Conference Coverage

Exploratory analysis provides support for Recurrence Score

View on the News

Short follow-up precludes definitive findings

The key question about the genetic signatures of breast cancers obtained using tests like the Recurrence Score is whether gene-expression profiles provide useful information about the efficacy of currently-available treatment options. Before we start using assessment tools like Recurrence Score we need to see their value proven in prospective, randomized trials.

Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Jonas Bergh

Our patients face a significant risk from recurrence if we prematurely use analyses like the Recurrence Score to guide treatment decisions. The 5-year median follow-up reported by Dr. Gluz is too short to produce completely reliable results.

I am concerned about the potential for undertreating patients by withholding chemotherapy from patients with a low Recurrence Score who also have one to three positive lymph nodes. We must intelligently balance the appeal of avoiding potentially toxic chemotherapy regimens against the risk for recurrence that patients could face if they don’t receive the chemotherapy regimen they require.

Dr. Jonas Bergh is a professor of oncology-pathology at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm. He had no relevant disclosures. He made these comments as designated discussant for Dr. Gluz’s report.


 

AT EBCC10

References

AMSTERDAM – A 21-gene expression assessment tool may identify selected breast cancer patients who can safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy, according to an exploratory analysis of data collected on Recurrence Scores and 5-year disease-free survival in a multicenter German trial primarily designed to compare different chemotherapy regimens.

Dr. Oleg Gluz Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Oleg Gluz

Recurrence Score joined nodal status, stage, and grade as one of the four prognostic factors that each significantly linked with 5-year disease-free survival in a multivariate-adjusted analysis of 2,642 women with HER2-negative and hormone-receptor positive primary breast cancer, Dr. Oleg Gluz said at the European Breast Cancer Congress. Patients with a low Recurrence Score of 0-11 (on a scale of 0-100) had a 94% rate of disease-free survival during a median 55 months of follow-up when the vast majority of these patients received hormonal therapy only and no chemotherapy, said Dr. Gluz, an oncologist at the Breast Center Niederrhein of Evangelical Hospital Bethesda in Moenchengladbach, Germany. The Recurrence Score is calculated based on results from a RNA-based gene expression test known as Oncotype DX.

A Recurrence Score gene expression profile of 0-11 occurred in 18% of the screened patients, and 86% of these patients accepted the option of no chemotherapy. An additional 30% of the study group had a Recurrence Score of 12-18, and 30% had a score of 19-25, and all these patients with scores of 12-25 collectively had a 94% rate of disease-free survival following chemotherapy during a median 55 months of follow-up. Assigning all these patients with scores of 12-25 likely represents “overtreatment” for patients who also had negative lymph nodes or minimal lymph node involvement, Dr. Gluz said. In the remaining 22% of patients, who had Recurrence Scores of 26 or greater at baseline, the rate of disease-free survival after chemotherapy with a median 55 -month follow-up was 84%, Dr. Gluz reported.

Dr. Angelo Di Leo Mitchel L. Zoler/Frontline Medical News

Dr. Angelo Di Leo

These findings were consistent with an earlier report of disease-free survival after a median 3-year follow-up in the same patients, who were randomized to different chemotherapy alternatives in the PlanB trial, a phase III study primarily designed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of two chemotherapy alternatives in patients with high-risk clinical features including either positive lymph nodes or a high-risk clinical profile despite having negative lymph nodes (J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 29. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5383). They were also consistent with published 5-year disease-free survival results from a prospective evaluation of the Recurrence Score in more than 10,000 women with node-negative, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) study (New Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373 [21]:2005-14).

“These results are interesting and provocative, but are not yet practice changing because in these high-risk patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors, relapses can occur several years after treatment so we need to wait for longer follow-up,” commented Dr. Angelo Di Leo, head of medical oncology at Prato (Italy) Hospital. He also cited the need to wait for results from several prospective, randomized trials now in progress that are more directly addressing the role of genetic profiling in predicting patient prognosis and treatment responses.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Recommended Reading

A Perfect Storm: Patterns of care
MDedge Internal Medicine
Ultrasound bested tomosynthesis for screening dense breast tissue
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Focused breast cancer radiation maintains efficacy, cuts AEs
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Physicians must counsel women on mastectomy misperceptions
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Dr. Ann Partridge discusses counseling young breast cancer patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Advice varies for chemoprevention, genetic testing in invasive breast cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Breast cancer surgery choice depends on the individual
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Counseling patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Carefully consider impact of MRI to detect contralateral breast cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: Treat most older women with stage I breast cancer with lumpectomy only
MDedge Internal Medicine