Law & Medicine

Workers’ compensation law


 

Question: Employee, a poorly controlled diabetic, accidentally stepped on a nail at work. Surrounding cellulitis and abscess formation set in, but because he was slow in getting to a doctor, the infection invaded the underlying bone, causing osteomyelitis. He ended up with a partial foot amputation. In a claim for workers’ compensation (WC) benefits, which of the following is best?

A. Employee has a claim under WC, a quasi no-fault system that requires an employer to compensate its employees only for accidents occurring in the workplace.

B. Employer may offer employee’s preexisting diabetic condition and his failure to promptly seek medical attention as substantial rebuttable evidence against compensability.

C. A similar no-fault system has been proposed as an alternative to medical tort litigation, but it has yet to be established in the developed world.

D. All are incorrect.

E. All are correct.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Medicine grapples with COI reporting
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Lawsuit against ABIM draws $200,000 in donation support
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Final ‘Vision’ report addresses MOC woes
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Physician PAC dollars support candidates against gun regulation
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Talk about déjà vu: Senators set to re-enact drug price hearing of 60 years ago
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Model shows nivolumab plus ipilimumab cost effective in mRCC
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
What does 'Medicare for all' mean?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Big pharma says it can’t drop drug list prices alone
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Malpractice suits are less frequent – but more costly
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA Expanded Access benefits heavily pretreated patients, especially children
MDedge Hematology and Oncology