TOPLINE:
Accurately diagnosing recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) in older women is challenging and requires careful weighing of the risks and benefits of various treatments, according to a new clinical insight published in JAMA Internal Medicine.
METHODOLOGY:
- Women aged > 65 years have double the rUTI rates compared with younger women, but detecting the condition is more complicated due to age-related conditions, such as overactive bladder related to menopause.
- Overuse of antibiotics can increase their risk of contracting antibiotic-resistant organisms and can lead to pulmonary or hepatic toxic effects in women with reduced kidney function.
- Up to 20% of older women have bacteria in their urine, which may or may not reflect a rUTI.
- Diagnosing rUTIs is complicated if women have dementia or cognitive decline, which can hinder recollection of symptoms.
TAKEAWAYS:
- Clinicians should consider only testing older female patients for rUTIs when symptoms are present and consider all possibilities before making a diagnosis.
- Vaginal estrogen may be an effective treatment, although the authors of the clinical review note a lack of a uniform formulation to recommend. However, oral estrogen use is not supported by evidence, and clinicians should instead consider vaginal creams or rings.
- The drug methenamine may be as effective as antibiotics but may not be safe for women with comorbidities. Evidence supports daily use at 1 g.
- Cranberry supplements and behavioral changes may be helpful, but evidence is limited, including among women living in long-term care facilities.
IN PRACTICE:
“Shared decision-making is especially important when diagnosis of an rUTI episode in older women is unclear ... in these cases, clinicians should acknowledge limitations in the evidence and invite patients or their caregivers to discuss preferences about presumptive treatment, weighing the possibility of earlier symptom relief or decreased UTI complications against the risk of adverse drug effects or multidrug resistance.”
SOURCE:
The paper was led by Alison J. Huang, MD, MAS, an internal medicine specialist and researcher in the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.
LIMITATIONS:
The authors reported no limitations.
DISCLOSURES:
Dr. Huang received grants from the National Institutes of Health. Other authors reported receiving grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, the Kahn Foundation, and Nanovibronix.
Cranberry supplements and behavioral changes may be helpful, but evidence is limited, including among women living in long-term care facilities.
A version of this article first appeared on Medscape.com.