News

Tracking System Proposed for Medical Devices


 

Most medical devices distributed in the United States should carry an identification label to help identify and resolve problems associated with them, according to a statement issued the Food and Drug Administration on July 3.

The unique device identifier (UDI), an exclusive numeric or alphanumeric code, "has the potential to improve the quality of information in medical device adverse event reports, which will help the FDA identify product problems more quickly, better target recalls and improve patient safety," according to the statement.

FDA

Example of what a universal device identifier (UDI) would look like on a medical device label. The label contains information about the product name, its expiration date, reference and lot numbers, manufacturer information, bar code, details about the item, and an illustration of the item.

In the proposed rule, the label will include an illustration of the device, the product name, its expiration date, reference and lot numbers, manufacturer information, as well as a bar code.

The UDI system is required by legislation passed by Congress in 2007 directing the agency to develop regulations establishing such a system, and the agency worked closely with industry, clinical groups, as well as patient and consumer groups, and has conducted four pilot studies in developing the proposed rule, according to the statement.

Implementation will be phased in, with the highest-risk medical devices labeled first. Low-risk devices will be exempt from some or all of the requirements and over-the-counter devices will be exempt, since they usually have a universal product code.

In addition to improving the accuracy of device-related adverse event reporting, the system is expected to expedite the resolution of device-related problems. The system also will address counterfeit products and medical emergency preparation.

The FDA is accepting comments on the proposal for 120 days.

Recommended Reading

Justices Uphold ACA, Strike Medicaid Expansion
MDedge Internal Medicine
Public Reacts to Supreme Court ACA Ruling
MDedge Internal Medicine
Head for the Hill: ACA Pushes More Doctors onto the Ballot
MDedge Internal Medicine
Can More Be Done With Less?
MDedge Internal Medicine
State Medicaid Programs Increasingly Seek ED Limits
MDedge Internal Medicine
U.S. Panel: Screen All Adults for Obesity
MDedge Internal Medicine
What's Next for the ACA?: The Policy & Practice Podcast
MDedge Internal Medicine
GSK Pays $3 Billion to Settle Drug Promotion Charges
MDedge Internal Medicine
Post-MI Rehospitalization Rate Has Not Declined Since 1987
MDedge Internal Medicine
Supreme Court Ruling Just the Beginning for Health Reform
MDedge Internal Medicine