD-negative remissions seem to last for a substantial time after treatment termination.”
Of the 677 adverse events, 427 (63%) were deemed to be related to the study treatment, and 69 of these were serious adverse events.
The most common of these were infections, experienced by four patients during the debulking with bendamustine, and 18 cases in 11 patients during the induction treatment. This included pneumonia, sepsis and cytomegalovirus infection, as well as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
Six patients also experienced infusion-related reactions, four had coronary artery disorder – one during debulking and three during induction – and there were three cases of neoplasms.
Five patients in the relapsed or refractory group died; three of sepsis related to study treatment, and two from unrelated Richter’s transformation.
“With three deaths from sepsis in 66 enrolled patients, the treatment-related mortality seems high; however, in cases of low patient numbers, a few patients can have a substantial effect on the overall results,” the researchers wrote.
The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.
SOURCE: Cramer P et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30414-5.
FROM LANCET ONCOLOGY
Key clinical point:
Major finding: The overall response rate for obinutuzumab plus venetoclax in CLL was 95%.
Study details: An ongoing, phase 2, open-label trial in 66 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Disclosures: The study was funded by F Hoffmann-La Roche and AbbVie. Several authors reported research funding, grants, honoraria, and other support from the pharmaceutical industry, including from the study sponsors.
Source: Cramer P et al. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug 13. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30414-5.
Meta-analysis supports rituximab maintenance in MCL
albeit with the trade-off of higher risk of neutropenia, according to results of a meta-analysis reported in HemaSphere.
Investigators led by Liat Vidal, MD, of Tel-Aviv University, analyzed data from six randomized controlled trials of maintenance therapy including 858 patients with MCL who had a complete or partial response to induction therapy. The maintenance therapy was rituximab in five trials and bortezomib (Velcade) in one trial. The median duration of follow-up was 26-59 months across trials.
Main results showed that, compared with patients who were simply observed or given maintenance interferon-alfa, those given maintenance rituximab had a significantly reduced risk of progression or death (pooled hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.73) and a nonsignificantly reduced risk of death (pHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.06).
Rituximab maintenance therapy was associated with a doubling of the risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (risk ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.50-2.73). However, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to risks of infection, or grade 3 or 4 anemia or thrombocythemia.
None of the included trials reported on quality of life outcomes.
The lone trial of bortezomib maintenance did not find any significant event-free survival or overall survival benefit.
“Based on our results, rituximab maintenance is recommended after immunochemotherapy with R-CHOP or cytarabine-containing induction in the front-line setting for transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients, and after R-CHOP in the relapse setting. It is unclear if maintenance is of benefit after different induction chemotherapy such as bendamustine or fludarabine,” Dr. Vidal and coauthors conclude. “By contrast, current data does not support improved outcomes with bortezomib maintenance for MCL patients.”
Dr. Vidal disclosed that she is an employee of Syneos Health. The study received no funding.
SOURCE: Vidal L et al. HemaSphere. 2018 Aug;2(4):e136.
albeit with the trade-off of higher risk of neutropenia, according to results of a meta-analysis reported in HemaSphere.
Investigators led by Liat Vidal, MD, of Tel-Aviv University, analyzed data from six randomized controlled trials of maintenance therapy including 858 patients with MCL who had a complete or partial response to induction therapy. The maintenance therapy was rituximab in five trials and bortezomib (Velcade) in one trial. The median duration of follow-up was 26-59 months across trials.
Main results showed that, compared with patients who were simply observed or given maintenance interferon-alfa, those given maintenance rituximab had a significantly reduced risk of progression or death (pooled hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.73) and a nonsignificantly reduced risk of death (pHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.06).
Rituximab maintenance therapy was associated with a doubling of the risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (risk ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.50-2.73). However, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to risks of infection, or grade 3 or 4 anemia or thrombocythemia.
None of the included trials reported on quality of life outcomes.
The lone trial of bortezomib maintenance did not find any significant event-free survival or overall survival benefit.
“Based on our results, rituximab maintenance is recommended after immunochemotherapy with R-CHOP or cytarabine-containing induction in the front-line setting for transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients, and after R-CHOP in the relapse setting. It is unclear if maintenance is of benefit after different induction chemotherapy such as bendamustine or fludarabine,” Dr. Vidal and coauthors conclude. “By contrast, current data does not support improved outcomes with bortezomib maintenance for MCL patients.”
Dr. Vidal disclosed that she is an employee of Syneos Health. The study received no funding.
SOURCE: Vidal L et al. HemaSphere. 2018 Aug;2(4):e136.
albeit with the trade-off of higher risk of neutropenia, according to results of a meta-analysis reported in HemaSphere.
Investigators led by Liat Vidal, MD, of Tel-Aviv University, analyzed data from six randomized controlled trials of maintenance therapy including 858 patients with MCL who had a complete or partial response to induction therapy. The maintenance therapy was rituximab in five trials and bortezomib (Velcade) in one trial. The median duration of follow-up was 26-59 months across trials.
Main results showed that, compared with patients who were simply observed or given maintenance interferon-alfa, those given maintenance rituximab had a significantly reduced risk of progression or death (pooled hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.73) and a nonsignificantly reduced risk of death (pHR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.06).
Rituximab maintenance therapy was associated with a doubling of the risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (risk ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.50-2.73). However, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to risks of infection, or grade 3 or 4 anemia or thrombocythemia.
None of the included trials reported on quality of life outcomes.
The lone trial of bortezomib maintenance did not find any significant event-free survival or overall survival benefit.
“Based on our results, rituximab maintenance is recommended after immunochemotherapy with R-CHOP or cytarabine-containing induction in the front-line setting for transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients, and after R-CHOP in the relapse setting. It is unclear if maintenance is of benefit after different induction chemotherapy such as bendamustine or fludarabine,” Dr. Vidal and coauthors conclude. “By contrast, current data does not support improved outcomes with bortezomib maintenance for MCL patients.”
Dr. Vidal disclosed that she is an employee of Syneos Health. The study received no funding.
SOURCE: Vidal L et al. HemaSphere. 2018 Aug;2(4):e136.
FROM HEMASPHERE
Key clinical point: Rituximab maintenance therapy improves outcomes in patients with MCL.
Major finding: Compared with observation or maintenance interferon-alfa, maintenance rituximab was associated with reduced risk of progression-free survival events (HR, 0.58) and increased risk of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (RR, 2.02).
Study details: A meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials including 858 patients with MCL who had a response to induction therapy.
Disclosures: Dr. Vidal disclosed that she is an employee of Syneos Health. The study received no funding.
Source: Vidal L et al. HemaSphere. 2018 Aug;2(4):e136.