Expert Commentary

FDA alert: Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh carries serious risks


 

Infection, pain, urinary problems, and erosion of mesh through vaginal epithelium are some of the most frequent complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, according to an October 2008 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alert.

These complications have been documented in more than 1,000 reports from nine surgical mesh manufacturers over the past 3 years. Besides the complications described above, they include:

  • recurrent prolapse or incontinence (or both)
  • bowel, bladder, and blood-vessel perforation during insertion
  • vaginal scarring.

In many cases, additional surgery was required, as were intravenous therapy, blood transfusion, and drainage of hematoma or abscess.

Who is at risk?

Although the FDA has not determined whether specific patient characteristics increase the risk of complication, it notes that poor health overall and low estrogen levels may contribute. Other potential variables include the specific mesh material (as well as its size and shape), the surgical technique used, and whether concomitant procedures were undertaken.

The FDA advises physicians to…

  • obtain specialized training for each mesh-placement technique
  • watch for potential adverse events, especially erosion and infection
  • watch for complications associated with surgery itself, such as bowel perforation
  • tell the patient that surgical-mesh implantation is permanent, and warn her of potential complications, including the possible need for additional surgery
  • give each patient a written copy of patient labeling from the surgical mesh manufacturer.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, VISIT

www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/102008-surgicalmesh.html (health-care providers)

www.fda.gov/cdrh/consumer/surgicalmesh-popsui.html (consumers)

Also, return here in January 2009, when OBG Management features a roundtable on using mesh in prolapse repair, moderated by Mickey M. Karram, MD.

Recommended Reading

Hospitalists in Ideal Position to Improve Quality
MDedge ObGyn
Aetna's Physician Rating Gets NCQA OK
MDedge ObGyn
IMRT Fails to Aid Survival in Cervical Ca Patients
MDedge ObGyn
Avoid Empiric Steroid Treatment for Vulvar Skin Disorders
MDedge ObGyn
Linezolid-Resistant MRSA Outbreak Reported
MDedge ObGyn
Feds Push E-Prescribing With Medicare Bonuses
MDedge ObGyn
Med School Diversity Sways Health Care Concepts
MDedge ObGyn
High Physician Suicide Rates Suggest Barriers to Treatment
MDedge ObGyn
Preeclampsia Tied to Offspring's Stroke Risk
MDedge ObGyn
Immunodrugs Compared On Pregnancy Outcomes
MDedge ObGyn