ASH 2014

SAN FRANCISCO– Teens and young adults don’t like being treated like children, but they should make an exception when it comes to acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, because pediatric ALL regimens are associated with significantly better event-free and overall survival among patients with ALL from the ages of 16 to 40 years.

Those findings come from a clinical trial 14 years in the making, in which 296 adolescents and young adults (AYA) with ALL were treated with an intensive pediatric chemotherapy combination regiment rather than a less-intensive adult regimen. At 2-year follow-up, the rate of overall survival (OS) was 78%, with the median overall survival not yet reached, and the event-free survival (EFS) rate was 66%, reported Dr. Wendy Stock from the University of Chicago Medical Center.

In contrast, EFS rates among AYA treated with adult regimens have historically ranged from 35-40%, Dr. Stock said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“These data really started 14 years ago at this ASH meeting when we presented data showing that young adults ages 16 to 20 who were treated on adult cooperative group studies in the United States fared much worse than the same age group who were treated on pediatric studies,” she said.

In 2008, Dr. Stock and her colleagues published a study (Blood 2008;112:1646-54) showing that AYAs treated under Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) protocols had an overall survival rate at 7 years of 67% and an EFS rate of 63%. In contrast, AYAs treated under Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols had an OS of 46% and EFS of only 34%. The risk for worse outcomes was approximately twofold among adolescents treated with adult regimens, compared with those treated with pediatric regimens. The findings were similar in studies from France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, Dr. Stock noted.

The investigators determined at that time that, under the CCG regimens, the teen and young adult patients received earlier and more intensive central nervous system prophylaxis and higher doses of nonmyelosuppressive drugs, especially glucocorticoids, vincristine, and pegylated asparignase, while those on the CALGB regimens received higher doses of myelosuppressive agents such as anthracyclines.

Because their original findings came from a retrospective study, the investigators decided to launch a prospective study,US Intergroup trial C10403, designed to evaluate outcomes among patients with ALL from the ages of 16-40 years when they were treated with a pediatric regimen by adult hematologists/oncologists in the cooperative group setting.

A total of 296 eligible patients with a median age of 25 years were enrolled. The patients had newly diagnosed ALL of T-cell or B-cell lineage; patients with Burkitt’s type ALL or ALL positive for the Philadelphia chromosome were excluded. The patients were treated with a regimen identical to the Capizzi methotrexate arm of the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0232 study. The regimen consisted of four intensive courses: remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance and delayed intensification, and prolonged maintenance therapy. Patients who had an M2 marrow response after remission induction (more than 5% but less than 25% lymphoblasts) received an extended remission induction course of therapy.

As noted before, the EFS rate was 66% and the median EFS duration was 59 months. The 2-year overall survival rate was 79%. EFS rates were similar between patients with B-cell lineage (65%) and T-cell lineage (68%) ALL, and there were no significant differences in EFS or OS by sex or by age.

There were five (2%) treatment-related deaths during protocol therapy, including two cases of liver failure, both occurring during induction; two infections (one in the induction phase and one in the consolidation phase); and one ventricular arrhythmia (during induction). Treatment toxicities in general were similar to those seen in the standard therapy of the COG AALL0232 trial, although patients in the current study had an increase in risk for thrombosis and early hyperbilirubinemia.

“Our outcomes are similar to other prospective international studies which apply pediatric regimens to the young adult population of acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Dr. Stock said.

In analyses of biological factors that affect outcome, the investigators found that white blood cell counts above 30,000/uL were associated with worse EFS and OS, and that the presence of a BCR-ABL1-like signature and overexpression of the gene CRLF2 were common and associated with significantly worse survival.

The investigators plan to use the study as a basis for future studies incorporating target antibodies and kinase inhibitors in an attempt to improve survival further by eradicating minimal residual disease, Dr. Stock said.

SAN FRANCISCO– Teens and young adults don’t like being treated like children, but they should make an exception when it comes to acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, because pediatric ALL regimens are associated with significantly better event-free and overall survival among patients with ALL from the ages of 16 to 40 years.

Those findings come from a clinical trial 14 years in the making, in which 296 adolescents and young adults (AYA) with ALL were treated with an intensive pediatric chemotherapy combination regiment rather than a less-intensive adult regimen. At 2-year follow-up, the rate of overall survival (OS) was 78%, with the median overall survival not yet reached, and the event-free survival (EFS) rate was 66%, reported Dr. Wendy Stock from the University of Chicago Medical Center.

In contrast, EFS rates among AYA treated with adult regimens have historically ranged from 35-40%, Dr. Stock said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“These data really started 14 years ago at this ASH meeting when we presented data showing that young adults ages 16 to 20 who were treated on adult cooperative group studies in the United States fared much worse than the same age group who were treated on pediatric studies,” she said.

In 2008, Dr. Stock and her colleagues published a study (Blood 2008;112:1646-54) showing that AYAs treated under Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) protocols had an overall survival rate at 7 years of 67% and an EFS rate of 63%. In contrast, AYAs treated under Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols had an OS of 46% and EFS of only 34%. The risk for worse outcomes was approximately twofold among adolescents treated with adult regimens, compared with those treated with pediatric regimens. The findings were similar in studies from France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, Dr. Stock noted.

The investigators determined at that time that, under the CCG regimens, the teen and young adult patients received earlier and more intensive central nervous system prophylaxis and higher doses of nonmyelosuppressive drugs, especially glucocorticoids, vincristine, and pegylated asparignase, while those on the CALGB regimens received higher doses of myelosuppressive agents such as anthracyclines.

Because their original findings came from a retrospective study, the investigators decided to launch a prospective study,US Intergroup trial C10403, designed to evaluate outcomes among patients with ALL from the ages of 16-40 years when they were treated with a pediatric regimen by adult hematologists/oncologists in the cooperative group setting.

A total of 296 eligible patients with a median age of 25 years were enrolled. The patients had newly diagnosed ALL of T-cell or B-cell lineage; patients with Burkitt’s type ALL or ALL positive for the Philadelphia chromosome were excluded. The patients were treated with a regimen identical to the Capizzi methotrexate arm of the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0232 study. The regimen consisted of four intensive courses: remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance and delayed intensification, and prolonged maintenance therapy. Patients who had an M2 marrow response after remission induction (more than 5% but less than 25% lymphoblasts) received an extended remission induction course of therapy.

As noted before, the EFS rate was 66% and the median EFS duration was 59 months. The 2-year overall survival rate was 79%. EFS rates were similar between patients with B-cell lineage (65%) and T-cell lineage (68%) ALL, and there were no significant differences in EFS or OS by sex or by age.

There were five (2%) treatment-related deaths during protocol therapy, including two cases of liver failure, both occurring during induction; two infections (one in the induction phase and one in the consolidation phase); and one ventricular arrhythmia (during induction). Treatment toxicities in general were similar to those seen in the standard therapy of the COG AALL0232 trial, although patients in the current study had an increase in risk for thrombosis and early hyperbilirubinemia.

“Our outcomes are similar to other prospective international studies which apply pediatric regimens to the young adult population of acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Dr. Stock said.

In analyses of biological factors that affect outcome, the investigators found that white blood cell counts above 30,000/uL were associated with worse EFS and OS, and that the presence of a BCR-ABL1-like signature and overexpression of the gene CRLF2 were common and associated with significantly worse survival.

