Commentary

Low HPV Vaccination in the United States Is a Public Health ‘Failure’


 

This transcript has been edited for clarity.

I would like to briefly discuss what I consider to be a very discouraging report and one that I believe we as an oncology society and, quite frankly, as a medical community need to deal with.

The manuscript I’m referring to is from the United States Department of Health and Human Services, titled, “Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Coverage in Children Ages 9-17 Years: United States, 2022.” This particular analysis looked at the coverage of both men and women — young boys and young girls, I would say — receiving at least one dose of the recommended human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination.

Since 2006, girls have been recommended to receive HPV vaccination; for boys, it’s been since 2011. Certainly, the time period that we’re considering falls within the recommendations based on overwhelmingly positive data. Now, today, still, the recommendation is for more than one vaccine. Obviously, there may be evidence in the future that a single vaccination may be acceptable or appropriate. But today, it’s more than one.

In this particular analysis, they were looking at just a single vaccination. The vaccines have targeted young individuals, both male and female children aged 11-12 years, but it’s certainly acceptable to look starting at age 9.

What is the bottom line? At least one dose of the HPV vaccination was given to 38.6% of children aged 9-17 years in 2022. We are talking about a cancer-preventive vaccine, which on the basis of population-based data in the United States, but also in other countries, is incredibly effective in preventing HPV-associated cancers. This not only includes cervical cancer, but also a large percentage of head and neck cancers.

For this vaccine, which is incredibly safe and incredibly effective, in this country, only 38.6% have received even a single dose. It is noted that the individuals with private insurance had a higher rate, at 41.5%, than individuals with no insurance, at only 20.7%.

In my opinion, this is clearly a failure of our public health establishment at all levels. My own focus has been in gynecologic cancers. I’ve seen young women with advanced cervical cancer, and this is a disease we can prevent. Yet, this is where we are.

For those of you who are interested in cancer prevention or public health, I think this is a very sobering statistic. It’s my plea and my hope that we can, as a society, somehow do something about it.

I thank you for listening. I would encourage you to think about this question if you’re in this area.

Dr. Markman, professor, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, California, and president of Medicine & Science, City of Hope Atlanta, Chicago, and Phoenix, disclosed ties with GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca.

A version of this article appeared on Medscape.com.

Recommended Reading

Getting Reluctant Patients to ‘Yes’ on COVID Vaccination
MDedge Pediatrics
Measles Control So Far in 2024: ‘Not Off to a Great Start’
MDedge Pediatrics
Recently Immunized Febrile Infants Have Low Infection Risk
MDedge Pediatrics
Vaccine ‘Will Not Curb’ Dengue Epidemic, Says PAHO
MDedge Pediatrics
New mRNA Vaccines in Development for Cancer and Infections
MDedge Pediatrics
Chronotherapy: Why Timing Drugs to Our Body Clocks May Work
MDedge Pediatrics
Predicting and Understanding Vaccine Response Determinants
MDedge Pediatrics
New Mid-Year Vaccine Recommendations From ACIP
MDedge Pediatrics
Whooping Cough Likely on Pace for a 5-Year High
MDedge Pediatrics
Predicting RSV’s Role in the Upcoming Winter Respiratory Season
MDedge Pediatrics