News

FRONTIER screen distinguishes frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s


 

FROM JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, NEUROSURGERY & PSYCHIATRY

References

Researchers who administered the FRONTIER Executive Screen (FES) – a brief bedside questionnaire designed to assess verbal fluency, inhibitory control, and working memory – were able to distinguish patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from patients with Alzheimer’s disease, according to a study published in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

“FES correctly classified over 90% of study participants into healthy controls or patients with dementia (bvFTD and AD). Within patient groups, almost three-quarters of patients with dementia were correctly classified into bvFTD and AD based on the total FES score,” wrote the researchers, led by Olivier Piguet, Ph.D., of Neuroscience Research Australia, New South Wales.

©roberthyrons/thinkstockphotos.com

They administered the FES to 28 patients with dementia (14 with bvFTD, 14 with Alzheimer’s disease) matched for disease severity and 33 age-matched healthy controls. After adjustment, they found that a cut-off FES total score of 7 or below achieved 71% sensitivity and 73% specificity for a diagnosis of bvFTD. While the researchers noted that the screen demonstrated excellent discriminative validity from distinguishing the two groups of patients, they warned that the test is not designed to replace a comprehensive cognitive assessment, and assessing executive dysfunction in other clinical populations using the FES is not recommended.

“Our findings indicate that the combination of the FES with the [Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination–III] will improve discriminative ability between dementia syndromes; however, this result will need to be demonstrated in prospective studies. Future research will also benefit from exploring the utility of administering the FES, in conjunction with social cognition measures, with evidence that such measures can also assist with differentiating bvFTD from AD, and bvFTD from psychiatric conditions,” the researchers wrote.

They indicated that they had no conflicts of interest.

Read the full article here.

mbock@frontlinemedcom.com

Recommended Reading

Unvetted drug indications mean safety uncertainties
MDedge Psychiatry
AAIC: Proving drugs modify Alzheimer’s disease faces skepticism
MDedge Psychiatry
EEG detects early conversion to Alzheimer’s disease
MDedge Psychiatry
Alzheimer’s patients often had low cerebral amyloid
MDedge Psychiatry
Physical activity, omega-3 supplements didn’t improve cognitive outcomes
MDedge Psychiatry
ESC: Atrial fibrillation accelerates brain atrophy
MDedge Psychiatry
EASD: High HbA1c linked to elevated dementia risk in patients with 2DM
MDedge Psychiatry
Prion-like transmission of neurodegenerative pathology stirs concern
MDedge Psychiatry
Dementia risk is 2-fold in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients
MDedge Psychiatry
Intravenous immunoglobulin briefly staved off progression to Alzheimer’s
MDedge Psychiatry