News

A third of older adults may have biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer’s

View on the News

Study supports criteria, but data are confusing

The study by Dr. Stephanie Vos and her colleagues supports the emerging understanding of preclinical staging of Alzheimer’s disease – a concept useful not only for identifying at-risk populations, but for stratifying patient groups in therapeutic trials, Dr. Ronald Petersen wrote in an accompanying editorial (Lancet Neurol. 2013 Sept. 4 [doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70217-5]).

However, he noted, the authors’ data on disease progression is "a bit more difficult to interpret than the frequencies of participants in each stage of preclinical AD."

For example, he noted, the researchers "chose to label the category for the next phase of progression in the AD spectrum as symptomatic AD rather than the more conventional mild cognitive impairment due to AD, amnestic MCI, or prodromal AD. The reason for this terminology is unclear and is likely to add to confusion in the published work."

Dr. Vos and her colleagues’ dichotomization of subjects as normal or abnormal at baseline made no allowance for a symptomatic predementia, he noted – a position that "is inconsistent with the published work from other groups in the specialty." This elimination of mild cognitive impairment from the preclinical staging equation complicates any comparison to prior work.

"The investigators [also] contend that the Clinical Dementia Rating scale is sufficient to verify symptomatic AD irrespective of cognitive test results. The CDR is a staging and not a diagnostic instrument; thus, why all normal participants in this study who progressed were classified as having a diagnosis of symptomatic AD is not clear."

"Notwithstanding these concerns, this study is an important contribution to the published work and supports the NIA-AA criteria for preclinical AD," Dr. Petersen concluded. "Importantly, despite the differences in methodology and types of participants, the findings from this study, which used CSF, and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging, which used neuroimaging, converge convincingly."

Dr. Ronald Petersen is director of the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center in Rochester, Minn. He had no financial disclosures.


 

FROM THE LANCET NEUROLOGY

After adjustment for multiple covariates, subjects with baseline stage 1 disease were not significantly more likely to progress than was the normal group. However, those in baseline stages 2 and 3 were more likely to progress (hazard ratio 14.3 and 33.8, respectively). Those in the SNAP group were not at a significantly increased risk of progression, compared with the normal group.

After adjustment for covariates, the risk of death was significantly greater in those with baseline preclinical disease (HR 6.2). When the stages were individually assessed, the risk increased as the stages did: HR 3.7 for stage 1, 6.0 for stage 2, and 31.5 for stage 3. Those in the SNAP group were 5.2 times more likely to die by the end of follow-up than were those in the normal group.

Nine subjects with baseline preclinical disease who died received a postpartum autopsy diagnosis. Of these, one had low neuropathological changes consistent with Alzheimer’s and the rest had intermediate-high changes.

Four subjects in the SNAP group who died underwent autopsy. Of these, three had low-level neuropathological changes, including vascular comorbidities. All had a neuritic plaque score of 0. This finding suggests that the cognitive changes were linked to other disorders, the authors said.

Dr. Vos received support from the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, project LeARN and the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking, and Internationale Stichting Alzheimer Onderzoek. Several coauthors were investigators for industry-sponsored studies testing anti-dementia drugs or had ties with pharmaceutical companies developing Alzheimer’s diagnostic tests or therapies.

msullivan@frontlinemedcom.com

On Twitter @Alz_Gal

Pages

Recommended Reading

Aerobic Exercise Boosts Cognitive Function in Patients With MCI
MDedge Neurology
Subjective Cognitive Decline: The Earliest Sign of Alzheimer’s Disease?
MDedge Neurology
Do Statins Impair Cognition?
MDedge Neurology
Learning Genetic Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease May Not Cause Long-Term Distress
MDedge Neurology
New and Noteworthy Information—September 2013
MDedge Neurology
High-dose, high-potency statins reduced dementia risk
MDedge Neurology
Sleep Quality May Influence Cognition Among Middle-Aged Adults
MDedge Neurology
The Association Between Diet and Cognition May Vary With Gender
MDedge Neurology
Diagnosing Alzheimer’s: The eyes may have it
MDedge Neurology
Redesign needed for Alzheimer’s screening programs
MDedge Neurology