Conference Coverage

The Patient Knows Best: Integrating Patient-Reported Outcomes in RA Practice and Research


 

FROM RA SUMMIT 2024

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology are not just personal lists of physical complaints or so-called “organ recitals.” In fact, PROs can both guide treatment decisions in daily practice and serve as key endpoints for clinical trials.

That’s the informed opinion of Clifton O. Bingham III, MD, director of the Johns Arthritis Center in Baltimore, Maryland, who discussed clinical and research applications of PROs at the 2024 Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Summit presented by the Arthritis Foundation and the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York City.

Dr. Clifton O. Bingham III, director of the Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center in Baltimore, Maryland Johns Hopkins Medicine, Johns Hopkins Division of Rheumatology

Dr. Clifton O. Bingham III

“Integrating PROs into practice settings can enhance the clinician’s ability to understand their patients and monitor disease impact, and they are increasingly available for clinical care and are being qualified for outcome measures for clinical trials,” Dr. Bingham said.

“I posit to you that some of this ability to better characterize things like anxiety and depression levels of patients more precisely may help us to identify those patients who are less likely to respond to therapy and may require different interventions than disease-modifying therapies for their disease,” he told the audience.

PRO Examples

The term PRO encompasses a broad range of measures that may include health-related quality of life measures, symptoms and their affects, patient satisfaction, and the patient’s experience with care.

PROs are important for rheumatology care and research because “we now have the capacity to make what we used to think were the subjective experiences of disease more objective. We now have ways that we can put numbers and measurements to the experiences that patients have about their illness and use that information as a way to understand more about the patients who are in front of us and also how their disease changes over time,” Dr. Bingham said.

Patients are the best — or in some cases, the only — judges of many aspects of their health, and they are best suited to report on certain events and outcomes, he said.

PROs that are currently included in core outcome measures used to guide care and in clinical trials in pain scores as reported by visual analog scales; functioning, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and patient global assessment.

In international qualitative studies in which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were asked what was most important to them, the usual suspects of pain, function, and fatigue were routinely cited across the studies. But patients in studies from these groups (RAPP-PI, RAID, and OMERACT) also said that other factors important to their well-being included good sleep, enjoyment of life, independence, ability to participate in valued activities, and freedom from emotional distress, Dr. Bingham noted.

The Promise of PROMIS

The science of clinical measurement has advanced dramatically during his career, as Dr. Bingham said.

“There have been significant changes in the science behind how you develop and validate outcomes measures. The fields of clinimetrics and psychometrics have evolved substantially. These are now grounded in what we call ‘modern measurement’ approaches, which focus on item-response theory, constructing interval scales of measurement in things that are very precise in their ability to detect change over time,” he said.

One such measurement instrument is the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®), developed at the National Institutes of Health using advanced measurement science.

The system, administered through either computer or paper questionnaires, is designed to improve precision of health-related quality of life assessments in multiple domains, including most domains identified by patients with RA. It uses a T-score metric standardized to the US population.

“You can use this in a disease like rheumatoid arthritis, and you can find out how patients are doing in reference to the normative United States populations,” he said.

Dr. Bingham noted that his team has “very good data” to show that PROMIS system significantly outperforms existing instruments such as the HAQ.

Pages

Recommended Reading

AI’s Future and Current Role in Rheumatology
MDedge Rheumatology
No Excess Cancer Risk Seen with Non-TNF Inhibitor Biologics in RA
MDedge Rheumatology
Autoimmunity’s Female Bias and the Mysteries of Xist
MDedge Rheumatology
Tuberculosis Screening Gaps Persist in New DMARD Users
MDedge Rheumatology
Congress Directly Provides $10 Million for Arthritis Research for First Time
MDedge Rheumatology
High Infection Risk in Rheumatoid Arthritis–Associated Interstitial Lung Disease
MDedge Rheumatology
RA Flare Risk Rises Following DMARD Taper to Discontinuation With Conventional Synthetics or TNF Inhibitors
MDedge Rheumatology
Could Modifying Gut Microbiota Enhance Response to Methotrexate in RA?
MDedge Rheumatology
Shared Rheumatology-Primary Care Telehealth Model Brings Services to Rural Areas
MDedge Rheumatology
Mining EHRs with AI to Predict RA Outcomes: Coming to You Soon?
MDedge Rheumatology