Commentary

Addressing women’s concerns about the J&J vaccine


 

A rare form of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has developed in premenopausal women who have received the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Janssen J&J Covid vaccines in box Johnson & Johnson

This week we learned that of the more than 6.8 million individuals in the United States who received the single-dose J&J vaccine, six women aged 18-48 years have been diagnosed with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and all had thrombocytopenia. In each case, symptoms were first noted 1-2 weeks after vaccination. The Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended a pause in the administration of this vaccine.

Women’s health clinicians are already hearing from concerned patients, who understandably have questions about what this news means for them.

If they have already received the J&J vaccine within the past 3 weeks, I advise them that, although risks for any vaccine-related problems are extremely low, they should be mindful of new-onset leg or abdominal pain, or an unusual or severe headache. Such patients should contact their physician as soon as possible, and if they cannot be seen quickly, it would be appropriate to visit a hospital ED. When seeking medical care, patients should specify details of their vaccination history. Depending on the individual issues present, women with suggestive symptoms should receive blood work, Doppler venous studies (if there is a suspicion of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis), and appropriate imaging (if there is concern for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or pulmonary embolism).

As physicians and scientists at the CDC and FDA dig into this issue, I assume they are asking questions to determine whether the affected women have any factors that might increase their baseline risk for VTE, such as:

  • A body mass index of at least 30 kg/m2
  • Use of combination estrogen-progestin contraceptives (pill, ring, or patch)
  • Known or suspected chronic inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or
  • Known familial or other thrombophilic conditions or chronic
  • Recent prolonged immobility, such as a long airplane or automobile trip, which might increase risk for VTE
Womans arm, vaccination needle cookie_cutter/Thinkstock

Experts say that the risk for a serious adverse event following receipt of the J&J vaccine is outweighed by the benefits of vaccination against COVID disease. However, that may not be enough to allay concerns among some premenopausal women.

Even if the “pause” in the administration of the vaccine is lifted, some women may be asking whether they should receive J&J’s viral vector vaccine or request one of the messenger RNA vaccines. I will be looking to the expert opinions of Anthony S. Fauci, MD, and advice from the CDC and FDA for guidance here. However, it may be reasonable to steer high-risk reproductive-age women away from the J&J vaccine in favor of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, if these options are available.

A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

‘Beyond a reasonable doubt’: COVID-19 brain health fallout is real, severe
MDedge ObGyn
COVID-19 leaves thousands of U.S. children without a parent
MDedge ObGyn
Cancer screening stopped by pandemic: Repercussions to come?
MDedge ObGyn
U.S. finally hits its stride with COVID-19 vaccination rollouts
MDedge ObGyn
FDA, CDC urge pause of J&J COVID vaccine
MDedge ObGyn
Next winter may be rough: Models predict ‘considerable surge’ of COVID
MDedge ObGyn
Data about COVID-19-related skin manifestations in children continue to emerge
MDedge ObGyn
How to counsel worried patients about the J&J vaccine news
MDedge ObGyn
How some COVID-19 vaccines could cause rare blood clots
MDedge ObGyn
CDC panel: Pause of J&J COVID-19 vaccine to remain for now
MDedge ObGyn