Conference Coverage

Pregnancy after breast cancer is rockier but doesn’t increase recurrence risk


 

FROM SABCS 2020

Close monitoring, early discussions are key

“Results of this meta-analysis provide reassuring, updated evidence on the feasibility and safety of conceiving in young women with prior breast cancer diagnosis. They provide crucial information for improving the oncofertility counseling of young breast cancer patients, helping them and their treating physicians in making evidence-based decisions on future family planning,” Dr. Lambertini commented.

“The higher risk of delivery and fetal complications … calls for ensuring a closer monitoring of these pregnancies,” he added. “The lack of detrimental prognostic effect of pregnancy after breast cancer following appropriate treatment and follow-up strongly voices the need for a deeper consideration of patients’ pregnancy desire as a crucial component of their survivorship care plan and wish to return to a normal life.”

Dr. Halle Moore of the Cleveland Clinic

Dr. Halle Moore

“The findings provide further support regarding the safety of pregnancy following a breast cancer diagnosis,” agreed Halle Moore, MD, of Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute in Ohio, who was not involved in this study.

“I would add that we still have a lot to learn about optimal timing of pregnancy with respect to breast cancer treatment for women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy,” she said.

The study’s results serve as a reminder that providers should be routinely discussing future pregnancy wishes and fertility preservation options with breast cancer patients at the time of initial diagnosis, Dr. Moore said.

“The earlier we identify an interest in future fertility, the more we can do to improve the chances for a successful pregnancy outcome,” she elaborated. “It is important to assess interest in future pregnancy as soon as possible when a young woman is diagnosed with breast cancer, as fertility preservation options are most likely to be successful when applied prior to chemotherapy or hormonal treatment for breast cancer.”

“The findings also suggest that involvement of a high-risk obstetrics team should be considered for pregnant breast cancer survivors,” Dr. Moore noted.

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health and the Italian Association for Cancer Research. Dr. Lambertini and Dr. Moore disclosed no conflicts of interest. Eva Blondeaux, MD, of University of Genova – IRCCS Policlinico San Martino Hospital, who presented this research at the meeting, disclosed no conflicts as well.

SOURCE: Blondeaux e et al. SABCS 2020, Abstract GS3-09.

Pages

Recommended Reading

An oncologist’s view on screening mammography
MDedge ObGyn
Breast cancer screening complexities
MDedge ObGyn
Restarting breast cancer screening after disruption not so simple
MDedge ObGyn
How ObGyns can best work with radiologists to optimize screening for patients with dense breasts
MDedge ObGyn
Combined features of benign breast disease tied to breast cancer risk
MDedge ObGyn
It’s not time to abandon routine screening mammography in average-risk women in their 40s
MDedge ObGyn
Thermography plus software shows efficacy for breast cancer screening
MDedge ObGyn
New estimates for breast cancer risk with HRT
MDedge ObGyn
Pregnancy outcomes ‘favorable’ after BRCA breast cancer treatment
MDedge ObGyn
Breast surgery may be a gateway to addictive medication use
MDedge ObGyn