Commentary

Point/Counterpoint – Another surgeon’s error – Must you tell the patient?


 

Dr. Chadrick E. Denlinger

The approach that physicians have previously taken when faced with this dilemma is an important measure of what they believe represents an ethical or just response. A poll of many of my colleagues across the country and at my own institution suggests that the preferred approach is to provide appropriate care for the patient and to answer their questions honestly, but to not proactively disclose the perceived medical error.

In fact, this was the preferred approach of every surgeon who responded.

A recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine addressed this very topic. The authors noted that there is little guidance available regarding the reporting of another physician’s error (2013;369:1752-7).

Among the challenges inherent in disclosing another’s mistake is the difficulty in determining exactly what happened. Uncertainty inevitably exists regarding the conversations that took place between the patient and the surgeon, and also about what actually defines a medical error. Incidents regarded as medical errors may comprise a large spectrum, ranging from "not what I would have done – but within the standard of care," to "blatant negligence."

Several studies suggest that highly trained physicians and surgeons routinely disagree about whether negligence has occurred in a given case. In one study, two reviewers disagreed 38% of the time as to whether appropriate care was provided.

Physicians have difficulty judging if the standard of care has been met. Therefore, it is not acceptable for each of us to assume we are the medical expert capable of rendering an opinion of whether previous care was appropriate and informing patients of our opinion.

Physicians overwhelmingly report that in the event they are responsible for a medical error discovered by another physician, they would prefer that the physician come to them first to discuss the matter. In fact, 93% of 400 respondents in one survey reported this preference.

The most acceptable approach when dealing with a peer’s medical error is to discuss the error with the responsible physician and to encourage the physician to disclose any error with the patient.

If there is disagreement as to whether an error occurred, institutional guidance should be applied. Only a collaborative approach can appropriately meet the needs of the patient and family after harmful medical errors.

Dr. Chadrick E. Denlinger is an associate professor at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Factual and proximate cause
MDedge Internal Medicine
States look to continue Medicaid pay boost on their own
MDedge Internal Medicine
Doctors seek to delay 2014 meaningful use deadlines
MDedge Internal Medicine
Medical home pilot fails to reduce cost, utilization
MDedge Internal Medicine
Meaningful use criteria bolster lung cancer screening program
MDedge Internal Medicine
New guidelines issued for geriatric care in the ED
MDedge Internal Medicine
Stage 2 of meaningful use: Expect tougher objectives, pre-payment audits
MDedge Internal Medicine
CMS launches ICD-10 website for small physician practices
MDedge Internal Medicine
Flexibility – but no passes – on meaningful use Stage 2
MDedge Internal Medicine
Single accreditation for MDs and DOs by 2020
MDedge Internal Medicine