Using visible light spectrography in the diagnosis of patients with suspected chronic gastrointestinal ischemia can lead to more accurate diagnoses, more-effective treatment regimens, and, ultimately, longer-lasting positive results, according to a new study published in the January issue of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.012).
“Medical history and physical examination were poor predictors for the presence of CGI [chronic gastrointestinal ischemia] [but] addition of radiologic evaluation [and] functional testing by means of tonometry substantially improved the accuracy of diagnosis,” said study leader Dr. Aria Sana of Utrecht University in the Netherlands.
The authors added that “VLS [Visible light spectrography] has recently been introduced as a new minimally invasive technique to detect mucosal hypoxia by means of measurement of mucosal capillary hemoglobin oxygen saturation during endoscopy in patients clinically suspected of CGI.”
In a prospective study, Dr. Sana and her associates gathered data on 212 patients referred to their medical center between November 2008 through January 2011 for suspected CGI. Subjects underwent visualization of gastrointestinal arteries and assessments of mucosal perfusion via VLS; those found to have occlusive CGI were followed-up after a median 13 months’ time to assess their response to treatment.
Of the 212 subjects initially screened, 107 (50%) were found to have occlusive CGI. Of that population, 96 (90%) were offered treatment, of which 89 (93%) were available to provide follow-up data after the median time of 13 months.
Investigators found that 62 subjects (70% of the 89 who reported after the follow-up period) had sustained responses to treatment that they were prescribed as a result of VLS and visualization-based diagnoses. Furthermore, patients who displayed weight loss, abdominal bruit, and low corpus mucosal saturation were found most likely to respond to treatment, particularly the latter – corpus saturation level of less than 56% was “one of the strongest predictors of a positive treatment response” investigators found.
“The presence of [at least] two predictors or the absence of any predictor was of discriminative value with [greater than] 85% vs. [less than] 50% response rate, respectively, suggesting patients with a predicted response rate of < 50% should primarily be considered for conservative management,” Dr. Sana and her coinvestigators noted.
The authors disclosed no conflicts of any kind.