Conference Coverage

Barriers to clinical trial participation revealed by gynecologic cancer patients


 

FROM SGO 2020

A survey of gynecologic cancer survivors has revealed why some of these patients don’t participate in clinical trials.

Half of survey respondents with no history of trial participation said their medical team never mentioned the possibility of a trial. About 27% of respondents who never enrolled in a trial said they were interested in trial participation but didn’t qualify, the trial they wanted wasn’t available, their insurance didn’t cover participation, or the trial site was too far away.

Annie Ellis and Mary (Dicey) Jackson Scroggins, who are both ovarian cancer survivors and patient advocates, reported these findings in an abstract that had been slated for presentation at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. The meeting was canceled because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Annie Ellis, an ovarian cancer survivor and a research advocate on the scientific advisory committee of the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance in Washington, DC

Annie Ellis

“We thought it was important to hear and learn directly from gynecologic cancer survivors,” Ms. Ellis said in an interview. “So we decided to conduct a survey that would expand knowledge about clinical trial participation from a gynecologic cancer patient–specific perspective.”

Ms. Ellis and Ms. Scroggins used survivor networks and social media to distribute a 26-question survey on trial participation. The survey was completed by 189 survivors of gynecologic cancers, 49.19% of whom experienced recurrent disease. The most common diagnoses were ovarian cancer (69.84%) and endometrial or uterine cancer (23.28%).

Perspectives of nonparticipants

Most respondents (65.61%) had never participated in a clinical trial. The most common reason was that the patient’s doctor or medical team never discussed trial participation (50.40%).

There were patients who were interested in trial participation but couldn’t enroll because they didn’t qualify (14.40%), the location was too far away (7.20%), the trial they wanted wasn’t available (4.00%), or their insurance didn’t cover trial participation (1.60%).

Patients who were not interested in trial participation said they didn’t want to receive a placebo (11.20%), they weren’t interested in experimental therapies (3.20%), or they didn’t want to be randomized (2.40%). One patient (1.60%) said she does not trust the medical system.

“Given the frequent conversations about distrust in the medical system, we were surprised that only 1 of the 189 respondents indicated distrust in the medical system as a reason for not participating in a clinical trial,” Ms. Ellis said.

Perspectives of trial participants

Mary (Dicey) Jackson Scroggins, an ovarian cancer survivor and the director of global outreach and engagement at the International Gynecologic Cancer Society in Louisville, KY.

Mary (Dicey) Jackson Scroggins

Roughly a third of respondents (34.39%) had participated in a clinical trial. Most (86.15%) said they learned about the trial from their doctor. Other sources included the patient’s own research (13.85%), a trial matching service (3.08%), a family member or friend (3.08%), and a support group (1.54%).

The most common reasons patients participated in trials were: “my doctor recommended it,” “to help women in the future,” “to expand my treatment options,” and “to have a chance to benefit personally.”

Additional responses indicated that patients viewed their trial participation in a positive light.

“We were surprised to find that 100% of the respondents who had participated in a clinical trial indicated either that they would participate again (84.62%) or that they were not sure about future participation (15.38%),” Ms. Ellis said. “No respondent indicated that she would not consider another trial. From open comments in the survey, it was clear that even if they did not obtain the result they hoped for or if the experience wasn’t optimal, they maintained the option of participating again.”

Pages

Recommended Reading

Prospective algorithm favors vaginal hysterectomy
MDedge ObGyn
HPV vaccine-chemo combo prolongs cervical cancer survival
MDedge ObGyn
How is oncology adapting to COVID-19?
MDedge ObGyn
Cancer care and COVID-19 in Seattle, the first U.S. epicenter
MDedge ObGyn
How long is it safe to delay gynecologic cancer surgery?
MDedge ObGyn
Perspective from the heartland: Cancer care and research during a public health crisis
MDedge ObGyn
Guidelines on delaying cancer surgery during COVID-19
MDedge ObGyn
Vaginal artesunate quells CIN 2/3 lesions, clears HPV
MDedge ObGyn
PARP inhibitors not cost effective for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer
MDedge ObGyn
Blood test might detect multiple cancer types, study suggests
MDedge ObGyn