From the Journals

Gestational diabetes carries CVD risk years later


 

FROM CIRCULATION

Strong findings argue for more frequent CVD screening

These study results may be the strongest data to date on the long-term effects of GD, said Prakash Deedwania, MD, professor of cardiology at the University of California, San Francisco. “It’s the strongest in the sense in that it’s sponsored, involved four different communities in different parts of the United States, enrolled individuals when they were young and followed them, and saw very few patients drop out for such a long-term study.” The study reported follow-up data on 72% of patients at 25 years, a rate Dr. Deedwania noted was “excellent.”

Dr. Prakash Deedwania of the University of California, San Francisco

Dr. Prakash Deedwania

“Patients who have had GD should be screened aggressively – for not only diabetes, but other cardiovascular risk factors – early on to minimize the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease is a very important point of this study,” he added. In the absence of a clinical guideline, Dr. Deedwania suggested women with GD might have screening for CV risk factors every 5-7 years depending on their risk profile, but emphasized that parameter isn’t settled.

Future research should focus on the link between GD and CVD risk, Dr. Gunderson said. “Research is needed to better characterize the severity of GD in relation to CVD outcomes, and to identify critical pregnancy-related periods to modify cardiometabolic risk.” The latter would include life-course studies across the full pregnancy continuum from preconception to lactation. “Interventions for primary prevention of CVD and the importance of modifiable lifestyle behaviors with the highest relevance to reduce both diabetes and CVD risks during the first year post partum merit increased research investigation,” she added.

Future studies might also explore the role of inflammation in the GD-CVD relationship, Dr. Deedwania said. “My hypothesis is, and it’s purely a hypothesis, that perhaps the presence of coronary artery calcification scores score in these individuals who were described as having normal glucose but who could be at risk could very well be related to the beginning of inflammation.”

Dr. Gunderson and Dr. Deedwania have no financial relationships to disclose. The study was funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Pages

Recommended Reading

COVID-19 fuels surge in overdose-related cardiac arrests
MDedge Internal Medicine
Calcium burden drives CV risk whether coronary disease is obstructive or not
MDedge Internal Medicine
Peripheral neuropathy tied to mortality in adults without diabetes
MDedge Internal Medicine
LDL cholesterol not the primary culprit in ASCVD?
MDedge Internal Medicine
ACC/AHA valvular heart disease update backs less-invasive approach
MDedge Internal Medicine
Ultraprocessed food again linked to increased CVD, death
MDedge Internal Medicine
Large study links brown fat with lower rates of cardiometabolic disease
MDedge Internal Medicine
Severe renal arteriosclerosis may indicate cardiovascular risk in lupus nephritis
MDedge Internal Medicine
Can ‘big’ be healthy? Yes – and no
MDedge Internal Medicine
Large study weighs in on ‘fat but fit’ paradox
MDedge Internal Medicine