From the Journals

Diagnosing Giant Cell Arteritis Using Ultrasound First Proves Accurate, Avoids Biopsy in Many Cases


 

FROM ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Qualifications and Limitations

While over half of patients ultimately diagnosed with GCA were diagnosed using ultrasound, that percentage was “a bit lower than expected,” said Mark Matza, MD, MBA, the co-clinical director of rheumatology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. By comparison, one systematic review calculated ultrasound’s pooled sensitivity at 88% and pooled specificity at 96% for the diagnosis of GCA.

“In this [current] study, 30% of patients who had negative ultrasound were then found to have positive biopsy, indicating that ultrasound missed a substantial portion of patients who were ultimately diagnosed with GCA,” he continued.

Ultrasound is “very operator dependent,” he added, and there has been “variability in test performance of ultrasound.”

The authors acknowledged that techniques for ultrasound of the temporal arteries have also evolved over the study period, and thus, findings may not have been consistent.

However, about one in four patients with GCA were diagnosed after having both negative ultrasound and TAB results.

“One of the things that this paper shows is that even the gold standard of temporal artery biopsy isn’t 100% either,” noted Minna Kohler, MD, who directs the rheumatology musculoskeletal ultrasound program at Massachusetts General Hospital. “That’s why clinically, there is an increasing emphasis on using multimodality imaging to assist in the diagnosis of GCA along with a physician’s clinical intuition,” she said.

Dr. Minna Kohler, director of the rheumatology and musculoskeletal ultrasound program at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School

Dr. Minna Kohler

While ultrasound can visualize axillary, subclavian, and carotid arteries, other imaging modalities such as CTA, MRA, and PET/CT are better to fully assess supra-aortic and aortic vessels, she continued. However, “this imaging is more expensive and takes more time to coordinate, schedule, whereas ultrasound of temporal and axillary arteries can easily be done within the clinic with an immediate answer.”

This study was supported by a grant from “Recherche CH-CHU Poitou-Charentes 2014.” Dr. Denis disclosed relationships with Leo Pharma, Janssen, Novartis, Takeda, and Sanofi. Dr. Matza reported honoraria from the Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists. Kohler had no relevant disclosures.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Antiphospholipid antibodies linked to future CV events
MDedge Neurology
Researchers seek to understand post-COVID autoimmune disease risk
MDedge Neurology
Are cellular therapies the future of autoimmune disease?
MDedge Neurology
Short steroid taper tested with tocilizumab for giant cell arteritis
MDedge Neurology
New Findings on Vitamin D, Omega-3 Supplements for Preventing Autoimmune Diseases
MDedge Neurology
Comorbidities and Disease Type Weigh Heavily in Pregnancy Outcomes of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases
MDedge Neurology
Mixing Paxlovid With Specific Immunosuppressants Risks Serious Adverse Reactions
MDedge Neurology
Autoimmune Disease Risk May Rise Following Cushing Disease Remission After Surgery
MDedge Neurology
Autoimmunity’s Female Bias and the Mysteries of Xist
MDedge Neurology
Multidisciplinary Team Develops New Guidelines for Sjögren-Related Neuropathy
MDedge Neurology