Commentary

Universal testing for Lp(a): What are we waiting for?


 

U.S. guidelines need updating

To foster this, U.S. guidelines, which influence every aspect of care, including testing, prevention, treatment, reimbursement, and medical legal issues, need to be simplified. The discussion of Lp(a) testing in the 2018 U.S. guidelines on cholesterol management is already obsolete. The contingencies on when testing is “reasonable” or “may be reasonable” are dated and cumbersome. In contrast, a recommendation to test everyone once, perhaps in adolescence, would be a useful, forward-looking strategy.

To date, trials of an antisense oligonucleotide and a small interfering RNA molecule targeting hepatic LPA messenger RNA have confirmed that plasma Lp(a) levels can be significantly and safely lowered. If the ongoing Lp(a) HORIZON and OCEAN(a) phase 3 trials have positive outcomes in patients with known ASCVD, this would spawn a host of clinical trials to explore the possibilities of these therapies in primary prevention as well. These will require tens of thousands of enrollees, and universal testing would expand the pool of potential participants.

The majority of at-risk individuals identified through universal testing would be candidates for primary prevention. This large, currently unidentified cohort should have all coexisting risk factors assessed and managed; lowering elevated LDL cholesterol early and aggressively is paramount. Recent data from the United Kingdom suggest that attainment of specific LDL cholesterol levels may offset the risk for vascular events in those with high Lp(a) levels.

Of note, this was the advice given to the small fraction of high-risk individuals like me, who had their Lp(a) level tested long before its ominous implications were understood. This recommendation was informed mostly by common sense. For any number of reasons, the same might be said for universal testing.

Dr. Leahy, a retired cardiologist in San Diego, has an abiding professional and personal interest in Lp(a), which has been responsible for a number of cardiovascular events in his own life over the past 2 decades. He was a participant in the phase 2 clinical trial of the Lp(a)-lowering antisense oligonucleotide being studied in the Lp(a) HORIZON trial, funded by Novartis, and is currently undergoing apheresis treatment. A version of this article originally appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

PPI use in type 2 diabetes links with cardiovascular events
MDedge Internal Medicine
Does EPA lower CV risk? REDUCE-IT revisited
MDedge Internal Medicine
Evolocumab’s LDL lowering surpassed inclisiran’s in ORION-3
MDedge Internal Medicine
Geriatrician advises on use of vitamin D supplementation, lecanemab, and texting for her patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
PCSK9 inhibitors for severe COVID? Pilot trial signals of benefit
MDedge Internal Medicine
Canadian guidance recommends reducing alcohol consumption
MDedge Internal Medicine
High HDL-C levels linked to increased fracture risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
More type 2 diabetes deaths from cancer than heart disease
MDedge Internal Medicine
Even one head injury boosts all-cause mortality risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
CV deaths jumped in 2020, reflecting pandemic toll
MDedge Internal Medicine