The investigators plan to use the study as a basis for future studies incorporating target antibodies and kinase inhibitors in an attempt to improve survival further by eradicating minimal residual disease, Dr. Stock said.

SAN FRANCISCO– Teens and young adults don’t like being treated like children, but they should make an exception when it comes to acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, because pediatric ALL regimens are associated with significantly better event-free and overall survival among patients with ALL from the ages of 16 to 40 years.

Those findings come from a clinical trial 14 years in the making, in which 296 adolescents and young adults (AYA) with ALL were treated with an intensive pediatric chemotherapy combination regiment rather than a less-intensive adult regimen. At 2-year follow-up, the rate of overall survival (OS) was 78%, with the median overall survival not yet reached, and the event-free survival (EFS) rate was 66%, reported Dr. Wendy Stock from the University of Chicago Medical Center.

In contrast, EFS rates among AYA treated with adult regimens have historically ranged from 35-40%, Dr. Stock said at a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“These data really started 14 years ago at this ASH meeting when we presented data showing that young adults ages 16 to 20 who were treated on adult cooperative group studies in the United States fared much worse than the same age group who were treated on pediatric studies,” she said.

In 2008, Dr. Stock and her colleagues published a study (Blood 2008;112:1646-54) showing that AYAs treated under Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) protocols had an overall survival rate at 7 years of 67% and an EFS rate of 63%. In contrast, AYAs treated under Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocols had an OS of 46% and EFS of only 34%. The risk for worse outcomes was approximately twofold among adolescents treated with adult regimens, compared with those treated with pediatric regimens. The findings were similar in studies from France, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, Dr. Stock noted.

The investigators determined at that time that, under the CCG regimens, the teen and young adult patients received earlier and more intensive central nervous system prophylaxis and higher doses of nonmyelosuppressive drugs, especially glucocorticoids, vincristine, and pegylated asparignase, while those on the CALGB regimens received higher doses of myelosuppressive agents such as anthracyclines.

Because their original findings came from a retrospective study, the investigators decided to launch a prospective study,US Intergroup trial C10403, designed to evaluate outcomes among patients with ALL from the ages of 16-40 years when they were treated with a pediatric regimen by adult hematologists/oncologists in the cooperative group setting.

A total of 296 eligible patients with a median age of 25 years were enrolled. The patients had newly diagnosed ALL of T-cell or B-cell lineage; patients with Burkitt’s type ALL or ALL positive for the Philadelphia chromosome were excluded. The patients were treated with a regimen identical to the Capizzi methotrexate arm of the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0232 study. The regimen consisted of four intensive courses: remission induction, remission consolidation, interim maintenance and delayed intensification, and prolonged maintenance therapy. Patients who had an M2 marrow response after remission induction (more than 5% but less than 25% lymphoblasts) received an extended remission induction course of therapy.

As noted before, the EFS rate was 66% and the median EFS duration was 59 months. The 2-year overall survival rate was 79%. EFS rates were similar between patients with B-cell lineage (65%) and T-cell lineage (68%) ALL, and there were no significant differences in EFS or OS by sex or by age.

There were five (2%) treatment-related deaths during protocol therapy, including two cases of liver failure, both occurring during induction; two infections (one in the induction phase and one in the consolidation phase); and one ventricular arrhythmia (during induction). Treatment toxicities in general were similar to those seen in the standard therapy of the COG AALL0232 trial, although patients in the current study had an increase in risk for thrombosis and early hyperbilirubinemia.

“Our outcomes are similar to other prospective international studies which apply pediatric regimens to the young adult population of acute lymphoblastic leukemia,” Dr. Stock said.

In analyses of biological factors that affect outcome, the investigators found that white blood cell counts above 30,000/uL were associated with worse EFS and OS, and that the presence of a BCR-ABL1-like signature and overexpression of the gene CRLF2 were common and associated with significantly worse survival.

The investigators plan to use the study as a basis for future studies incorporating target antibodies and kinase inhibitors in an attempt to improve survival further by eradicating minimal residual disease, Dr. Stock said.

SAN FRANCISCO—Trial results suggest a 3-drug regimen could represent a new standard of care for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), according to a speaker at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

In the phase 3 ASPIRE trial, patients who received combination carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) had superior progression-free survival compared to patients who received only lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd).

There was a trend toward improved overall survival with KRd as well.

Patients who received KRd did experience more adverse events (AEs), but fewer patients discontinued treatment due to AEs in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm.

Keith Stewart, MBChB, of the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 79. The data were published in The New England Journal of Medicine as well. The trial was sponsored by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing carfilzomib.

ASPIRE included 792 patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior treatment regimens. Patients were randomized to treatment with KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396), and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms.

“There was a slight preponderance of patients over the age of 65 in the Rd arm of the trial,” Dr Stewart noted. “Conversely, there were more patients on the Rd arm of the trial who had lower-risk cytogenetics.”

“Patients were also well-balanced for baseline exposure to prior therapies. Prior therapies included transplant in 55% of patients, bortezomib in two-thirds of patients, and lenalidomide in 20% of patients—again, equal in both arms of the trial.”

All patients received a standard dosing schedule of lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22).

Patients in the KRd arm also received carfilzomib (20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m² thereafter). They received a 10-minute infusion of the drug on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Carfilzomib was not given on days 8 and 9 in cycles 13 to 18 and not administered beyond 18 cycles.

‘Unprecedented’ results

The study’s primary endpoint was progression-free survival. And results showed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm—26.3 months and 17.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.69; P<0.0001).

“Progression-free survival was significantly improved by 8.7 months with KRd,” Dr Stewart noted. “In a phase 3 clinical trial setting, this is unprecedented.”

“In all prespecified subgroups, the advantage of KRd in progression-free survival was maintained. That includes age, international staging system, and prior exposure to either bortezomib or lenalidomide, or both drugs.”

The secondary endpoints of the trial were overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response, health-related quality of life, and safety.

The data for median overall survival are not yet mature based on the prespecified statistical boundary at the interim analysis (P=0.005). However, there was a trend in favor of KRd (hazard ratio, 0.79; P=0.018).

The overall response rate was 87.1% with KRd and 66.7% with Rd (P<0.0001), and the complete response rates were 14.1% and 4.3%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of response was 28.6 months and 21.2 months, respectively.

In addition, KRd improved global health-related quality of life compared with Rd over 18 cycles of treatment (P=0.0001).

‘Reassuring’ toxicity data

“In the discussion of adverse events,” Dr Stewart said, “it’s important to note that the median treatment duration was 88 weeks with KRd and 57 weeks with Rd.”

Most patients in each arm experienced at least one AE—96.9% in the KRd arm and 97.2% in the RD arm.

In the KRd arm, 7.7% of patients died while still on treatment or within 30 days of receiving their last dose of treatment, as did 8.5% of patients in the Rd arm. The percentage of deaths attributable to AEs was 6.9% in both arms.

The rates of treatment discontinuation were 69.9% in the KRd arm and 77.9% in the Rd arm. More patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression—39.8% in the KRd arm and 50.1% in the Rd arm—than to AEs—15.3% in the KRd arm and 17.7% in the Rd arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were neutropenia (29.6% vs 26.5%), anemia (17.9% vs 17.2%), and thrombocytopenia (16.6% vs 12.3%).

