Latest News

MIPS: Nearly 20% of small/solo practices took a pay cut in first year


 

Most clinicians participating in the Quality Payment Program’s Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) received some kind of positive payment adjustment, with small and solo practices fairing not so well.

TheaDesign/Thinkstock

Overall, 93% of the 1.1 million clinicians who participated in 2017 received a pay bump, according to data released by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Of those, about 755,000 (71%) received an exceptional performance payment adjustment of 1.88% and about 230,000 (22%) received a smaller adjustment of 0.2%. About 21,000 (2%) received no adjustment and nearly 52,000 (5%) saw their Medicare reimbursements cut by 4%.

The majority of those receiving pay cuts – about 43,000 (83%) – were in small or solo practices. About one in five participating clinicians in small or solo practices took a pay cut, according to CMS data.

“We weren’t surprised there at all,” Brian Outland, director of regulatory affairs at the American College of Physicians, said in an interview. “We felt that this was the way things were going to go, that small practices would be the ones in the negative.”

Less than half of participants in small or solo practices (44%, or about 101,000) received the exceptional performance bonus of 1.88%, while another approximately 68,000 (30%) received the 0.2% positive adjustment. About 18,000 (8%) received no adjustment.

The imbalance between large and small practices reveals a fundamental design flaw in the MIPS program, Mr. Outland noted.

“This program as presently designed does not certainly create an even playing field for large and small practices,” he said. “We think they need to simplify the MIPS program and make it easier for these smaller practices to be able to comply with the requirements and lessen the performance gap between large and small practices.”

Unless changes are made to help smaller practices perform better, “we feel this is going to continue in the future,” he added.

Outcomes for rural participants closely mirrored the national figures, with 65% (about 106,000) receiving the exceptional performance bonus of 1.88%, 28% (about 46,000) receiving 0.2% adjustment, 6% (about 9,300) receiving the 4% cut, and 1% (about 2,500) receiving no adjustment at all.

Clinicians in small and solo practices “still face challenges to full participation, which is why we will continue to provide direct technical assistance to these clinicians through the Small, Underserved, and Rural Support initiative to help alleviate barriers and create pathways for improvement and success,” CMS officials noted in the report.

SOURCE: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2017 QPP Experience Report.

Recommended Reading

‘Difficult’ discussions reduced anxiety, depression in life-limiting cancer patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Advance care planning codes not being used
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Match Day 2019: Residency spots increase, but improvements needed
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Death by a thousand clicks
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Breast cancer survivors offer realistic strategies for easing cost burden
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Will patient rewards for lower-cost choices impact physicians?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
MedPAC puts Part B reference pricing, binding arbitration on the table
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
FDA chief calls for stricter scrutiny of electronic health records
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Female radiation oncologists taking in smaller Medicare payments
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ABIM contests class-action lawsuit, asks judge to dismiss
MDedge Hematology and Oncology