News

Active surveillance underused for indolent prostate cancer

View on the News

Are nonclinical factors influencing treatment decisions?

An examination of patterns of care for prostate cancer are welcome, particularly as there is probably significant underutilization of some treatments and overutilization of others, according to Dr. Sandip M. Prasad and his colleagues.

It is critical to identify predictors of treatment decision making, by both patients and clinicians, as recent studies point to certain nonclinical factors influencing treatment decisions, such as self-referral by urologists to investor-owned facilities. There are concerns that overutilization of expensive treatments may have implications for patient safety, particularly in patients who do not need these treatments.

Dr. Prasadis from the department of urology at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (JAMA Oncol. 2015 Feb. 19 [doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.183]. There were no conflicts of interest declared.


 

FROM JAMA ONCOLOGY

References

Watchful waiting or active surveillance is underused in men with indolent prostate cancer, according to the authors of a study that found radiation therapy was the most common treatment regardless of stage, prostate-specific antigen level, grade, or risk.

The population-based study of 37,261 men with prostate cancer, published in JAMA Oncology, found that the use of watchful waiting or active surveillance increased in men aged over 70, but was significantly lower in men of Asian descent and married men.

Radiation therapy was the most common treatment (57.9%) – followed by radical prostatectomy (19.1% and watching waiting or active surveillance (9.6%) – and its use increased with age, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, and referral to a radiation oncologist (JAMA Oncol. 2015 Feb. 19 [doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.192]).

“Our finding that increased use of radiotherapy among patients with indolent disease portends to a collaborative need for increased dissemination of prostate cancer treatment guidelines among our radiation oncology colleagues,” wrote Dr. Karim Chamie of the University of California, Los Angeles, and coauthors.

The study was supported by the Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Physician Training Award and the National Institutes of Health. No other conflicts of interest were declared.


Recommended Reading

Has advertising for prostate cancer treatment gone too far?
MDedge Internal Medicine
Men on androgen deprivation therapy not getting bisphosphonates
MDedge Internal Medicine
No increase in prostate cancer with testosterone therapy
MDedge Internal Medicine
Prostate cancer surveillance appears safe through 15 years
MDedge Internal Medicine
High serum vitamin D levels linked to prostate cancer risk
MDedge Internal Medicine
Topical androgen use by sexual partner linked to high testosterone in prostate cancer patient
MDedge Internal Medicine
ADT plus RT more effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality than ADT alone in geriatric men
MDedge Internal Medicine
ASCO endorses ACS guidelines for prostate cancer survivor care
MDedge Internal Medicine
Smoking linked to many ‘new’ causes of death
MDedge Internal Medicine
Study confirms value of adding radiotherapy to ADT in advanced prostate cancer
MDedge Internal Medicine