Latest News

Tirzepatide Offers Better Glucose Control, Regardless of Baseline Levels


 

TOPLINE:

Tirzepatide vs basal insulins led to greater improvements in A1c and postprandial glucose (PPG) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), regardless of different baseline PPG or fasting serum glucose (FSG) levels.

METHODOLOGY:

  • Tirzepatide led to better glycemic control than insulin degludec and insulin glargine in the SURPASS-3 and SURPASS-4 trials, respectively, but the effect on FSG and PPG levels was not evaluated.
  • In this post hoc analysis, the researchers assessed changes in various glycemic parameters in 3314 patients with T2D who were randomly assigned to receive tirzepatide (5, 10, or 15 mg), insulin degludec, or insulin glargine.
  • Based on the median baseline glucose values, the patients were stratified into four subgroups: Low FSG/low PPG, low FSG/high PPG, high FSG/low PPG, and high FSG/high PPG.
  • The outcomes of interest were changes in FSG, PPG, A1c, and body weight from baseline to week 52.

TAKEAWAY:

  • Tirzepatide and basal insulins effectively lowered A1c, PPG levels, and FSG levels at 52 weeks across all patient subgroups (all P < .05).
  • All three doses of tirzepatide resulted in greater reductions in both A1c and PPG levels than in basal insulins (all P < .05).
  • In the high FSG/high PPG subgroup, a greater reduction in FSG levels was observed with tirzepatide 10- and 15-mg doses vs insulin glargine (both P < .05) and insulin degludec vs tirzepatide 5 mg (P < .001).
  • Furthermore, at week 52, tirzepatide led to body weight reduction (P < .05), but insulin treatment led to an increase in body weight (P < .05) in all subgroups.

IN PRACTICE:

“Treatment with tirzepatide was consistently associated with more reduced PPG levels compared with insulin treatment across subgroups, including in participants with lower baseline PPG levels, in turn leading to greater A1c reductions,” the authors wrote.

SOURCE:

This study was led by Francesco Giorgino, MD, PhD, of the Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology, and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy, and was published online in Diabetes Care.

LIMITATIONS:

The limitations include post hoc nature of the study and the short treatment duration. The trials included only patients with diabetes and overweight or obesity, and therefore, the study findings may not be generalizable to other populations.

DISCLOSURES:

This study and the SURPASS trials were funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Four authors declared being employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. The other authors declared having several ties with various sources, including Eli Lilly and Company.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Glucose Level Fluctuations Affect Cognition in T1D
MDedge Internal Medicine
Gaps Found in Appropriate SGLT2, GLP-1 Prescribing
MDedge Internal Medicine
Magnesium and Metabolic Syndrome: Any Connection?
MDedge Internal Medicine
The Truth About Compounded GLP-1s That Doctors Need to Know
MDedge Internal Medicine
Can Sweeteners Improve Weight Maintenance, Overeating?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Could Regular, Daytime Naps Increase Glucose Levels?
MDedge Internal Medicine
AI Identifies Two Natural Bioactive GLP-1 Compounds
MDedge Internal Medicine
Experts Aim to Use Brown Fat to Burn Fat More Effectively
MDedge Internal Medicine
‘From Interpretation to Action’: Using CGM to Manage T2D
MDedge Internal Medicine
Do New Antiobesity Meds Still Require Lifestyle Management?
MDedge Internal Medicine