Feature

Urine Tests Could Be ‘Enormous Step’ in Diagnosing Cancer


 

Limitations and Promises

Each cancer type is different, and more research is needed to map out which substances in urine predict which cancers and to develop tests for mass adoption. “There are medical and technological hurdles to the large-scale implementation of urine analysis for complex diseases such as cancer,” said Dr. Wong.

One possibility: Scientists and clinicians could collaborate and use artificial intelligence techniques to combine urine test results with other data.

“It is likely that future diagnostics may combine urine with other biological samples such as feces and saliva, among others,” said Dr. Wong. “This is especially true when novel data science and machine learning techniques can integrate comprehensive data from patients that span genetic, proteomic, metabolic, microbiomic, and even behavioral data to evaluate a patient’s condition.”

One thing that excites Dr. Tewari about urine-based cancer testing: “We think it could be especially impactful for patients living in rural areas or other areas with less access to healthcare services,” he said.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Pages

Recommended Reading

A Banned Chemical That Is Still Causing Cancer
MDedge Pediatrics
Certain Pesticides Linked With Risk for Pancreatic Cancer
MDedge Pediatrics
Lead Has Not Gone Away — What Should Pediatric Clinicians Do?
MDedge Pediatrics
Repeat MCED Testing May ID Early-Stage and Unscreened Cancers
MDedge Pediatrics
Oncologists Voice Ethical Concerns Over AI in Cancer Care
MDedge Pediatrics
No Routine Cancer Screening Option? New MCED Tests May Help
MDedge Pediatrics
New Trial Deepens Debate Over Late-Preterm Steroids
MDedge Pediatrics
The Long, Controversial Search for a ‘Cancer Microbiome’
MDedge Pediatrics
Can a Risk Score Predict Kidney Injury After Cisplatin?
MDedge Pediatrics
New mRNA Vaccines in Development for Cancer and Infections
MDedge Pediatrics