Conference Coverage

PPI cuts GI events from low- and high-dose aspirin

View on the News

Clinicians underutilize PPIs for low-dose aspirin

The new analysis of COGENT provides important insights into patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. The data show that patients on low-dose aspirin do not have an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and that patients who take low-dose aspirin still face a significant risk for upper-gastrointestinal events. Patients taking low-dose aspirin have about the same rate of upper-GI events as patients on high-dose aspirin.

The issue of GI safety for patients on low-dose aspirin as part of dual-antiplatelet therapy has been long overshadowed by concern over a hypothetical interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors. The issue has also been distorted by a false sense of security that when patients receive low-dose aspirin they do not require protection against GI events.

Treatment of patients taking low-dose aspirin with a PPI is underutilized. The confirmation this analysis provides, that PPI treatment gives GI protection without causing an excess of cardiovascular events, calls for a change in current practice when clinicians prescribe low-dose aspirin. I’m concerned by the apparent lack of enthusiasm by clinicians to prescribe PPIs to their patients on low-dose aspirin despite their significant risk for GI events. The real question is whether all patients on low-dose aspirin should receive a PPI long term or only the subgroup of patients with high risk for an upper-GI bleed.

Dr. Michael E. Farkouh is a cardiologist at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. He has no disclosures. He made these comments in an editorial that accompanied the published report (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 April 12;67[14]:1672-3).


 

AT ACC 2016

References

The only caveat Dr. Vaduganathan placed on PPI use was that the COGENT data addressed only 6 months of PPI use; the safety of longer-term use has not been studied. But “the trend is to use PPIs for as short a period as possible,” and the risk for adverse effects from PPI treatment on cardiovascular disease events is likely greatest during the first 6 months of PPI treatment, he noted. If PPI treatment needs to continue beyond 6 months, he suggested systematically reassessing the risk-benefit balance for individual patients from continued PPI treatment every 3 months.*

*Changes were made to this story on 4/20/2016.

mzoler@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @mitchelzoler

Pages

Recommended Reading

Early antiarrhythmic drugs boost survival in shock-refractory cardiac arrest
MDedge Internal Medicine
Stem cells show heart failure benefits in phase II trial
MDedge Internal Medicine
Novel drug fails to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA approves first leadless pacemaker
MDedge Internal Medicine
USPSTF updates guideline for preventive aspirin therapy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Drug-eluting stent recipients can safely have surgery sooner
MDedge Internal Medicine
Standard incubation can miss P. acnes in infective endocarditis
MDedge Internal Medicine
VIDEO: HOPE-3 bolsters primary prevention in intermediate-risk patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
DANAMI 3-iPOST: No significant benefit with ischemic postconditioning after STEMI
MDedge Internal Medicine
Ticagrelor cuts post-MI events in diabetes patients
MDedge Internal Medicine