Conference Coverage

Kidney function in African American AML patients not linked to reduced survival compared with whites


 

REPORTING FROM ASH 2019

– While African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia were more likely to have evidence of abnormal kidney function, the excess of this comorbidity didn’t affect overall survival, compared with whites, according to a study of more than 1,000 patients.

Andrew Bowser/MDedge News

Dr. Abby Statler

A total of 63% of African Americans with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presented with a renal function abnormality that could have excluded them from a clinical trial, compared with 56% in the overall cohort; however, analysis of outcomes data suggested that renal function abnormalities were not associated with decreased survival in African Americans versus whites, said Abby Statler, PhD, MPH, of the Cleveland Clinic.

The findings may have implications for the design of clinical trials that might exclude patients on the basis of comorbidities that don’t actually affect survival, according to Dr. Statler.

“If we’re able to liberalize renal function eligibility criteria ... this may reduce racial disparities in clinical trial enrollment, which might be a major step in improving the diversity of cancer patient populations,” Dr. Statler said in a press conference at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology.

Overly restrictive criteria could be a significant barrier to clinical trial enrollment among minority patient populations, according to Dr. Statler.

Eligibility criteria are generally biased toward “fit” patient populations, which means they may discriminate against less-fit groups, such as African Americans who, compared with whites, have higher rates of comorbidities and report poorer overall health, according to Dr. Statler.

Laura Michaelis, MD, who chaired the press conference, said these findings suggest current clinical trial designs may be “too restrictive.”

“Once it’s published and validated, [these] data should definitely make us think twice about when you limit a patient’s enrollment in a trial,” Dr. Michaelis said in an interview.

Restrictive eligibility criteria may not only limit access to minority populations, but also may slow clinical trial accrual and completion, and make it harder to generalize clinical trial findings to the overall population, said Dr. Michaelis, associate professor of medicine in the division of hematology and oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Risk model could help predict VTE in acute leukemia
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Guadecitabine offers limited advantage over other standards for high-risk AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
ADMIRAL results solidify gilteritinib as new standard for FLT3-mutated AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
How to recognize pediatric leukemia cutis
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Nonmyeloablative conditioning carries lowers infection risk in patients with AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Genetic analysis highlights value of germline variants in MDS, AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Adverse cytogenetics trump molecular risk in NPM1-mutated AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Hematopoietic cell transplant offers realistic cure in secondary AML
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Caspofungin bests fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in young AML patients
MDedge Hematology and Oncology
Will TP53-mutated AML respond to immunotherapy?
MDedge Hematology and Oncology