Commentary

Point/Counterpoint – Should the IADPSG criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes be adopted now worldwide?


 

Dr. de Valk and I have reviewed the published arguments for and against changing the diagnostic criteria for GDM now, and we have other concerns, including the timing and poor reproducibility of the OGTT, the reliance on large for gestational age as an endpoint for setting diagnostic criteria, and the increase in use of oral antidiabetic drugs that could result from a vast increase in GDM.

Overall, we agree with the National Institutes of Health panel that real evidence for change is lacking, and that there is a lot to be done before we significantly expand GDM.

Dr. Visser is professor of obstetrics and gynecology at University Medical Center in Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Based on presentations made at the annual meeting of the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of North America, Washington. Both Dr. Coustan and Dr. Visser reported that they had no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Hydrocodone rescheduling: Intended and unintended consequences
MDedge Internal Medicine
Unsuspected primary hyperparathyroidism common in fibromyalgia patients
MDedge Internal Medicine
World’s dialysis burden has grown 165% since 1990
MDedge Internal Medicine
Discharge protocols cut 30-day bariatric surgery readmissions
MDedge Internal Medicine
Abandon LDL targets? Not yet
MDedge Internal Medicine
Gene variant ups chronic kidney disease risk, speeds progression in African Americans
MDedge Internal Medicine
FDA lifts rosiglitazone prescribing restrictions
MDedge Internal Medicine
Chelation plus vitamins halved cardiovascular events in diabetics
MDedge Internal Medicine
Gastric bypass associated with reversal of aging process
MDedge Internal Medicine
Obese and overweight adults lost significant weight on vegetarian, vegan diets
MDedge Internal Medicine