From the Journals

USPSTF: No thyroid cancer screening for asymptomatic adults

View on the News

Harms clearly outweigh benefits

The rationale for recommending against screening asymptomatic people for thyroid cancer is compelling, and the evidence clearly points to the harms outweighing the benefits.

But that doesn’t mean that the conversation about screening should stop. What the field needs is not a better means to detect thyroid nodules, but a noninvasive measure to distinguish nodules whose cells will leave the thyroid capsule and cause morbidity from nodules whose cells will not. That will spare patients with indolent cancers from unnecessary treatment, while steering the minority of patients with more aggressive cancers to early treatment.

Anne R. Cappola, MD, is in the division of endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and is an associate editor of JAMA. She reported having no relevant financial disclosures. Dr. Cappola made these remarks in an editorial accompanying the recommendation statement and the evidence report (JAMA. 2017 May 9;317[18]:1840-1).


 

FROM JAMA

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends against screening asymptomatic adults for thyroid cancer, because the harms of such screening outweigh the benefits, according to a recommendation statement published May 9 in JAMA.

The USPSTF makes recommendations about the effectiveness of specific health care services for patients who don’t have related signs or symptoms. In this case, the recommendation statement addresses screening of adults who have no signs or symptoms of thyroid cancer by using neck palpation or ultrasonography, said Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD, chair of the organization and lead author of the recommendation statement, and her associates (JAMA. 2017 May 9;317[18]:1882-7).

This document is an update of the previous USPSTF recommendation statement issued in 1996 and was undertaken because there have been several major advances related to the disease since that time.

However, despite a comprehensive review of the current literature, the group found no direct evidence supporting a change to their original advice against such screening.

They emphasized that this applies only to asymptomatic adults, not to those who have hoarseness, throat pain, difficulty swallowing, lumps in the neck, swelling, or asymmetry of the neck; nor to those who have a history of exposure to ionizing radiation, a family history of thyroid cancer, or a genetic susceptibility to the disease.

The results of the literature review were summarized in an evidence report by Jennifer S. Lin, MD, of Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Ore., and her associates. They examined 67 studies involving nearly 584,000 patients, including 10 studies that addressed screening test performance, 3 that addressed the possible harms of screening, 2 that addressed treatment benefits, and 52 that addressed treatment harms.

No good-quality studies assessed the net benefit of thyroid cancer screening, nor whether “early” treatment of screen-detected cancers improved patient outcomes. However, the preponderance of evidence suggested that most thyroid cancers detected by screening are indolent.

So, treatment is likely unnecessary but exposes patients to “nontrivial” harms, including an increased risk of second primary malignancy, permanent adverse effects on the salivary glands, laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism, and the need for lifelong thyroid replacement therapy and monitoring for cancer recurrence, Dr. Lin and her associates said in their evidence report (JAMA. 2017 May 9;317[18]:1888-1903).

The task force noted that no professional medical society currently recommends population-based screening for thyroid cancer. The American Cancer Society, American Thyroid Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and American College of Endocrinology all have no specific recommendations for screening asymptomatic patients, while the American Academy of Family Physicians recommends against such screening, said Dr. Bibbins-Domingo, who is also a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and her associates.

Further information regarding the recommendation statement and the evidence report is available at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org.

The USPSTF is an independent voluntary group supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors’ conflict of interest disclosures are available at www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org.

Recommended Reading

Infants’ head circumference larger with PCOS moms on metformin
MDedge Internal Medicine
Death watch intensifies for HDL-based interventions
MDedge Internal Medicine
Coverage denials plague U.S. PCSK9-inhibitor prescriptions
MDedge Internal Medicine
Neurokinin receptor antagonist nearly halves hot flashes
MDedge Internal Medicine
Study shows no adverse events with long-term denosumab in postmenopausal women
MDedge Internal Medicine
Low-calorie sweeteners may allow more glucose to enter fat cells
MDedge Internal Medicine
Just the FRAX: National fracture risks estimated
MDedge Internal Medicine
Postmenopausal hot flashes cut by 93% with novel nonhormonal treatment
MDedge Internal Medicine
Endoscopic weight loss surgery cuts costs, side effects
MDedge Internal Medicine
New evidence bisphosphonates may prevent OA
MDedge Internal Medicine