From the Journals

Tele-neurology visits deemed as effective as office visits for Parkinson’s patients

View on the News

Telemedicine could transform care for Parkinson’s patients

Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) show more improvements in motor symptoms and less frequently receive inappropriate medications when treated by a specialist. However, reduced mobility due to PD, combined with the physical distance to the specialist’s office, poses substantial travel burdens and may limit access to care.

Telemedicine, utilizing video and audio conferencing technology to connect patients and clinicians, can mitigate this problem. However, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services currently only covers telemedicine encounters under specific criteria: The patient lives in a rural area seen in a covered entity by a consulting physician licensed in the state in which the patient resides. Even if the rural designation were removed, requiring travel to a center that offers telemedicine consultation may preclude many patients from using this approach.

The study by Dr. Beck and his colleagues provides a good first step in demonstrating how neurologists can use available technology to reduce patient burdens while still maintaining high-quality neurologic care. If more evidence mounts, and the regulatory environment improves, home-based telemedicine has the potential to revolutionize modern health care for PD and other chronic debilitating diseases.

David Shprecher, DO, is with Banner Sun Health Research Institute in Sun City, Ariz. Jennifer Majersik, MD, is with the University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Dr. Shprecher reported financial relationships with a variety of companies that market or are developing drugs for Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Majersik reported receiving significant research support from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. These comments are adapted from an accompanying editorial (Neurology. 2017 Aug 16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004366).


 

FROM NEUROLOGY

A new study finds tele-neurology visits are just as effective as in-person visits for patients with Parkinson’s disease, while also saving time and mileage.

Lead author Christopher A. Beck, PhD, of the University of Rochester (N.Y.), and his colleagues studied 195 patients for 1 year who were either provided with their usual medical care or their usual medical care supplemented by four virtual visits via video conferencing from a remote specialist. Investigators evaluated the feasibility of telemedicine visits, as measured by the proportion of patients who completed at least one virtual visit and the proportion of virtual visits completed on time. Efficacy was also evaluated, as measured by the change in the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire–39, a quality of life scale. Secondary outcomes included quality of care, caregiver burden, and time and travel savings.

Eligible participants had a clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, had a private, Internet-enabled device, and lived in a state where a site investigator was licensed to practice. Patients randomized to the telemedicine group received up to four virtual visits over 12 months from a neurologist. Physicians and patients determined the specific content and frequency of each visit, but the format generally included a medical history, a Parkinson’s disease–specific examination (including assessment of tremor and gait), physician recommendations, and time to address patients’ concerns (Neurology. 2017 Aug 16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357).

The study findings showed that the virtual house calls were as effective as were in-person visits, with quality of life no better or worse for patients receiving care at home than for those receiving care in the office. Of telemedicine patients, 98% completed at least one virtual visit, and 91% of all virtual visits scheduled were completed. Researchers also found that participants’ overall quality of care and the burden felt by caregivers was no different whether they had virtual or in-person visits. Each virtual house call saved patients a median of 88 minutes and 38 miles per visit.

Ninety-seven percent of patients and 86% of participating neurologists said they were satisfied with the virtual visits, with 55% of patients stating they preferred virtual visits over in-person visits.

The study – the first national randomized controlled trial of telemedicine to connect remote specialists to patients at home – shows that tele-neurology is a practical and effective model of care for Parkinson patients, said study coauthor E. Ray Dorsey, MD, of the University of Rochester.

“People were very interested in taking part in this study, and the results showed that these virtual house calls were feasible for people with Parkinson’s disease,” Dr. Dorsey said in a statement. “People’s care was as effective as with the in-office visits, and the virtual house calls provided the participants with convenience and comfort.”

Dr. Dorsey noted that 73% of the study participants had visited a Parkinson’s disease specialist in the past year and 83% said they were satisfied with their care, which may have impacted the quality of life finding.

“The fact that adding the virtual house calls to people’s care did not improve their quality of life could be because a large proportion were already seeing a specialist and were satisfied with that care,” he said. “Of course, it’s also possible that virtual house calls are not enough to improve quality of life.”

Limitations of the study included that study participants were primarily well-educated and more familiar with the Internet than was the general population, so results may not be relevant for all people with Parkinson’s disease. In addition, the study population, of whom 96% were white with a mean age of 66 years, did not include people with the disease who live in nursing homes, who account for nearly 25% of all Medicare beneficiaries with Parkinson’s disease.

The study was supported by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Dr. Dorsey serves on the medical advisory board of, and has stock options in, Grand Rounds. No other relevant disclosures relevant were reported by study authors.

On Twitter @legal_med

Recommended Reading

New Tool Can Distinguish Between Tremor Syndromes
MDedge Neurology
Promising phase II results for Rytary reformulation for Parkinson’s
MDedge Neurology
App allows monitoring of drug effects in Parkinson’s
MDedge Neurology
Pegboard test useful in upper-extremity motor assessments in Parkinson’s
MDedge Neurology
More treatments becoming available for tardive dyskinesia
MDedge Neurology
Light Therapy May Treat Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Parkinson’s Disease
MDedge Neurology
First Clinical Trial of a Genetic Therapy for Huntington’s Disease Nears Completion
MDedge Neurology
Spinal Cord Stimulation May Improve Gait in Patients With Advanced Parkinson’s Disease
MDedge Neurology
Free water in brain marks Parkinson’s progression
MDedge Neurology
How to Keep Pace With Genetic Advances in Movement Disorders
MDedge Neurology

Related Articles