News

Tort Reform Should Address Reasons Why People Sue


 

ALEXANDRIA, VA. — Traditional tort reform measures like damage caps won't address some of the fundamental problems with the medical liability system, experts said at a meeting on patient safety and medical liability sponsored by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.

To deal with the current malpractice situation, the medical community needs to address the reasons why people sue—injuries, unmet expenses, and anger, said Lucian L. Leape, M.D., of the department of health policy and management at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.

“The main reason most people sue is because they are angry at the physician,” Dr. Leape said.

But the current system and the most commonly proposed reforms, such as damage caps, don't address the need to increase disclosure of errors to patients or incentivize physicians to offer apologies, he said.

In the current tort system, filing a lawsuit is often the only way that patients feel they can get information about what happened to them or impose a penalty on the physician, said Michelle Mello, Ph.D., also of the department of health policy and management at the Harvard School of Public Health.

But this process often fails to secure an admission of responsibility or an apology, she said.

Traditional reforms such as caps would undercompensate seriously injured patients and increase administrative costs, Dr. Mello said. But they would not help deter medical malpractice, she said.

Damage caps also fail to address the poor correlation between medical injury and malpractice claims, she said. Instead of focusing on caps, the medical community needs to consider an administrative compensation system to replace torts.

The malpractice system is “blocking efforts at patient safety,” said Troyen A. Brennan, M.D., professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston, and professor of law and public health at the Harvard School of Public Health.

A new system should be established to separate compensation for injuries from deterrence, he said. In order to do that, liability for negligence has to be eliminated, and reporting has to be made based on patient injury.

“You have to enable open and honest reporting,” Dr. Brennan said.

And physicians have to realize that reporting patient injury is part of their professional responsibility, he said.

Currently, some physicians do not disclose errors or injuries. It's a rational economic response to their rising premiums and fear of being sued, he said, but it's not an ethical response.

Recommended Reading

EDs Bring Profits, Not Just Patients, to Hospitals
MDedge Internal Medicine
Full-Time Work No Protection From Medical Debt in Families
MDedge Internal Medicine
Data Watch: Lack of Health Insurance Coverage Holds Steady
MDedge Internal Medicine
Chronic Care Model to Be Tested in Pilot Project
MDedge Internal Medicine
Policy & Practice
MDedge Internal Medicine
Medicaid Success Story: Family Planning Initiatives
MDedge Internal Medicine
Most N.J. Welfare Recipients Are Unaware of Family Planning Rule
MDedge Internal Medicine
Does Medicaid Managed Care Deliver Savings?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Telemedicine Helps Elderly Avoid Nursing Home : Rural elderly received 'virtual visits' from home health care nurses via two-way videoconferencing.
MDedge Internal Medicine
Doctor-Patient E-mails Are Efficient Way to Enhance Communications
MDedge Internal Medicine