The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were hypokalemia (9.4% vs 4.9%), fatigue (7.7% vs 6.4%), and diarrhea (3.8% vs 4.1%).

Other treatment-emergent AEs of any grade (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included dyspnea (19.4% vs 14.9%), hypertension (14.3% vs 6.9%), acute renal failure (8.4% vs 7.2%), cardiac failure (6.4% vs 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (5.9% vs 4.6%), and peripheral neuropathy (17.1% vs 17.0%).

“The results [are] very reassuring with respect to cardiac and renal events, which were reported at rates consistent with, or even lower than, those reported in prior studies of single-agent carfilzomib or more heavily pretreated patients,” Dr Stewart said.

“Based on the results of this phase 3 trial, I think it’s fair to say that KRd could represent a new standard of care in relapsed multiple myeloma.”

SAN FRANCISCO—Trial results suggest a 3-drug regimen could represent a new standard of care for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), according to a speaker at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

In the phase 3 ASPIRE trial, patients who received combination carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) had superior progression-free survival compared to patients who received only lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd).

There was a trend toward improved overall survival with KRd as well.

Patients who received KRd did experience more adverse events (AEs), but fewer patients discontinued treatment due to AEs in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm.

Keith Stewart, MBChB, of the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 79. The data were published in The New England Journal of Medicine as well. The trial was sponsored by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing carfilzomib.

ASPIRE included 792 patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior treatment regimens. Patients were randomized to treatment with KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396), and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms.

“There was a slight preponderance of patients over the age of 65 in the Rd arm of the trial,” Dr Stewart noted. “Conversely, there were more patients on the Rd arm of the trial who had lower-risk cytogenetics.”

“Patients were also well-balanced for baseline exposure to prior therapies. Prior therapies included transplant in 55% of patients, bortezomib in two-thirds of patients, and lenalidomide in 20% of patients—again, equal in both arms of the trial.”

All patients received a standard dosing schedule of lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22).

Patients in the KRd arm also received carfilzomib (20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m² thereafter). They received a 10-minute infusion of the drug on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Carfilzomib was not given on days 8 and 9 in cycles 13 to 18 and not administered beyond 18 cycles.

‘Unprecedented’ results

The study’s primary endpoint was progression-free survival. And results showed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm—26.3 months and 17.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.69; P<0.0001).

“Progression-free survival was significantly improved by 8.7 months with KRd,” Dr Stewart noted. “In a phase 3 clinical trial setting, this is unprecedented.”

“In all prespecified subgroups, the advantage of KRd in progression-free survival was maintained. That includes age, international staging system, and prior exposure to either bortezomib or lenalidomide, or both drugs.”

The secondary endpoints of the trial were overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response, health-related quality of life, and safety.

The data for median overall survival are not yet mature based on the prespecified statistical boundary at the interim analysis (P=0.005). However, there was a trend in favor of KRd (hazard ratio, 0.79; P=0.018).

The overall response rate was 87.1% with KRd and 66.7% with Rd (P<0.0001), and the complete response rates were 14.1% and 4.3%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of response was 28.6 months and 21.2 months, respectively.

In addition, KRd improved global health-related quality of life compared with Rd over 18 cycles of treatment (P=0.0001).

‘Reassuring’ toxicity data

“In the discussion of adverse events,” Dr Stewart said, “it’s important to note that the median treatment duration was 88 weeks with KRd and 57 weeks with Rd.”

Most patients in each arm experienced at least one AE—96.9% in the KRd arm and 97.2% in the RD arm.

In the KRd arm, 7.7% of patients died while still on treatment or within 30 days of receiving their last dose of treatment, as did 8.5% of patients in the Rd arm. The percentage of deaths attributable to AEs was 6.9% in both arms.

The rates of treatment discontinuation were 69.9% in the KRd arm and 77.9% in the Rd arm. More patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression—39.8% in the KRd arm and 50.1% in the Rd arm—than to AEs—15.3% in the KRd arm and 17.7% in the Rd arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were neutropenia (29.6% vs 26.5%), anemia (17.9% vs 17.2%), and thrombocytopenia (16.6% vs 12.3%).

The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were hypokalemia (9.4% vs 4.9%), fatigue (7.7% vs 6.4%), and diarrhea (3.8% vs 4.1%).

Other treatment-emergent AEs of any grade (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included dyspnea (19.4% vs 14.9%), hypertension (14.3% vs 6.9%), acute renal failure (8.4% vs 7.2%), cardiac failure (6.4% vs 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (5.9% vs 4.6%), and peripheral neuropathy (17.1% vs 17.0%).

“The results [are] very reassuring with respect to cardiac and renal events, which were reported at rates consistent with, or even lower than, those reported in prior studies of single-agent carfilzomib or more heavily pretreated patients,” Dr Stewart said.

“Based on the results of this phase 3 trial, I think it’s fair to say that KRd could represent a new standard of care in relapsed multiple myeloma.”

SAN FRANCISCO—Trial results suggest a 3-drug regimen could represent a new standard of care for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), according to a speaker at the 2014 ASH Annual Meeting.

In the phase 3 ASPIRE trial, patients who received combination carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) had superior progression-free survival compared to patients who received only lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd).

There was a trend toward improved overall survival with KRd as well.

Patients who received KRd did experience more adverse events (AEs), but fewer patients discontinued treatment due to AEs in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm.

Keith Stewart, MBChB, of the Mayo Clinic in Arizona, presented these results at the meeting as abstract 79. The data were published in The New England Journal of Medicine as well. The trial was sponsored by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the company developing carfilzomib.

ASPIRE included 792 patients with relapsed MM who had received 1 to 3 prior treatment regimens. Patients were randomized to treatment with KRd (n=396) or Rd (n=396), and baseline characteristics were similar between the arms.

“There was a slight preponderance of patients over the age of 65 in the Rd arm of the trial,” Dr Stewart noted. “Conversely, there were more patients on the Rd arm of the trial who had lower-risk cytogenetics.”

“Patients were also well-balanced for baseline exposure to prior therapies. Prior therapies included transplant in 55% of patients, bortezomib in two-thirds of patients, and lenalidomide in 20% of patients—again, equal in both arms of the trial.”

All patients received a standard dosing schedule of lenalidomide (25 mg on days 1-21) and low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22).

Patients in the KRd arm also received carfilzomib (20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and 27 mg/m² thereafter). They received a 10-minute infusion of the drug on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16. Carfilzomib was not given on days 8 and 9 in cycles 13 to 18 and not administered beyond 18 cycles.

‘Unprecedented’ results

The study’s primary endpoint was progression-free survival. And results showed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the KRd arm than in the Rd arm—26.3 months and 17.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio=0.69; P<0.0001).

“Progression-free survival was significantly improved by 8.7 months with KRd,” Dr Stewart noted. “In a phase 3 clinical trial setting, this is unprecedented.”

“In all prespecified subgroups, the advantage of KRd in progression-free survival was maintained. That includes age, international staging system, and prior exposure to either bortezomib or lenalidomide, or both drugs.”

The secondary endpoints of the trial were overall survival, overall response rate, duration of response, health-related quality of life, and safety.

The data for median overall survival are not yet mature based on the prespecified statistical boundary at the interim analysis (P=0.005). However, there was a trend in favor of KRd (hazard ratio, 0.79; P=0.018).

