News

21-gene recurrence score assay underwent rapid uptake in U.S. breast cancer patients

View on the News

RS score did not alter chemotherapy use

Despite the appropriately tested population, the RS score did not result in a significant change in chemotherapy utilization in this older, intermediate-risk group, increasing from 8.2% to 10%, which was not statistically significant. This contrasts with data demonstrating a more significant change in practice patterns. The lack of change in chemotherapy utilization suggests either that physicians have a bias about treating older patients with chemotherapy that the test did not change, regardless of results, or that the test results were concordant with their pretest bias.

For the test to have clinical utility in the older population, patients would have to accurately understand their risk of recurrence and life expectancy and to have a realistic expectation of the toxic effects related to chemotherapy (which many older patients might tolerate well). Physicians have to be willing to recommend chemotherapy to appropriate older patients who have a high RS, patients for whom they ordinarily might not be as definitive in their treatment recommendation as they would be with a younger patient.

For the most part, older patients with relatively low-risk disease do not want chemotherapy and physicians do not want to prescribe it. Perhaps the threshold for recommending testing in older patients should be adjusted to test only those with higher-risk tumors for which there is more inclination toward treatment.

Dr. Lisa Flaum and Dr. William J. Gradishar are with Northwestern University, Chicago. These comments are based on their accompanying editorial (JAMA Oncol. 2015 March 5 [doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.32]).


 

References

A genetic assay designed to predict breast cancer metastasis and response to adjuvant chemotherapy has undergone rapid uptake, and clinicians are generally following guidelines for its use, researchers reported online in JAMA Oncology.

Overall use of the Oncotype DX 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay rose from 1.1% in 2005 to 10.1% in 2009 (P < .001), reported Dr. Michaela Dinan of Duke University, Durham, N.C., and her associates.

©ktsimage/Thinkstock.com

“We found that use of the assay was largely restricted to the populations for which it was initially approved in 2005, namely women with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, stage I or II breast cancer,” the investigators said (JAMA Oncol. 2015 Mar. 5 [doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.43]).The RS assay has been available commercially since 2004, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has covered it since 2006. Dr. Dinan and her associates studied records from a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data set with linked Medicare claims to understand trends in testing. The study included 70,802 patients with breast cancer, all of whom were at least 66 years old at diagnosis.

Almost 61% of patients who were tested with the RS assay met the National Comprehensive Cancer Network’s criteria for intermediate-risk disease – estrogen receptor–positive, lymph node–negative tumors measuring more than 1 cm, said the researchers. Most other tested patients had “borderline” indications for use of the assay, such as T1b or N1 disease. Significant predictors of testing included being less than 70 years old at diagnosis, having less than two comorbid conditions, and having tumors that were grade 2 or 3 or larger than 2 cm. Testing varied little geographically, and not at all by race, the investigators noted.

The RS assay is currently not required or universally recommended for all breast cancer patients who are considering adjuvant chemotherapy, so the researchers could not assess whether patients were being adequately tested, they said. They recommended analyzing other data besides that from the SEER-Medicare data set, including data on younger women, who might have distinct patterns of testing and chemotherapy use. Because some studies also indicated that the RS assay might be useful in patients with node-positive disease, the investigators also suggested examining its use in this setting and assessing how testing affects costs, chemotherapy use, and treatment outcomes.

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality funded the study. The authors reporting having no relevant conflicts of interest.

Recommended Reading

Why is traditional open myomectomy acceptable if power morcellation isn’t?
MDedge ObGyn
FDA approves palbociclib with letrozole for advanced postmenopausal breast cancer
MDedge ObGyn
Breast cancer patients show poor adherence to cardiovascular, diabetes medications
MDedge ObGyn
Lung cancer bypasses breast cancer as leading cause of cancer death for women in developed countries
MDedge ObGyn
Stage trumps biology for most small triple-negative breast cancers
MDedge ObGyn
Treatments for metastatic breast cancer expanding but decisions personalized
MDedge ObGyn
Cancer mortality lowest in western United States
MDedge ObGyn
More cancer patients surviving longer, but age-based disparities remain
MDedge ObGyn
Is supplemental ultrasonography a valuable addition to breast cancer screening for women with dense breasts?
MDedge ObGyn
Physician education gaps impact breast density laws
MDedge ObGyn