Latest News

How COVID-19 Treatments Affect Patients With IBD


 

TOPLINE:

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies for patients may need to be briefly halted during treatment for COVID-19, but it does not escalate IBD flares, with prior vaccination for COVID-19 helping reduce complications from the virus.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Patients with IBD who receive immunosuppressive agents are at an increased risk of developing severe SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, the effects of COVID-19 vaccination and treatment on the outcomes in patients with IBD are less known.
  • Researchers assessed the effect of COVID-19 medications in 127 patients with IBD (age ≥ 18 years; 54% women) who were diagnosed with COVID-19 after the advent of vaccines and release of antiviral therapies.
  • Patients were stratified into those who received treatment for COVID-19 (n = 44), defined as the use of antivirals and/or intravenous antibodies, and those who did not receive treatment for COVID-19 (n = 83).
  • The primary outcome was the development of a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection (defined by the need for oxygen supplements, corticosteroids and/or antibiotic treatment, or hospitalization).
  • The secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients who had their IBD therapy withheld and rates of IBD flare post COVID-19.

TAKEAWAY:

  • The likelihood of being treated for COVID-19 was higher in patients on corticosteroids (odds ratio [OR], 4.61; P = .002) or in those undergoing advanced IBD therapies (OR, 2.78; P = .041) prior to infection.
  • Advanced age at the time of infection (adjusted OR [aOR], 1.06; P = .018) and corticosteroid treatment prior to contracting COVID-19 (aOR, 9.86; P = .001) were associated with an increased risk for severe infection.
  • After adjustment for multiple factors, the likelihood of withholding IBD treatment was higher in patients being treated for COVID-19 (aOR, 6.95; P = .007).

IN PRACTICE:

“Patients with IBD on advanced therapies were frequently treated for acute COVID-19. Although COVID-19 treatment was associated with temporary withholding of IBD therapy, it did not result in increased IBD flares,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

The investigation, led by Laura C. Sahyoun, MD, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, was published online in Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

LIMITATIONS:

Owing to the small sample size, the outcomes comparing antivirals to intravenous antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 strain prevalence could not be assessed. This single-center study also may not reflect the different clinical practices pertaining to IBD and COVID-19 treatments.

DISCLOSURES:

The study did not receive any specific funding. One author reported receiving speaker fees and being part of advisory boards, and another author received research support and reported being a part of advisory boards.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Decoding the Gut-Immune Connection During Pregnancy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Does Exercise Reduce Cancer Risk? It’s Just Not That Simple
MDedge Internal Medicine
Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: How Is it Improving Treatment?
MDedge Internal Medicine
AGA Supports Fecal Microbiota Therapies for CDI but Not IBD or IBS
MDedge Internal Medicine
Healthy Lifestyle Linked to Lower Risk for IBS
MDedge Internal Medicine
Higher Dietary Niacin Tied to Lower Mortality Risk in MASLD
MDedge Internal Medicine
Cell-Free DNA Blood Test Has High Accuracy for Detecting Colorectal Cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA Approves First Drug for MASH
MDedge Internal Medicine
New CRC stool test beats FIT for sensitivity but not specificity
MDedge Internal Medicine
Few Childhood Cancer Survivors Get Recommended Screenings
MDedge Internal Medicine