The overall response rate was 87.1% with KRd and 66.7% with Rd (P<0.0001), and the complete response rates were 14.1% and 4.3%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of response was 28.6 months and 21.2 months, respectively.

In addition, KRd improved global health-related quality of life compared with Rd over 18 cycles of treatment (P=0.0001).

‘Reassuring’ toxicity data

“In the discussion of adverse events,” Dr Stewart said, “it’s important to note that the median treatment duration was 88 weeks with KRd and 57 weeks with Rd.”

Most patients in each arm experienced at least one AE—96.9% in the KRd arm and 97.2% in the RD arm.

In the KRd arm, 7.7% of patients died while still on treatment or within 30 days of receiving their last dose of treatment, as did 8.5% of patients in the Rd arm. The percentage of deaths attributable to AEs was 6.9% in both arms.

The rates of treatment discontinuation were 69.9% in the KRd arm and 77.9% in the Rd arm. More patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression—39.8% in the KRd arm and 50.1% in the Rd arm—than to AEs—15.3% in the KRd arm and 17.7% in the Rd arm.

The most common grade 3 or higher hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were neutropenia (29.6% vs 26.5%), anemia (17.9% vs 17.2%), and thrombocytopenia (16.6% vs 12.3%).

The most common grade 3 or higher nonhematologic treatment-emergent AEs (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) were hypokalemia (9.4% vs 4.9%), fatigue (7.7% vs 6.4%), and diarrhea (3.8% vs 4.1%).

Other treatment-emergent AEs of any grade (in the KRd and Rd arms, respectively) included dyspnea (19.4% vs 14.9%), hypertension (14.3% vs 6.9%), acute renal failure (8.4% vs 7.2%), cardiac failure (6.4% vs 4.1%), ischemic heart disease (5.9% vs 4.6%), and peripheral neuropathy (17.1% vs 17.0%).

“The results [are] very reassuring with respect to cardiac and renal events, which were reported at rates consistent with, or even lower than, those reported in prior studies of single-agent carfilzomib or more heavily pretreated patients,” Dr Stewart said.

“Based on the results of this phase 3 trial, I think it’s fair to say that KRd could represent a new standard of care in relapsed multiple myeloma.”

SAN FRANCISCO – Ofatumumab maintenance therapy nearly doubled progression-free survival in patients with relapsed CLL, according to a preplanned interim analysis of the phase III PROLONG study.

At a median follow-up of 19.1 months, progression-free survival was 15.2 months with the standard approach of observation alone and 29.4 months with maintenance ofatumumab (Hazard ratio, 0.50; P < .0001).

Ofatumumab (Arzerra) also significantly increased the median time to next treatment from 31.1 months to 38 months (HR, 0.66; P = .0108), Dr. Marinus van Oers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) with maintenance was “statistically significant and clinical relevant” and was present in all subgroups, he said. It was independent of age, gender, number and type of prior treatment, minimal residual disease status at study entry, and “response at study entry, although we have the impression that it’s more effective in patients on PR [partial response] than in patients on CR [complete response],” he added.

The rationale for the trial lies in the fact that despite recent advances, there is still no curative treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ofatumumab, a type 1 CD20 monoclonal antibody, has a role as maintenance in follicular lymphoma (FL), which shares similarities in biological behavior with CLL. This role is debated, but a recent meta-analysis shows ofatumumab maintenance prolongs PFS and tends to prolong overall survival in relapsed patients with FL, Dr. van Oers of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, observed.

PROLONG randomized 474 patients with relapsed CLL to observation or ofatumumab 300 mg in week 1 and 1,000 mg in week 2, and every 8 weeks for 2 years. All patients were in second or third remission and within 3 months of response assessment after the last reinduction treatment. Patients with refractory disease or prior maintenance therapy or stem cell transplantation were excluded.

At baseline, the median age was about 65 years, 70% had at least two prior treatments, 80% were in partial remission from their last CLL treatment, and less than 10% had poor-risk cytogenetics 11p or 17p deletions. At the time of the analysis, 25% of patients had received all 13 cycles of ofatumumab.

Adverse events of any grade were increased with the addition of ofatumumab versus placebo (86% vs. 72%; P < .0001). Sixty percent were related to study treatment, but none resulted in study withdrawal, Dr. van Oers said. In all, 17 patients on the experimental arm dropped out due to physician decision or patient wish.

Among grade 3 events, neutropenia was significantly increased with maintenance therapy versus placebo (24% vs. 10%; P < .0001) and there was a non-significant increase in infections (13% vs. 8%). Five deaths occurred in the observation arm and two in the ofatumumab arm, one due to sepsis two months after the end of treatment and the other due to unrelated GI obstruction.

Median overall survival has not been reached for either arm (HR, 0.85; P = .487), he reported on behalf of HOVON and the NORDIC CLL group, co-developers of the study.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO – Ofatumumab maintenance therapy nearly doubled progression-free survival in patients with relapsed CLL, according to a preplanned interim analysis of the phase III PROLONG study.

At a median follow-up of 19.1 months, progression-free survival was 15.2 months with the standard approach of observation alone and 29.4 months with maintenance ofatumumab (Hazard ratio, 0.50; P < .0001).

Ofatumumab (Arzerra) also significantly increased the median time to next treatment from 31.1 months to 38 months (HR, 0.66; P = .0108), Dr. Marinus van Oers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) with maintenance was “statistically significant and clinical relevant” and was present in all subgroups, he said. It was independent of age, gender, number and type of prior treatment, minimal residual disease status at study entry, and “response at study entry, although we have the impression that it’s more effective in patients on PR [partial response] than in patients on CR [complete response],” he added.

The rationale for the trial lies in the fact that despite recent advances, there is still no curative treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ofatumumab, a type 1 CD20 monoclonal antibody, has a role as maintenance in follicular lymphoma (FL), which shares similarities in biological behavior with CLL. This role is debated, but a recent meta-analysis shows ofatumumab maintenance prolongs PFS and tends to prolong overall survival in relapsed patients with FL, Dr. van Oers of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, observed.

PROLONG randomized 474 patients with relapsed CLL to observation or ofatumumab 300 mg in week 1 and 1,000 mg in week 2, and every 8 weeks for 2 years. All patients were in second or third remission and within 3 months of response assessment after the last reinduction treatment. Patients with refractory disease or prior maintenance therapy or stem cell transplantation were excluded.

At baseline, the median age was about 65 years, 70% had at least two prior treatments, 80% were in partial remission from their last CLL treatment, and less than 10% had poor-risk cytogenetics 11p or 17p deletions. At the time of the analysis, 25% of patients had received all 13 cycles of ofatumumab.

Adverse events of any grade were increased with the addition of ofatumumab versus placebo (86% vs. 72%; P < .0001). Sixty percent were related to study treatment, but none resulted in study withdrawal, Dr. van Oers said. In all, 17 patients on the experimental arm dropped out due to physician decision or patient wish.

Among grade 3 events, neutropenia was significantly increased with maintenance therapy versus placebo (24% vs. 10%; P < .0001) and there was a non-significant increase in infections (13% vs. 8%). Five deaths occurred in the observation arm and two in the ofatumumab arm, one due to sepsis two months after the end of treatment and the other due to unrelated GI obstruction.

