Conference Coverage

Andexanet reverses anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors

View on the News

Andexanet addresses factor Xa inhibitor concerns

Factor Xa inhibitors represent an important advance in anticoagulation therapy, but concern over the lack of antidotes has tempered enthusiasm for their use among patients and physicians. Warfarin is perceived as being safer as a result of the availability of effective reversal strategies.

Although additional studies will be needed to optimize the use of andexanet and to determine its true efficacy and safety, it represents a giant step forward in our ability to control anticoagulation therapy.

Dr. Jean M. Connors is with the hematology division at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, both in Boston. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1513258). Dr. Connors declared personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work.


 

FROM THE AHA SCIENTIFIC SESSIONS

References

Andexanet alfa has been found to reverse the anticoagulant effects of factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban, according to a study presented at the American Heart Association scientific sessions and published simultaneously in the Nov. 11 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

In a two-part randomized, placebo-controlled study involving 145 healthy individuals with a mean age of 58 years, patients treated first with apixaban and then given a bolus of andexanet had a 94% reduction in anti-factor Xa activity, compared with a 21% reduction with placebo. Thrombin generation was restored in 100% of patients within 2-5 minutes.

In the patients treated with rivaroxaban, treatment with andexanet reduced anti-factor Xa activity by 92%, compared with 18% with placebo. Thrombin generation was restored in 96% of participants in the andexanet group, compared with 7% in the placebo group.

Adverse events associated with andexanet were minor, including constipation, feeling hot, or a strange taste in the mouth, and the effects of the andexanet also were sustained over the course of a 2-hour infusion in addition to the bolus (N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510991).

“The rapid onset and offset of action of andexanet and the ability to administer it as a bolus or as a bolus plus an infusion may provide flexibility with regard to the restoration of hemostasis when urgent factor Xa inhibitor reversal is required,” Dr. Deborah M. Siegal of McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., and coauthors wrote.

The study was supported by Portola Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. Several authors are employees of Portola, one with stock options and related patent. Other authors declared grants and personal fees from the pharmaceutical industry, including the study supporters.

Recommended Reading

Off-label prescriptions frequently cause adverse events
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Modified Valsalva more than doubled conversion rate in supraventricular tachycardia
MDedge Emergency Medicine
CHEST: Catheter-directed thrombolysis shows pulmonary embolism efficacy
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest usually had intact brain function
MDedge Emergency Medicine
VIDEO: HFSA Roundtable, part 3: Acute heart failure decompensations pose uncertain consequences
MDedge Emergency Medicine
ACC rates hospitals’ performance on med prescribing at discharge
MDedge Emergency Medicine
VIDEO: Most women remain unconcerned about heart risk
MDedge Emergency Medicine
Continuous no better than interrupted chest compressions
MDedge Emergency Medicine
AHA: SPRINT’s results upend hypertension targets
MDedge Emergency Medicine
First EDition: News for and about the practice of emergency medicine
MDedge Emergency Medicine