Commentary

John Edwards’ case seemed right on target


 

Although I enjoy Dr. Barbieri’s thoughtful editorials, the one on John Edwards caused me some concern.

Are you saying it is appropriate for a hospital to obtain consent for treatment 80 minutes after the procedure? In my opinion, this borders on fraud and should not be considered a legal document.

Are you saying a hospital/medical staff should not “closely oversee” the care provided by members of the medical staff? In my opinion, this is one of the major functions of the hospital/medical staff.

Ray King, MD
Opp, Alabama

Dr. Barbieri responds:

Thanks to Drs. Bartulica and King for their detailed comments. To my knowledge, Edwards was the first medical liability attorney to take a case to trial without a defendant physician, and to identify as defendants nurses, hospital board members, and administrators. In 1985, this tactic was considered very aggressive. In my opinion, it would appear more constructive to balance the needs of the plaintiff against the potential adverse effects of expanding liability to every individual who interacts with a patient.

Recommended Reading

Why evidence-based guidelines on hormones aren’t all alike
MDedge ObGyn
Ectopic pregnancy: A 5-step plan for medical management
MDedge ObGyn
UTI in pregnancy: 6 questions to guide therapy
MDedge ObGyn
Easier reimbursement: How the new ICD-9 helps
MDedge ObGyn
Recommendations on hormone therapy in peri- and postmenopause
MDedge ObGyn
2 menorrhagia treatments: Which is better?
MDedge ObGyn
Fetal loss linked to excess thyroid hormone
MDedge ObGyn
Solid defense fails in Erb’s palsy lawsuit
MDedge ObGyn
New Web site on shoulder dystocia
MDedge ObGyn
Best prevention: Densitometry, drugs, determination
MDedge ObGyn