Feature

HIV prevention: Mandating insurance coverage of PrEP


 

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is valuable enough for the federal government to mandate insurance coverage, a group of experts told the personal finance website WalletHub, but individuals who are at risk for infection may be missing out for other reasons.

The current state of HIV and AIDS by the numbers

The effectiveness of PrEP is clear, those experts said, but 34% of primary care physicians and nurses in the United States are unaware of the preventive regimen, according to the WalletHub report, which also noted that the majority of Americans with AIDS (61%) are not seeing a specialist.

“Even among [men who have sex with men] in the U.S., coverage is only about 10%, which is abysmal. We can and need to do better. If we don’t pay now, we’ll pay later,” Steffanie Strathdee, PhD, associate dean of global health sciences and Harold Simon Professor at the University of California, San Diego, told WalletHub.

Those taking PrEP have a 90% chance of avoiding HIV infection, the report noted.

“Making PrEP available to all is a giant step forward in the fight against HIV. Mandating this critical prevention be covered by all insurance plans makes it part of mainstream medicine and will only increase its use and help prevent HIV acquisition in exposed populations. I can’t think of other low-risk, high-reward prophylaxis for a lifelong disease,” said Sharon Nachman, MD, professor of pediatrics and associate dean for research at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.

To get PrEP covered, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force needs to act, explained Gerald M. Oppenheimer, PhD, MPH, of the department of health policy and management at the City University of New York.

“Under the Affordable Care Act, if the [USPSTF] finds that PrEP serves as an effective prevention to disease and gives it a grade of A or B, all insurers must offer it free. That, of course, may lead to an increase in premiums. This is another example of pharmaceutical companies charging high prices in the U.S., compared to what other countries pay, and cries out for an amendment to Medicare Part D, allowing the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices,” he said.

Recommended Reading

Transgender equality: U.S. physicians must lead the way
MDedge Internal Medicine
Sex workers: High rates of HIV, low rates of treatment
MDedge Internal Medicine
Treating cryptococcal meningitis in patients with HIV
MDedge Internal Medicine
HIV testing low in U.S. women engaged in risky behavior
MDedge Internal Medicine
Pay attention to kidney disease risk in people living with HIV
MDedge Internal Medicine
HIV superinfection: No boost to broadly neutralizing antibodies
MDedge Internal Medicine
Rate of STIs is rising, and many U.S. teens are sexually active
MDedge Internal Medicine
Draft guidelines advise HIV screening for most teens and adults
MDedge Internal Medicine
Temixys plus other antiretrovirals approved for HIV-1
MDedge Internal Medicine
Missed HIV screening opportunities found among subsequently infected youth
MDedge Internal Medicine