Expert Commentary

Does planned early delivery make sense in women with preterm preeclampsia?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

A limitation of this study is that all women with preeclampsia were considered the same—that is, no distinction was made between severe and nonsevere preeclampsia, and a significant proportion of women had severe hypertension at enrollment, which would make them ineligible for expectant management anyway.

The maternal composite outcome was driven mostly by severe hypertension and progression to severe preeclampsia (likely driven by severe hypertension). All other maternal outcomes were very rare or did not happen; however, the incidence of delivery indications for various preeclampsia-related complications was higher in the expectant management group.

The takeaway

In the absence of biomarkers for risk stratification and treatment of preeclampsia, delivering women who have a diagnosis of preeclampsia at or beyond 34 weeks’ gestation may be a viable option for preventing maternal complications.

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE

In the United States, preeclampsia is categorized as severe or nonsevere, and gestational age at delivery depends on the type of preeclampsia. Clinicians should discuss expectant management after 34 weeks with patients who have preeclampsia without severe features, noting that this may decrease the chances for adverse maternal outcomes (mostly severe hypertension) at the cost of neonatal intensive care unit admission, which may depend on local practices. Attention also should be paid to particular patient populations (such as obese and African American women) who are at higher risk for developing adverse maternal outcomes. This may be particularly relevant in a smaller hospital setting in which patient follow-up may not be universal or access to a maternal-fetal medicine specialist may not be available to discuss management plans.

My personal take: I work in a large tertiary medical center. I worry about added prematurity, especially among women with superimposed preeclampsia where the diagnosis may be unclear. In my practice, we monitor patients with preeclampsia very closely, and with any signs of severe features we deliver them after 34 weeks. We follow ACOG guidelines for managing preeclampsia based on severity of disease and gestational age. I am not planning to immediately change my practice based on this study by Chappell and colleagues, and I will wait for results of long-term effects on neonatal outcomes, studies using biomarkers for risk assessment of women at risk for adverse outcomes, and opinions from ACOG and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine about this management plan.

SAROSH RANA, MD, MPH

Pages

Recommended Reading

Counseling on cannabis use in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Cannabis and prenatal care
MDedge ObGyn
Ask about vaping and e-cigarette use
MDedge ObGyn
Multidisciplinary care could address fertility preservation in transgender youth
MDedge ObGyn
Umbilical cord management matters less for mothers than for infants
MDedge ObGyn
Considerations on the mode of delivery for pregnant women with hepatitis C infection 
MDedge ObGyn
Data build on cardiovascular disease risk after GDM, HDP
MDedge ObGyn
Women with obesity need not boost calories during pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
Metformin after GDM: Lessons from landmark diabetes prevention trial
MDedge ObGyn
ART treatment at birth found to benefit neonates with HIV
MDedge ObGyn