Researchers have found a significant independent association between nocturnal hypoxemia and risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which they believe may help prevent the development of AF in this population, according to recent research published in the journal CHEST®.
“These findings are consistent with those of previous studies suggesting that these groups, who are typically at somewhat lower risk of [atrial fibrillation], might be especially vulnerable to the effects of [obstructive sleep apnea] and hypoxemia,” Tetyana Kendzerska, MD, PhD, of the University of Ottawa in Ottawa, and her colleagues wrote in their study.
They performed an analysis of 8,256 patients with data linked to a provincial health administrative database who had suspected OSA who underwent a sleep study at a large academic hospital between 1994 and 2010. The patients were median 47 years old; 62% of the cohort were men, 28% had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of greater than 30 events per hour, and 6% spent more than 30% of the time during sleep with less than 90% oxygen saturation.
Overall, 173 of 8,256 patients (2.1%) developed AF during the study period. In patients with suspected OSA and who were arrhythmia free, nocturnal hypoxemia significantly increased the risk of incident hospitalized AF (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-3.71) over median 10 years of follow-up (interquartile range, 7-13 years) after the researchers controlled for age, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of heart failure, smoking status, nocturnal hypoxemia, and pulmonary embolism, and this association remained significant after adjustment for body mass index and hypertension (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.15-2.74).
“These findings support a relationship between OSA, chronic nocturnal hypoxemia, and the development of [atrial fibrillation], and may be used to identify those patients with OSA who are at greatest risk of developing AF.”
Researchers cited the observational design, retrospective data collection, and examining hospitalized AF only as limitations in the study. However, they noted that clinical data was collected prospectively and the inability to adjust to positive airway pressure would push results to the null with regard to unstudied confounders.
The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
SOURCE: Kendzerska T et al. CHEST. 2018;doi:10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1075.