Median overall survival has not been reached for either arm (HR, 0.85; P = .487), he reported on behalf of HOVON and the NORDIC CLL group, co-developers of the study.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO – Ofatumumab maintenance therapy nearly doubled progression-free survival in patients with relapsed CLL, according to a preplanned interim analysis of the phase III PROLONG study.

At a median follow-up of 19.1 months, progression-free survival was 15.2 months with the standard approach of observation alone and 29.4 months with maintenance ofatumumab (Hazard ratio, 0.50; P < .0001).

Ofatumumab (Arzerra) also significantly increased the median time to next treatment from 31.1 months to 38 months (HR, 0.66; P = .0108), Dr. Marinus van Oers reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

The benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) with maintenance was “statistically significant and clinical relevant” and was present in all subgroups, he said. It was independent of age, gender, number and type of prior treatment, minimal residual disease status at study entry, and “response at study entry, although we have the impression that it’s more effective in patients on PR [partial response] than in patients on CR [complete response],” he added.

The rationale for the trial lies in the fact that despite recent advances, there is still no curative treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ofatumumab, a type 1 CD20 monoclonal antibody, has a role as maintenance in follicular lymphoma (FL), which shares similarities in biological behavior with CLL. This role is debated, but a recent meta-analysis shows ofatumumab maintenance prolongs PFS and tends to prolong overall survival in relapsed patients with FL, Dr. van Oers of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, observed.

PROLONG randomized 474 patients with relapsed CLL to observation or ofatumumab 300 mg in week 1 and 1,000 mg in week 2, and every 8 weeks for 2 years. All patients were in second or third remission and within 3 months of response assessment after the last reinduction treatment. Patients with refractory disease or prior maintenance therapy or stem cell transplantation were excluded.

At baseline, the median age was about 65 years, 70% had at least two prior treatments, 80% were in partial remission from their last CLL treatment, and less than 10% had poor-risk cytogenetics 11p or 17p deletions. At the time of the analysis, 25% of patients had received all 13 cycles of ofatumumab.

Adverse events of any grade were increased with the addition of ofatumumab versus placebo (86% vs. 72%; P < .0001). Sixty percent were related to study treatment, but none resulted in study withdrawal, Dr. van Oers said. In all, 17 patients on the experimental arm dropped out due to physician decision or patient wish.

Among grade 3 events, neutropenia was significantly increased with maintenance therapy versus placebo (24% vs. 10%; P < .0001) and there was a non-significant increase in infections (13% vs. 8%). Five deaths occurred in the observation arm and two in the ofatumumab arm, one due to sepsis two months after the end of treatment and the other due to unrelated GI obstruction.

Median overall survival has not been reached for either arm (HR, 0.85; P = .487), he reported on behalf of HOVON and the NORDIC CLL group, co-developers of the study.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO – Early post-transplant brentuximab vedotin dramatically slows Hodgkin’s lymphoma progression in patients at high risk for relapse or progression, the phase III AETHERA study shows.

After a median follow-up of about 28 months, the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review increased from a median of 24 months with placebo and best supportive care (BSC) to 43 months with brentuximab and BSC (Hazard ratio, 0.57; P = .001).

Per investigator assessment, median PFS was 16 months with placebo and had not been reached with brentuximab (HR, 0.50),Dr. Craig Moskowitz reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

The benefit of brentuximab maintenance was consistent across every subgroup. Historically, roughly half of patients who undergo an autologous stem cell transplant will relapse.

“Once this study is published, in patients who met eligibility criteria to be on this study - and once again I’ll remind you that’s remission duration less than one year, disease outside the lymph node system, or primary refractory disease - in my opinion, this will be the standard of care,” Dr. Moskowitz said during a press briefing.

Brentuximab, an anti-CD30 antibody conjugate, is already approved in the U.S. for the management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) after failure of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or at least two prior lines of multi-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for ASCT.

Brentuximab is also indicated for systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

In September it was announced that AETHERA met its primary end point, but this was the first full look at the absolute survival rates and safety data.

The 2-year PFS rate for the brentuximab and placebo groups is now 63% vs. 51% per independent review and 65% vs. 45% per investigator.

“The bottom line is there’s a 20% difference in progression-free survival at 2 years upon investigator review. This has never been seen in patients with relapsed, refractory lymphoma, let alone Hodgkin lymphoma,” Dr. Moskowitz, clinical director of hematology oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, said.

Overall survival data are immature, but was the same in both groups at 2 years (P = .62). The likelihood of showing a survival difference was not expected because 85% of patients who relapsed on the placebo arm crossed over to brentuximab, as allowed per protocol, and it’s known that brentuximab alone in auto-transplant failures improves outcomes by at least a year, he said. Also, twice as many patients who failed placebo received a second transplant.

Dr. Moskowitz stressed that nearly every patient in the trial had at least three risk factors that would place them at high risk of treatment failure and that studies have shown that for patients with this many risk factors, the chance of being cured by an auto-transplant is about 25%. The risk factors are: relapsed less than 12 months or refractory to frontline therapy, best response of partial remission or stable disease to most recent salvage therapy, extranodal disease at pre-ASCT relapse, B symptoms at pre-ASCT relapse, or two or more prior salvage therapies.

Press briefing moderator Dr. Brad Kahl of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said Aethera is the first study to show a significant benefit for a post-transplant strategy.

“The biggest question in my mind is whether the application of maintenance brentuximab vedotin is just delaying the inevitable relapse, so the patients will still relapse, just later, or has the brentuximab taken patients who are destined to relapse and turned them into a cured patient,” Dr. Kahl said. “We don’t know the answer to that question. That will become apparent with more time.”

Dr. Moscowitz observed that relapses almost never happen after two year, adding, “So if you’re in remission at two years after stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma, you are likely to be cured.”

AETHERA enrolled 329 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and randomly assigned them after ASCT to brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg or placebo given every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles, plus BSC. All patients were required to have achieved a complete response, partial remission, or stable disease to salvage therapy prior to ASCT. Their median age was 32 years and 53% were male.

Roughly 60% were refractory to upfront therapy, 43% in the brentuximab arm and 48% of controls had received 2 or more prior systemic therapies, and a third in each arm had extranodal involvement.

Consolidation therapy with brentuximab was generally well tolerated, Dr. Moskowitz said. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most common side effect, experienced at any grade in 67% on brentuximab vs. 19% of controls and at grade 3 in 13% vs. 1%. There were no grade 4 events and 85% of patients had resolution or improvement with dose reductions or stopping the drug.

Other adverse events in the brentuximab and control groups were neutropenia (35% vs. 12%), upper respiratory tract infections (26% vs. 23%), and fatigue (24% vs. 18%). Two patients died within 40 days of dosing with brentuximab, one from treatment-related acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pneumonitis and one following an episode of treatment-related acute pancreatitis that had resolved at the time of death, he reported.

Based on the results, study sponsor Seattle Genetics is expected to seek approval for brentuximab in this consolidation setting in the first half of 2015, according to a statement from the company. The ongoing phase III ECHELON-1 and ECHELON 2 trials in HL and mature T-cell lymphomas are looking at the use of brentuximab in frontline disease.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO – Early post-transplant brentuximab vedotin dramatically slows Hodgkin’s lymphoma progression in patients at high risk for relapse or progression, the phase III AETHERA study shows.

