Clinical Review

2021 Update on pelvic floor disorders

Author and Disclosure Information

 

How can we counsel patients regarding changes in sexual activity and function after surgery for POP?

Antosh DD, Dieter AA, Balk EM, et al. Sexual function after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review comparing different approaches to pelvic floor repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;2:S0002-9378(21)00610-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.042.

A secondary analysis of a recent systematic review found overall moderate- to high-quality evidence that were no differences in total dyspareunia, de novo dyspareunia, and scores on a validated sexual function questionnaire (PISQ12) when comparing postoperative sexual function outcomes of native tissue repair to sacrocolpopexy, transvaginal mesh, or biologic graft. Rates of postoperative dyspareunia were higher for transvaginal mesh than for sacrocolpopexy.

Study details

The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group identified 43 original prospective, comparative studies of reconstructive prolapse surgery that reported sexual function outcomes when comparing 2 different types of POP procedures. Thirty-seven of those studies were randomized controlled trials. Specifically, they looked at data comparing outcomes for native tissue versus sacrocolpopexy, native tissue versus transvaginal mesh, native tissue versus biologic graft, and transvaginal mesh versus sacrocolpopexy.

Results

Overall, the prevalence of postoperative dyspareunia was lower than preoperatively after all surgery types. The only statistical difference in this review demonstrated higher postoperative prevalence of dyspareunia after transvaginal mesh than sacrocolpopexy, based on 2 studies. When comparing native tissue prolapse repair to transvaginal mesh, sacrocolpopexy, or biologic grafts, there were no significant differences in sexual activity, baseline, or postoperative total dyspareunia, de-novo dyspareunia, or sexual function changes as measured by the PISQ12 validated questionnaire. ●

WHAT THIS EVIDENCE MEANS FOR PRACTICE
This systematic review further contributes to the growing evidence that, regardless of surgical approach to POP, sexual function generally improves and dyspareunia rates generally decrease postoperatively, with overall low rates of de novo dyspareunia. This will help patients and providers select the best-fit surgical approach without concern for worsened sexual function. It also underscores the need for inclusion of standardized sexual function terminology use and sexual health outcomes in future prolapse surgery research.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Even in a virtual environment, the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons delivers without a “glitch”
MDedge ObGyn
Pessaries for POP and SUI: Your options and guidance on use
MDedge ObGyn
Two at-home apps for patients with pelvic floor disorders
MDedge ObGyn
Pessaries for POP and SUI: Their fitting, care, and effectiveness in various disorders
MDedge ObGyn
Caring for women with pelvic floor disorders during pregnancy and postpartum: Expert guidance
MDedge ObGyn
FDA and power morcellation, gel for vaginal odor, and an intrauterine electrosurgery system
MDedge ObGyn
Obstetric anal sphincter injury: Prevention and repair
MDedge ObGyn
HIFEM procedure helped to improve UI and female sexual function
MDedge ObGyn
Closing the racial gap in minimally invasive gyn hysterectomy and myomectomy
MDedge ObGyn
A multidisciplinary approach to gyn care: A single center’s experience
MDedge ObGyn