Medicolegal Issues

Peaceful feeling, or up in smoke? Medical marijuana in medicolegal context

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Courts have found physicians negligent if their patients’ treatment-induced driving impairments injured others when the risk of driving-related injury was foreseeable.32 The Massachusetts case of Coombes v Florio33 lik­ened the physician’s duty to that of a liquor store that sells alcohol to a minor who sub­sequently crashes, or to a father who did not lock his firearms away from his violent adult son.

Three variables influence a court’s judgment about whether risk is “foresee­able”: “the relative knowledge of the risk as between lay persons and physicians, whether the patient has previously used the medication and/or experienced the adverse effect, and whether a warning would other­wise have been futile.”34 A physician who certified a patient to use marijuana without adequately explaining the risks of driv­ing might be vulnerable to a lawsuit if the patient’s driving accident occurred while the patient was under the influence of the drug. Recommending marijuana as a treat­ment also could lead to a malpractice action if a patient experienced and was harmed by the drug’s adverse effects.


Other drags
Another malpractice risk stems from mari­juana’s addiction potential. Although many people think Cannabis isn’t addictive, nearly 10% of all marijuana users develop depen­dence.10,17 Regular Cannabis users are more likely to use alcohol, tobacco, and “recre­ational” drugs,17,35 and using alcohol and marijuana together greatly heightens the risk of driving accidents.14,15 Although we know of no case that relates directly to mari­juana, physicians have faced lawsuits for injuries stemming from a patient’s addiction to prescription drugs,36 particularly when the patient’s behavior should have led the physician to suspect abuse or overuse.37

When certifying marijuana use, physi­cians have the same obligations that apply to more conventional medical treatment:
• establishing a proper physician–patient relationship
• taking an appropriate history
• conducting a proper examination
• reviewing records
• developing a comprehensive treatment plan
• weighing risks and alternatives
• providing follow-up care.

Neglecting these steps could lead to medical board sanctions and suspension or revocation of a medical license.13


The blunt reality
We advise against recommending mari­juana for your patients. But if you have exhausted the alternatives, see marijuana as the last resort, and believe that taking the risk is worth the potential benefit, you can take some steps to reduce your legal risk (Table 2,1,32,37,38 and Table 313).


Bottom LinE
Medical marijuana is a controversial topic that demands more rigorous research and regulatory consideration. In the present climate, cautious physicians will avoid recommending marijuana to their patients. If you think that a patient has a medical indication, with no treatment option better than medical marijuana, be sure to understand the medical and legal ramifications before you authorize its use.

Disclosures
The authors report no financial relationship with any company whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufacturers of competing products.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Medicare hospital costs down over last 6 months of life
MDedge Psychiatry
Bill to overhaul mental health system introduced in Senate
MDedge Psychiatry
CMS releases ICD-10-CM valid codes and code titles
MDedge Psychiatry
Most docs still not ready for ICD-10 switch
MDedge Psychiatry
CMS releases specialty-specific ICD-10 transition guides
MDedge Psychiatry
Caps on malpractice damages
MDedge Psychiatry
Last-minute ICD-10 help for docs who are lagging
MDedge Psychiatry
Ellmers’ bill seeks delay for Stage 3 meaningful use
MDedge Psychiatry
More lawsuits against doctors? Overpayment ruling could be bad news
MDedge Psychiatry
End-user agreements
MDedge Psychiatry