After a median follow-up of about 28 months, the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review increased from a median of 24 months with placebo and best supportive care (BSC) to 43 months with brentuximab and BSC (Hazard ratio, 0.57; P = .001).

Per investigator assessment, median PFS was 16 months with placebo and had not been reached with brentuximab (HR, 0.50),Dr. Craig Moskowitz reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

The benefit of brentuximab maintenance was consistent across every subgroup. Historically, roughly half of patients who undergo an autologous stem cell transplant will relapse.

“Once this study is published, in patients who met eligibility criteria to be on this study - and once again I’ll remind you that’s remission duration less than one year, disease outside the lymph node system, or primary refractory disease - in my opinion, this will be the standard of care,” Dr. Moskowitz said during a press briefing.

Brentuximab, an anti-CD30 antibody conjugate, is already approved in the U.S. for the management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) after failure of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or at least two prior lines of multi-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for ASCT.

Brentuximab is also indicated for systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

In September it was announced that AETHERA met its primary end point, but this was the first full look at the absolute survival rates and safety data.

The 2-year PFS rate for the brentuximab and placebo groups is now 63% vs. 51% per independent review and 65% vs. 45% per investigator.

“The bottom line is there’s a 20% difference in progression-free survival at 2 years upon investigator review. This has never been seen in patients with relapsed, refractory lymphoma, let alone Hodgkin lymphoma,” Dr. Moskowitz, clinical director of hematology oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, said.

Overall survival data are immature, but was the same in both groups at 2 years (P = .62). The likelihood of showing a survival difference was not expected because 85% of patients who relapsed on the placebo arm crossed over to brentuximab, as allowed per protocol, and it’s known that brentuximab alone in auto-transplant failures improves outcomes by at least a year, he said. Also, twice as many patients who failed placebo received a second transplant.

Dr. Moskowitz stressed that nearly every patient in the trial had at least three risk factors that would place them at high risk of treatment failure and that studies have shown that for patients with this many risk factors, the chance of being cured by an auto-transplant is about 25%. The risk factors are: relapsed less than 12 months or refractory to frontline therapy, best response of partial remission or stable disease to most recent salvage therapy, extranodal disease at pre-ASCT relapse, B symptoms at pre-ASCT relapse, or two or more prior salvage therapies.

Press briefing moderator Dr. Brad Kahl of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said Aethera is the first study to show a significant benefit for a post-transplant strategy.

“The biggest question in my mind is whether the application of maintenance brentuximab vedotin is just delaying the inevitable relapse, so the patients will still relapse, just later, or has the brentuximab taken patients who are destined to relapse and turned them into a cured patient,” Dr. Kahl said. “We don’t know the answer to that question. That will become apparent with more time.”

Dr. Moscowitz observed that relapses almost never happen after two year, adding, “So if you’re in remission at two years after stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma, you are likely to be cured.”

AETHERA enrolled 329 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and randomly assigned them after ASCT to brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg or placebo given every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles, plus BSC. All patients were required to have achieved a complete response, partial remission, or stable disease to salvage therapy prior to ASCT. Their median age was 32 years and 53% were male.

Roughly 60% were refractory to upfront therapy, 43% in the brentuximab arm and 48% of controls had received 2 or more prior systemic therapies, and a third in each arm had extranodal involvement.

Consolidation therapy with brentuximab was generally well tolerated, Dr. Moskowitz said. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most common side effect, experienced at any grade in 67% on brentuximab vs. 19% of controls and at grade 3 in 13% vs. 1%. There were no grade 4 events and 85% of patients had resolution or improvement with dose reductions or stopping the drug.

Other adverse events in the brentuximab and control groups were neutropenia (35% vs. 12%), upper respiratory tract infections (26% vs. 23%), and fatigue (24% vs. 18%). Two patients died within 40 days of dosing with brentuximab, one from treatment-related acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pneumonitis and one following an episode of treatment-related acute pancreatitis that had resolved at the time of death, he reported.

Based on the results, study sponsor Seattle Genetics is expected to seek approval for brentuximab in this consolidation setting in the first half of 2015, according to a statement from the company. The ongoing phase III ECHELON-1 and ECHELON 2 trials in HL and mature T-cell lymphomas are looking at the use of brentuximab in frontline disease.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO – Early post-transplant brentuximab vedotin dramatically slows Hodgkin’s lymphoma progression in patients at high risk for relapse or progression, the phase III AETHERA study shows.

After a median follow-up of about 28 months, the primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review increased from a median of 24 months with placebo and best supportive care (BSC) to 43 months with brentuximab and BSC (Hazard ratio, 0.57; P = .001).

Per investigator assessment, median PFS was 16 months with placebo and had not been reached with brentuximab (HR, 0.50),Dr. Craig Moskowitz reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Patrice Wendling/Frontline Medical News

The benefit of brentuximab maintenance was consistent across every subgroup. Historically, roughly half of patients who undergo an autologous stem cell transplant will relapse.

“Once this study is published, in patients who met eligibility criteria to be on this study - and once again I’ll remind you that’s remission duration less than one year, disease outside the lymph node system, or primary refractory disease - in my opinion, this will be the standard of care,” Dr. Moskowitz said during a press briefing.

Brentuximab, an anti-CD30 antibody conjugate, is already approved in the U.S. for the management of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) after failure of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or at least two prior lines of multi-agent chemotherapy in patients ineligible for ASCT.

Brentuximab is also indicated for systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one multi-agent chemotherapy regimen.

In September it was announced that AETHERA met its primary end point, but this was the first full look at the absolute survival rates and safety data.

The 2-year PFS rate for the brentuximab and placebo groups is now 63% vs. 51% per independent review and 65% vs. 45% per investigator.

“The bottom line is there’s a 20% difference in progression-free survival at 2 years upon investigator review. This has never been seen in patients with relapsed, refractory lymphoma, let alone Hodgkin lymphoma,” Dr. Moskowitz, clinical director of hematology oncology at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, said.

Overall survival data are immature, but was the same in both groups at 2 years (P = .62). The likelihood of showing a survival difference was not expected because 85% of patients who relapsed on the placebo arm crossed over to brentuximab, as allowed per protocol, and it’s known that brentuximab alone in auto-transplant failures improves outcomes by at least a year, he said. Also, twice as many patients who failed placebo received a second transplant.

Dr. Moskowitz stressed that nearly every patient in the trial had at least three risk factors that would place them at high risk of treatment failure and that studies have shown that for patients with this many risk factors, the chance of being cured by an auto-transplant is about 25%. The risk factors are: relapsed less than 12 months or refractory to frontline therapy, best response of partial remission or stable disease to most recent salvage therapy, extranodal disease at pre-ASCT relapse, B symptoms at pre-ASCT relapse, or two or more prior salvage therapies.

Press briefing moderator Dr. Brad Kahl of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said Aethera is the first study to show a significant benefit for a post-transplant strategy.

“The biggest question in my mind is whether the application of maintenance brentuximab vedotin is just delaying the inevitable relapse, so the patients will still relapse, just later, or has the brentuximab taken patients who are destined to relapse and turned them into a cured patient,” Dr. Kahl said. “We don’t know the answer to that question. That will become apparent with more time.”

