Conference Coverage

Pelvic organ prolapse surgery isn’t as ‘simple’ as you think


 

EXPERT ANALYSIS FROM PAGS 2019

Worldwide differences in surgical technique choice

Dr. Walters talked to colleagues from several nations and learned about these variations in surgical techniques.

Chinese surgeons use a variety of techniques with transvaginal mesh (TVM). Their use is more common in more populated cities because of the effect of medical education; native tissue procedures are more common in less-populated regions that are considered “backward.”

TVM with hysteropexy (“apical sling”) also is common in Latin America, while Middle Eastern surgeons have little training in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

In Europe, France embraces mesh surgery and laparoscopy, while the United Kingdom has “completely abandoned” mesh surgery, and the Netherlands rarely uses it in favor of vaginal procedures.

In the United States, he said, TVM is “discouraged” while a variety of other procedures are used.

What procedures should surgeons embrace? There are many topics of debate, Dr. Walters said, including type of transvaginal repair (native tissue or mesh-augmented or sacrocolpopexy?), repair of “defects” in the vagina (even if they’re nonsymptomatic?) and the removal of the uterus (yes or no?).

Dr. Walters pointed to several explanations for this variation, including lack of high-quality research, confirmation bias, economic conflicts – surgeons are in the business of surgery, after all – and lack of insight into what women prefer.

Consider patient choice

In a survey, Dr. Walters polled women in their 50s with this question: “How much do you value your uterus?” Three women, he said, had widely varied opinions on a scale of 1-10, with one at 10 and another at 0.

“A doctor doesn’t know this and doesn’t have a way to ask, and the doctor has [his/her] own opinion about the value of the uterus,” he said. “Shouldn’t we know what patients think?”

How to measure success

He offered these tips about measuring success:

  • Focus on symptomatic cure more than clinical cure.
  • Remember that perfect anatomic support isn’t linked to health-related quality of life, and some loss of anatomic support is normal.
  • Understand that commonly used definitions of anatomic success often aren’t clinically relevant.

Dr. Walters’ disclosures: royalties (Elsevier, UpToDate), website/lecturer (International Academy of Pelvic Surgery), and website editor (Foundation for Female Health Awareness).

This meeting was jointly provided by Global Academy for Medical Education and the University of Cincinnati. Global Academy and this news organization are owned by the same company.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Hysterectomy in patients with history of prior cesarean delivery: A reverse dissection technique for vesicouterine adhesions
MDedge ObGyn
2019 Update on minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
MDedge ObGyn
Does BSO status affect health outcomes for women taking estrogen for menopause?
MDedge ObGyn
Women undergoing hysterectomy, myomectomy have similar short-term outcomes
MDedge ObGyn
Surgical staging improves cervical cancer outcomes
MDedge ObGyn
Opioid reduction works after minimally invasive gynecologic surgery
MDedge ObGyn
Depression linked to persistent opioid use after hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
Ultrasound distinguishes early, late-stage endometriosis
MDedge ObGyn
Good pregnancy outcomes after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation for fibroids
MDedge ObGyn
Bilateral mastectomy reduces second breast cancer risk, but not deaths
MDedge ObGyn