Commentary

COMMENTARY—EXPEDITION3: A Winding Path to Nowhere


 

This new phase III trial of solanezumab reveals that the drug is not effective for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease, despite the hint that it was possibly effective based on post hoc analyses of earlier studies with this drug.

The findings expose the hazards of such post hoc analyses, typically done when the desired results are not observed, in the hope of squeezing lemonade from lemons. Although the subanalysis of patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease in the earlier studies suggested a 34% slowing of cognitive decline, as assessed by ADAS-Cog, an incremental slowing of 11% was seen in the new study that was not even statistically significant. While some secondary end points reached statistical significance, the slowing was so modest as to make no practical difference clinically.

I cannot emphasize enough that such equivocal results as seen in EXPEDITION3 do absolutely nothing to either confirm or deny the amyloid hypothesis. By now, there have been so many of these studies with antiamyloid agents, with little or no hint of efficacy, that we have long passed the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over in the hope of getting a different result.

The combination of all these clinical trial failures with the result of imaging studies that have shown amyloid deposition some 20 years before the expected onset of symptoms clearly tells us that antiamyloid agents should only be considered as potential prophylactics. By the time symptoms appear, disease progression is largely independent of amyloid and may be primarily tau-driven, spreading from neuron to neuron even when amyloid is effectively targeted by therapeutics. Even the A4 and DIAN studies are likely initiating treatment too late to make anything more than a modest effect with little practical value clinically. I am not suggesting that we drop amyloid as a target, only that we stop making these incremental changes in clinical trial design in the hope of getting a different result.

Michael S. Wolfe, PhD
Mathias P. Mertes Professor of Medicinal Chemistry
University of Kansas, Lawrence

Recommended Reading

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease accelerates brain aging
MDedge Neurology
After full data release, experts say failed Alzheimer’s trial EXPEDITION 3 offers hopeful signals
MDedge Neurology
TauRx still rooting for its methylene blue AD drug, despite controversial study results
MDedge Neurology
Statins protect against Alzheimer’s in most patients
MDedge Neurology
Two-test sequence identifies sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob with 100% sensitivity, specificity
MDedge Neurology
Sigma-1 agonist presses forward after positive results in small Alzheimer’s trial
MDedge Neurology
Phase I results move Alzheimer’s candidate drug aducanumab into phase III trials
MDedge Neurology
Ladostigil advances to phase III after hints of slowing brain atrophy in MCI patients
MDedge Neurology
Statins May Reduce the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease
MDedge Neurology
Failed Alzheimer’s Trial May Offer Hopeful Signals
MDedge Neurology

Related Articles