Dr. Moscowitz observed that relapses almost never happen after two year, adding, “So if you’re in remission at two years after stem cell transplantation for Hodgkin lymphoma, you are likely to be cured.”

AETHERA enrolled 329 patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma and randomly assigned them after ASCT to brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg or placebo given every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles, plus BSC. All patients were required to have achieved a complete response, partial remission, or stable disease to salvage therapy prior to ASCT. Their median age was 32 years and 53% were male.

Roughly 60% were refractory to upfront therapy, 43% in the brentuximab arm and 48% of controls had received 2 or more prior systemic therapies, and a third in each arm had extranodal involvement.

Consolidation therapy with brentuximab was generally well tolerated, Dr. Moskowitz said. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most common side effect, experienced at any grade in 67% on brentuximab vs. 19% of controls and at grade 3 in 13% vs. 1%. There were no grade 4 events and 85% of patients had resolution or improvement with dose reductions or stopping the drug.

Other adverse events in the brentuximab and control groups were neutropenia (35% vs. 12%), upper respiratory tract infections (26% vs. 23%), and fatigue (24% vs. 18%). Two patients died within 40 days of dosing with brentuximab, one from treatment-related acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pneumonitis and one following an episode of treatment-related acute pancreatitis that had resolved at the time of death, he reported.

Based on the results, study sponsor Seattle Genetics is expected to seek approval for brentuximab in this consolidation setting in the first half of 2015, according to a statement from the company. The ongoing phase III ECHELON-1 and ECHELON 2 trials in HL and mature T-cell lymphomas are looking at the use of brentuximab in frontline disease.

pwendling@frontlinemedcom.com

SAN FRANCISCO– PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, which have shown remarkable efficacy against advanced malignant melanoma, appear to hold similar promise in the treatment of relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma, results from two early studies suggest.

In a phase I study, the PD-1 blocking antibody nivolumab produced an 87% response rate in 23 heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). In a separate phase Ib study, pembrolizumab, which blocks the PD-1 and PD-2 ligands, produced a 66% overall response rate, 21% complete remission rate, and 86% clinical benefit rate among 29 patients with HL for whom therapy with brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) had failed.

The studies were presented at a media briefing prior to the presentation of data in oral sessions at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Classical Hodgkin lymphoma appears to be a tumor with genetically determined vulnerability to PD-1 blockade. We hope that PD-1 blockade in the future can become an important part of the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma,” said Dr. Phillipe Armand from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, an investigator for the nivolumab study.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Evidence from preclinical studies suggests that the Reed-Sternberg malignant cells characteristic of HL may use the PD-1 (programmed death 1) pathway to evade detection by immune cells, as suggested by pathologic studies showing the cells surrounded by an extensive but ineffective infiltrate of inflammatory cells.

“We’ve wondered for a long time how Hodgkin lymphoma could attract such a brisk immune response and yet have this immune response fail to kill the tumor,” he said.

Genetic Achilles heel

Genetic analyses had shown that HL frequently has a mutation that results in amplification of a region on chromosome 9 (9p24.1) which leads to increased expression of PD-1 ligands 1 and 2, and leads to a downregulation or weakening of the immune response. The mutation appears to work through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator transcription (STAT) signalling. These findings suggested to researchers that classical HL has a genetically driven and, ideally, targetable dependence on the PD-1 pathway for survival, Dr. Armand explained.

To test this idea, he and colleagues studied 23 patients with relapsed or refractory HL that had been heavily pre-treated who were part of an independent expansion cohort of a study of nivolumab in hematologic malignancies. Of these patients, 78% were enrolled after a relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation, and 22% after treatment with brentuximab vedotin had failed.

The patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until they had either a complete response, tumor progression, or excessive side effects. In all, 20 of the 23 patients (87%) had an objective response to the single-agent therapy, including 4 (17%) complete responses and 16 (70%) partial responses. The remaining three patients (13%) had stable disease.

The longest time on study at the data cutoff point was 72 weeks. Among all responders, 60% had a response by 8 weeks of therapy, 48% are ongoing, and 43% of patients are still on treatment.

Drug-related adverse events were reported in 18 patients, most commonly rash and decreased platelet count. Five patients had grade 3 events. There were no drug-related grade 4 events or deaths.

In an editorial accompanying the study, which was also published online in The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Mario Sznoll and Dr. Dan L. Longo from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut write that “with recent data showing impressive clinical activity of PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonists in subgroups of patients with a variety of different cancers, the critical and foundational role of immune interventions in cancer treatment is no longer deniable,” (NEJM, Dec. 6, 2014 [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087]).

Pembrolizumab trial

Dr. Craig H. Moskowitz from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City discussed results of the second study, dubbed KEYNOTE-013 (A Phase Ib Multi-Cohort Trial of MK-3475 in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies).

In this study, patients with HL who were not transplant eligible or for whom transplant had failed and who either had a relapse or were refractory to therapy with brentuximab vedotin received 19 mg/kg IV infusion of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks until complete response, partial response/stable disease, or disease progression.

Of the 31 patients enrolled, 29 were available for the analysis. As of the data cutoff in November 2014, 6 patients (21%) had achieved a complete remission, and 13 (45%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 66%. The median time to response was 12 weeks, and as of the data cutoff 17 of 19 patients had ongoing responses. The median response duration has not yet been reached. An additional 6 patients (21%) had stable disease, leading to an overall clinical benefit rate (responses plus stable disease) of 86%.

The patients generally tolerated the drug well. There were 4 treatment-related adverse events in 3 patients, including axillary pain, hypoxia, joint swelling, and pneumonitis. There were no grade 4 treatment-related events or deaths.

Of the tumor samples evaluable, all expressed PD-L1, supporting the rationale for PD-1 blockade in this population, Dr. Moskowitz said.

The results of both his and Dr. Armand’s study support the continued development of PD-1 inhibitors in various subsets of patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, he said.

SAN FRANCISCO– PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, which have shown remarkable efficacy against advanced malignant melanoma, appear to hold similar promise in the treatment of relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma, results from two early studies suggest.

In a phase I study, the PD-1 blocking antibody nivolumab produced an 87% response rate in 23 heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). In a separate phase Ib study, pembrolizumab, which blocks the PD-1 and PD-2 ligands, produced a 66% overall response rate, 21% complete remission rate, and 86% clinical benefit rate among 29 patients with HL for whom therapy with brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) had failed.

The studies were presented at a media briefing prior to the presentation of data in oral sessions at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Classical Hodgkin lymphoma appears to be a tumor with genetically determined vulnerability to PD-1 blockade. We hope that PD-1 blockade in the future can become an important part of the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma,” said Dr. Phillipe Armand from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, an investigator for the nivolumab study.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Evidence from preclinical studies suggests that the Reed-Sternberg malignant cells characteristic of HL may use the PD-1 (programmed death 1) pathway to evade detection by immune cells, as suggested by pathologic studies showing the cells surrounded by an extensive but ineffective infiltrate of inflammatory cells.

“We’ve wondered for a long time how Hodgkin lymphoma could attract such a brisk immune response and yet have this immune response fail to kill the tumor,” he said.

