Commentary

Low HPV Vaccination in the United States Is a Public Health ‘Failure’


 

This transcript has been edited for clarity.

I would like to briefly discuss what I consider to be a very discouraging report and one that I believe we as an oncology society and, quite frankly, as a medical community need to deal with.

The manuscript I’m referring to is from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, titled, “Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Coverage in Children Ages 9-17 Years: United States, 2022.” This particular analysis looked at the coverage of both men and women — young boys and young girls, I would say — receiving at least one dose of the recommended human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Since 2006, girls have been recommended to receive HPV vaccination; for boys, it’s been since 2011. Certainly, the time period that we’re considering falls within the recommendations based on overwhelmingly positive data. Now, today, still, the recommendation is for more than one vaccine. Obviously, there may be evidence in the future that a single vaccination may be acceptable or appropriate. But today, it’s more than one.

In this particular analysis, they were looking at just a single vaccination. The vaccines have targeted young individuals, both male and female children aged 11-12 years, but it’s certainly acceptable to look starting at age 9.

What is the bottom line? At least one dose of the HPV vaccination was given to 38.6% of children aged 9-17 years in 2022. We are talking about a cancer-preventive vaccine, which on the basis of population-based data in the United States, but also in other countries, is incredibly effective in preventing HPV-associated cancers. This not only includes cervical cancer, but also a large percentage of head and neck cancers.

For this vaccine, which is incredibly safe and incredibly effective, in this country, only 38.6% have received even a single dose. It is noted that the individuals with private insurance had a higher rate, at 41.5%, than individuals with no insurance, at only 20.7%.

In my opinion, this is clearly a failure of our public health establishment at all levels. My own focus has been in gynecologic cancers. I’ve seen young women with advanced cervical cancer, and this is a disease we can prevent. Yet, this is where we are.

For those of you who are interested in cancer prevention or public health, I think this is a very sobering statistic. It’s my plea and my hope that we can, as a society, somehow do something about it.

I thank you for listening. I would encourage you to think about this question if you’re in this area.

Dr. Markman, professor, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, and president of Medicine & Science, City of Hope Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix, disclosed ties with GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Rubella Screening in Pregnancy No Longer Recommended in Italy
MDedge ObGyn
HPV Vaccine Shown to Be Highly Effective in Girls Years Later
MDedge ObGyn
RNA Vaccines: Risk for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Clarified
MDedge ObGyn
HPV Positive Test: How to Address Patients’ Anxieties
MDedge ObGyn
Long-Term Follow-Up Emphasizes HPV Vaccination Importance
MDedge ObGyn
Risk for Preterm Birth Stops Maternal RSV Vaccine Trial
MDedge ObGyn
Vaccine Against Urinary Tract Infections in Development
MDedge ObGyn
New mRNA Vaccines in Development for Cancer and Infections
MDedge ObGyn
Could British Columbia Eliminate Cervical Cancer by 2031?
MDedge ObGyn
Online Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections? Ethicist Says We Are Nowhere Close
MDedge ObGyn