Surgical Techniques

The posterior colpotomy: An alternative approach to tissue extraction

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Manual morcellation will be necessary for the second, larger myoma. We perform that morcellation sharply using a scalpel within the specimen retrieval bag, taking care not to puncture the bag (FIGURE 8). When the myoma pieces are small enough, we remove them, along with the bag, through the posterior colpotomy. We then close the colpotomy laparoscopically using two interrupted 0 Vicryl sutures, and we copiously irrigate the pelvis (FIGURE 9).

Figure 6: Remove the Access Port

Prior to tissue extraction, remove the Access Port from the vagina.

Figure 7: Exteriorize the bag
Exteriorize the specimen-retrieval bag vaginally for tissue extraction.
Figure 8: Contain the morcellation

Manually morcellate the specimen within the bag and remove it transvaginally.
Figure 9: Close the colpotomy
Close the colpotomy once both myomas and the specimen bag have been removed.

Benefits of this approach
The greatest benefit of this technique is the safe removal of specimens when performing fertility-sparing surgery. The 5-mm incisions are cosmetically inconspicuous. Moreover, the risk of port-site hernia is lower with 5-mm incisions, as opposed to extended incisions to remove specimens transabdominally.

The posterior colpotomy is associated with reduced pain and does not increase the rate of dyspareunia or infection; it also helps prevent pelvic adhesions.8–11

In 1993, we reported the results of ­second-look laparoscopy in 22 women who had undergone laparoscopic posterior colpotomy for tissue extraction. None had obliterative adhesions in the posterior cul-de-sac.11 This advantage is especially important in fertility-sparing surgery.

We have used this approach for specimen removal after several different procedures, including laparoscopic cystectomy and appendectomy.12,13 For laparoscopic cystectomy, once the cyst is drained, we enucleate it and place the cyst capsule into a specimen bag that has been inserted transvaginally through a posterior colpotomy.12 Laparoscopic appendectomy can be ­performed using a 12-mm stapler introduced via the colpotomy. We simply remove the specimen in its entirety through the posterior colpotomy.13

The bottom line: Gynecologic surgeons need to continue performing minimally invasive surgery for the benefit of patients. Moving forward and innovating to develop alternatives to intracorporeal power morcellation, when possible, should be our aim rather than falling back on surgeries through large abdominal incisions.

CASE: Resolved
At her 1-week postoperative visit, the patient’s 5-mm incisions are healing well and she has minimal pain.

Share your thoughts on this article! Send your Letter to the Editor to rbarbieri@frontlinemedcom.com. Please include your name and the city and state in which you practice.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Midurethral slings
MDedge ObGyn
Best practices for the surgical management of adnexal masses in pregnancy
MDedge ObGyn
How the AAGL is trying to improve outcomes for patients undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic surgery
MDedge ObGyn
The FDA’s review of the data on open power morcellation was “inadequate, irresponsible” and a “disservice to women”
MDedge ObGyn
Bariatric surgery an opportunity to screen for endometrial cancer
MDedge ObGyn
FDA warns against laparoscopic power morcellation
MDedge ObGyn
Careful screening catches sarcomas before morcellation
MDedge ObGyn
Battle over morcellation lost ‘in the media’
MDedge ObGyn
Expert panel endorses continued use of morcellation
MDedge ObGyn
Mastering the uterine manipulator: Basics and beyond
MDedge ObGyn

Related Articles