Genetic Achilles heel

Genetic analyses had shown that HL frequently has a mutation that results in amplification of a region on chromosome 9 (9p24.1) which leads to increased expression of PD-1 ligands 1 and 2, and leads to a downregulation or weakening of the immune response. The mutation appears to work through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator transcription (STAT) signalling. These findings suggested to researchers that classical HL has a genetically driven and, ideally, targetable dependence on the PD-1 pathway for survival, Dr. Armand explained.

To test this idea, he and colleagues studied 23 patients with relapsed or refractory HL that had been heavily pre-treated who were part of an independent expansion cohort of a study of nivolumab in hematologic malignancies. Of these patients, 78% were enrolled after a relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation, and 22% after treatment with brentuximab vedotin had failed.

The patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until they had either a complete response, tumor progression, or excessive side effects. In all, 20 of the 23 patients (87%) had an objective response to the single-agent therapy, including 4 (17%) complete responses and 16 (70%) partial responses. The remaining three patients (13%) had stable disease.

The longest time on study at the data cutoff point was 72 weeks. Among all responders, 60% had a response by 8 weeks of therapy, 48% are ongoing, and 43% of patients are still on treatment.

Drug-related adverse events were reported in 18 patients, most commonly rash and decreased platelet count. Five patients had grade 3 events. There were no drug-related grade 4 events or deaths.

In an editorial accompanying the study, which was also published online in The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Mario Sznoll and Dr. Dan L. Longo from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut write that “with recent data showing impressive clinical activity of PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonists in subgroups of patients with a variety of different cancers, the critical and foundational role of immune interventions in cancer treatment is no longer deniable,” (NEJM, Dec. 6, 2014 [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087]).

Pembrolizumab trial

Dr. Craig H. Moskowitz from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City discussed results of the second study, dubbed KEYNOTE-013 (A Phase Ib Multi-Cohort Trial of MK-3475 in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies).

In this study, patients with HL who were not transplant eligible or for whom transplant had failed and who either had a relapse or were refractory to therapy with brentuximab vedotin received 19 mg/kg IV infusion of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks until complete response, partial response/stable disease, or disease progression.

Of the 31 patients enrolled, 29 were available for the analysis. As of the data cutoff in November 2014, 6 patients (21%) had achieved a complete remission, and 13 (45%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 66%. The median time to response was 12 weeks, and as of the data cutoff 17 of 19 patients had ongoing responses. The median response duration has not yet been reached. An additional 6 patients (21%) had stable disease, leading to an overall clinical benefit rate (responses plus stable disease) of 86%.

The patients generally tolerated the drug well. There were 4 treatment-related adverse events in 3 patients, including axillary pain, hypoxia, joint swelling, and pneumonitis. There were no grade 4 treatment-related events or deaths.

Of the tumor samples evaluable, all expressed PD-L1, supporting the rationale for PD-1 blockade in this population, Dr. Moskowitz said.

The results of both his and Dr. Armand’s study support the continued development of PD-1 inhibitors in various subsets of patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, he said.

SAN FRANCISCO– PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, which have shown remarkable efficacy against advanced malignant melanoma, appear to hold similar promise in the treatment of relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma, results from two early studies suggest.

In a phase I study, the PD-1 blocking antibody nivolumab produced an 87% response rate in 23 heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL). In a separate phase Ib study, pembrolizumab, which blocks the PD-1 and PD-2 ligands, produced a 66% overall response rate, 21% complete remission rate, and 86% clinical benefit rate among 29 patients with HL for whom therapy with brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) had failed.

The studies were presented at a media briefing prior to the presentation of data in oral sessions at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

“Classical Hodgkin lymphoma appears to be a tumor with genetically determined vulnerability to PD-1 blockade. We hope that PD-1 blockade in the future can become an important part of the treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma,” said Dr. Phillipe Armand from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, an investigator for the nivolumab study.

Neil Osterweil/Frontline Medical News

Evidence from preclinical studies suggests that the Reed-Sternberg malignant cells characteristic of HL may use the PD-1 (programmed death 1) pathway to evade detection by immune cells, as suggested by pathologic studies showing the cells surrounded by an extensive but ineffective infiltrate of inflammatory cells.

“We’ve wondered for a long time how Hodgkin lymphoma could attract such a brisk immune response and yet have this immune response fail to kill the tumor,” he said.

Genetic Achilles heel

Genetic analyses had shown that HL frequently has a mutation that results in amplification of a region on chromosome 9 (9p24.1) which leads to increased expression of PD-1 ligands 1 and 2, and leads to a downregulation or weakening of the immune response. The mutation appears to work through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator transcription (STAT) signalling. These findings suggested to researchers that classical HL has a genetically driven and, ideally, targetable dependence on the PD-1 pathway for survival, Dr. Armand explained.

To test this idea, he and colleagues studied 23 patients with relapsed or refractory HL that had been heavily pre-treated who were part of an independent expansion cohort of a study of nivolumab in hematologic malignancies. Of these patients, 78% were enrolled after a relapse following autologous stem cell transplantation, and 22% after treatment with brentuximab vedotin had failed.

The patients received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until they had either a complete response, tumor progression, or excessive side effects. In all, 20 of the 23 patients (87%) had an objective response to the single-agent therapy, including 4 (17%) complete responses and 16 (70%) partial responses. The remaining three patients (13%) had stable disease.

The longest time on study at the data cutoff point was 72 weeks. Among all responders, 60% had a response by 8 weeks of therapy, 48% are ongoing, and 43% of patients are still on treatment.

Drug-related adverse events were reported in 18 patients, most commonly rash and decreased platelet count. Five patients had grade 3 events. There were no drug-related grade 4 events or deaths.

In an editorial accompanying the study, which was also published online in The New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Mario Sznoll and Dr. Dan L. Longo from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut write that “with recent data showing impressive clinical activity of PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonists in subgroups of patients with a variety of different cancers, the critical and foundational role of immune interventions in cancer treatment is no longer deniable,” (NEJM, Dec. 6, 2014 [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087]).

Pembrolizumab trial

Dr. Craig H. Moskowitz from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City discussed results of the second study, dubbed KEYNOTE-013 (A Phase Ib Multi-Cohort Trial of MK-3475 in Subjects With Hematologic Malignancies).

In this study, patients with HL who were not transplant eligible or for whom transplant had failed and who either had a relapse or were refractory to therapy with brentuximab vedotin received 19 mg/kg IV infusion of pembrolizumab every 2 weeks until complete response, partial response/stable disease, or disease progression.

Of the 31 patients enrolled, 29 were available for the analysis. As of the data cutoff in November 2014, 6 patients (21%) had achieved a complete remission, and 13 (45%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 66%. The median time to response was 12 weeks, and as of the data cutoff 17 of 19 patients had ongoing responses. The median response duration has not yet been reached. An additional 6 patients (21%) had stable disease, leading to an overall clinical benefit rate (responses plus stable disease) of 86%.

The patients generally tolerated the drug well. There were 4 treatment-related adverse events in 3 patients, including axillary pain, hypoxia, joint swelling, and pneumonitis. There were no grade 4 treatment-related events or deaths.

Of the tumor samples evaluable, all expressed PD-L1, supporting the rationale for PD-1 blockade in this population, Dr. Moskowitz said.

The results of both his and Dr. Armand’s study support the continued development of PD-1 inhibitors in various subsets of patients with classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma, he said.