Feature

Diabetes drugs with cardiovascular benefits broaden cardiology’s turf


 

The main EMPA-REG outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. This positive outcome in favor of empagliflozin treatment was primarily driven by a difference in the rate of cardiovascular death. In the new analysis, the relative reduction in cardiovascular deaths with empagliflozin compared with placebo was 29% among patients with prevalent heart failure at baseline, 35% among those who had an incident heart failure hospitalization during follow-up, 27% among patients with an incident heart failure episode diagnosed by an investigator during follow-up, 33% among the combined group of trial patients with any form of heart failure at trial entry or during the trial (those with prevalent heart failure at baseline plus those with an incident event), and 37% among the large number of patients in the trial who remained free from any indication of heart failure during follow-up.

In short, treatment with empagliflozin “reduced cardiovascular mortality by the same relative amount” regardless of whether patients did or did not have heart failure during the trial,” Dr. Fitchett concluded.

Additional secondary analyses from EMPA-REG reported at the ESC congress in August also documented that the benefit from empagliflozin treatment was roughly the same regardless of the age of patients enrolled in the trial and regardless of patients’ blood level of LDL cholesterol at entry into the study. These findings provide “confidence in the consistency of the effect” by empagliflozin, Dr. Fitchett said.

The endocrinologists’ view

Dr. Paul S. Jellinger

Dr. Paul S. Jellinger

“Any effort that widens the number of appropriate patients who receive antidiabetic medications is welcome,” said Paul S. Jellinger, MD, reflecting the view of all endocrinologists asked about it. They also all agreed with Dr. Jellinger when he added that antidiabetic drugs, particularly the newer drugs, “have important subtleties and warnings that must be clearly understood,” and endocrinologists are the best source for that information.

“Most cardiologists are not thoroughly familiar with the full palette of medications for hyperglycemia. Selection of medication should not be made solely on the basis of results from a cardiovascular outcomes trial,” said Helena W. Rodbard, MD, a clinical endocrinologist in Rockville, Md.

Dr. Helena W. Rodbard

Dr. Helena W. Rodbard

Cardiologists “do not necessarily know the adverse effects and appropriate dosing” for antidiabetic drugs; a better approach would be a cardiologist and endocrinologist working together, said Philip Levy, MD, a clinical endocrinologist with Banner-University Medical Center in Phoenix.

“The EMPA-REG OUTCOMES and LEADER results are very exciting and encouraging. When all other factors are equal, the cardiovascular results could sway the decision about which medication to use. But an endocrinologist is in the best position to balance the many factors when choosing combination therapy and to set a target level for HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and postprandial glucose, and to adjust therapy to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia,” Dr. Rodbard said in an interview.

Dr. Philip Levy

Dr. Philip Levy

The role for a cardiologist “depends on who is treating the patient,” said Richard Hellman, MD, a clinical endocrinologist in North Kansas City, Mo. If the patient is also seen by an endocrinologist, “I’d like to think the endocrinologist has a plan for glycemic control. I wouldn’t object if the cardiologist sent a note” explaining why adding a drug like empagliflozin to a patient’s regimen might be a good idea. Dr. Hellman said he has received notes like this.

He called empagliflozin a drug with “interesting promise,” especially for patients with incipient heart failure. The extra cardiovascular benefit from the GLP-1 analogues is “less settled,” although the liraglutide and semaglutide trial results are important and mean these drugs need more consideration and study. The EMPA-REG results were more clearly positive, he said.

Dr. Richard Hellman

Dr. Richard Hellman

“We are now much more comfortable using empagliflozin in patients with cardiovascular risk, especially for heart failure,” Dr. Hellman said in an interview. Metformin remains the first-line drug for most patients, but empagliflozin is an appropriate drug to add for selected patients with high cardiovascular risk.

“Metformin is still the initial drug” for most patients with type 2 diabetes, echoed Dr. Levy. Drugs like empagliflozin and liraglutide are usually used in combination with metformin.

“Like many endocrinologists, I have for some time used the oral SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues in combination with metformin. It made sense before the recent cardiovascular data appeared, and it makes even more sense now,” said Dr. Jellinger, professor of clinical medicine and an endocrinologist at the University of Miami.

“Endocrinologists and diabetologists are aware that cardiologists have been taking a larger role in the care of patients with diabetes,” noted Dr. Rodbard. “I favor cardiologists and endocrinologists working in concert to improve the care of patients with diabetes.”

“Over the next few years, we will need to decide whether to treat patients with type 2 diabetes with an agent with proven benefits,” said Dr. Fitchett. “Until the results from EMPA-REG and the LEADER trial came out, there was no specific glucose-lowering agent that also reduced cardiovascular events. Some cardiologists might ask when they should get involved in managing patients with type 2 diabetes. What I would do for patients with a history of cardiovascular disease who develop new type 2 diabetes is start empagliflozin as their first drug,” Dr. Fitchett said, though he admitted that no evidence yet exists to back that approach.

The EMPA-REG trial was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim and by Eli Lilly, the companies that market empagliflozin. The LEADER trial was sponsored in part by Novo Nordisk, the company that markets liraglutide. Dr. Fitchett and Dr. Mentz were both researchers for EMPA-REG. Dr. Fitchett has been a consultant to AstraZeneca, Merck, and Amgen. Dr. Mentz has been an adviser to Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. Fonarow has been an adviser to Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, and ZS Pharma. Dr. Bozkurt had no disclosures. Dr. Bonow has been a consultant to Gilead. Dr. Jellinger has been a speaker on behalf of Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Merck, and Janssen. Dr. Rodbard has been a consultant to or speaker for several drug companies including Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk. Dr. Levy has been a speaker on behalf of Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Hellman had no disclosures.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Reimbursement hurdles hinder Entresto use in HFrEF
MDedge Internal Medicine
Heart failure risk with individual NSAIDs examined in study
MDedge Internal Medicine
Elevated troponins are serious business, even without an MI
MDedge Internal Medicine
Palliative care boosts heart failure patient outcomes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Beta-blockers curb death risk in patients with primary prevention ICD
MDedge Internal Medicine
TOPCAT, a third time around
MDedge Internal Medicine
Advanced heart failure symptoms linked to mortality
MDedge Internal Medicine
Adaptive servo ventilation cuts atrial fib burden
MDedge Internal Medicine
Heart failure targets African Americans
MDedge Internal Medicine
Rheumatoid arthritis increases heart failure risk
MDedge Internal Medicine