Commentary

Poor Quality of Cancer Content on Social Media


 

This transcript has been edited for clarity.

I’m delighted to talk about a very interesting topic in this commentary. This is an area that we generally don’t discuss, but it’s one that’s obviously very topical, which includes the question of social media.

The paper I’m referring to is entitled, “More Than a Song and Dance”: Exploration of Patient Perspectives and Educational Quality of Gynecologic Cancer Content on TikTok. The paper was published in Gynecologic Oncology in 2023.

The investigators, very interestingly, looked at the most common hashtags for the five most common gynecologic cancers on TikTok. They had a total of 466.7 million views. They looked at 430 of the 500 top posts that were eligible, looked at 11 central themes, did an objective analysis of educational content based on published strategy for looking at this.

What they found, unfortunately but not surprisingly, overall was that the educational quality and reliability were quite poor. They also noticed considerable differences in disparities based on racial background and really emphasized in their analysis not only how common it is for individuals to look at this content on TikTok but also concerns about what it is that the public, patients, and their families are actually seeing.

This, of course, specifically relates to gynecologic cancers, but almost certainly relates to other cancers as well. Clearly, this is a topic that needs to be discussed widely. It’s very complex and very controversial, but when you think about the information that might be provided to our patients and their families going to social media, it’s important that we understand what they’re seeing, what they’re hearing, what they’re viewing, and the impact this might have on their care and outcomes.

I encourage you to read this very interesting paper if you have an interest in this topic. Again, it was recently published in Gynecologic Oncology. I thank you for your attention.

Dr. Markman is professor, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California; president of Medicine & Science, City of Hope Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix. He disclosed ties with GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

SUDs rates highest in head, neck, and gastric cancer survivors
MDedge ObGyn
Radiation Oncologists Fight for Payment Reform Amid Cuts
MDedge ObGyn
Dana-Farber Moves to Retract, Correct Dozens of Cancer Papers Amid Allegations
MDedge ObGyn
Two-Step Strategy Improves Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Detection
MDedge ObGyn
HPV Vaccine Shown to Be Highly Effective in Girls Years Later
MDedge ObGyn
HPV Positive Test: How to Address Patients’ Anxieties
MDedge ObGyn
Long-Term Follow-Up Emphasizes HPV Vaccination Importance
MDedge ObGyn
New Trials in Gynecologic Cancers: Could Your Patient Benefit?
MDedge ObGyn
Unleashing Our Immune Response to Quash Cancer
MDedge ObGyn
Democratic Lawmakers Press Pfizer on Chemotherapy Drug Shortages
MDedge ObGyn